Significance of VP/VS ratio in locating earthquakes of a long-duration swarm in the western coast of India

IF 1.6 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Journal of Seismology Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1007/s10950-024-10223-6
Himangshu Paul, T. C. Sunilkumar, Vineet K. Gahalaut, D. Srinagesh, M. Shekar
{"title":"Significance of VP/VS ratio in locating earthquakes of a long-duration swarm in the western coast of India","authors":"Himangshu Paul,&nbsp;T. C. Sunilkumar,&nbsp;Vineet K. Gahalaut,&nbsp;D. Srinagesh,&nbsp;M. Shekar","doi":"10.1007/s10950-024-10223-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The earthquake swarm in Palghar, western India, is a natural laboratory to understand long-duration seismogenesis. However, it requires an accurate estimation of the key parameters, such as earthquake locations and the velocity model of the region. Two separate studies performed by two organisations in India, the CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute (NGRI) and the National Center for Seismology (NCS) reported significantly differing results from the first 8–12 months of earthquake monitoring in Palghar. CSIR-NGRI reported the depth of earthquakes in the range of 4–15 km, whereas NCS reported a much shallower depth down to 7 km only. We investigate the reason for this depth discrepancy by analysing datasets from the networks of both these organisations. We find that no available velocity models are able to reconcile the depth difference between the two datasets. Selection criteria generally adopted to determine a good velocity model, such as travel-time residuals and location errors, also failed to identify a suitable velocity model. Several synthetic tests helped us to identify that the network geometry and source-station separation are contributing factors to the observed depth difference. However, the main reason for the discrepancy was found to be inconsistent velocity models used for location at both networks. The main objective of our work is to estimate a velocity model which minimises the depth discrepancy between both datasets. In this regard, we synthetically generated hundreds of models with different V<sub>P</sub> and V<sub>P</sub>/V<sub>S</sub> ratios, followed by a grid search of V<sub>P</sub> and V<sub>P</sub>/V<sub>S</sub> ratios, which harmonises the location from the two datasets. The best model consists of a V<sub>P</sub> lying between 5.55–5.85 km/s and a V<sub>P</sub>/V<sub>S</sub> ratio between 1.77–1.81. For this velocity model, there is a greater overlap of the hypocentral clouds from both networks, and about 80% of the earthquakes of the CSIR-NGRI network were located within depths ≤ 7 km. We find that location errors vary seasonally, which is also related to the V<sub>P</sub>/V<sub>S</sub> of the crust. Since earlier studies have also found a strong correspondence between rainfall and seismicity in this region, we infer that the high V<sub>P</sub>/V<sub>S</sub> ratio might have been caused by the rainfall saturation of cracks in the Palghar seismicity zone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Seismology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Seismology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10950-024-10223-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The earthquake swarm in Palghar, western India, is a natural laboratory to understand long-duration seismogenesis. However, it requires an accurate estimation of the key parameters, such as earthquake locations and the velocity model of the region. Two separate studies performed by two organisations in India, the CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute (NGRI) and the National Center for Seismology (NCS) reported significantly differing results from the first 8–12 months of earthquake monitoring in Palghar. CSIR-NGRI reported the depth of earthquakes in the range of 4–15 km, whereas NCS reported a much shallower depth down to 7 km only. We investigate the reason for this depth discrepancy by analysing datasets from the networks of both these organisations. We find that no available velocity models are able to reconcile the depth difference between the two datasets. Selection criteria generally adopted to determine a good velocity model, such as travel-time residuals and location errors, also failed to identify a suitable velocity model. Several synthetic tests helped us to identify that the network geometry and source-station separation are contributing factors to the observed depth difference. However, the main reason for the discrepancy was found to be inconsistent velocity models used for location at both networks. The main objective of our work is to estimate a velocity model which minimises the depth discrepancy between both datasets. In this regard, we synthetically generated hundreds of models with different VP and VP/VS ratios, followed by a grid search of VP and VP/VS ratios, which harmonises the location from the two datasets. The best model consists of a VP lying between 5.55–5.85 km/s and a VP/VS ratio between 1.77–1.81. For this velocity model, there is a greater overlap of the hypocentral clouds from both networks, and about 80% of the earthquakes of the CSIR-NGRI network were located within depths ≤ 7 km. We find that location errors vary seasonally, which is also related to the VP/VS of the crust. Since earlier studies have also found a strong correspondence between rainfall and seismicity in this region, we infer that the high VP/VS ratio might have been caused by the rainfall saturation of cracks in the Palghar seismicity zone.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
VP/VS 比率在印度西海岸长持续时间地震群定位中的意义
印度西部帕尔加尔的地震群是了解长时间地震发生的天然实验室。然而,这需要对地震位置和该地区的速度模型等关键参数进行精确估算。印度的两家机构--CSIR-国家地球物理研究所(NGRI)和国家地震学中心(NCS)--分别进行了两项研究,报告了帕尔加尔最初 8-12 个月的地震监测结果,但结果大相径庭。CSIR-NGRI 报告的地震深度在 4-15 千米之间,而 NCS 报告的地震深度要浅得多,只有 7 千米。我们通过分析这两个组织网络的数据集,研究了造成这种深度差异的原因。我们发现,现有的速度模型都无法调和两个数据集之间的深度差异。一般用于确定良好速度模型的选择标准,如行进时间残差和位置误差,也未能确定合适的速度模型。几项合成测试帮助我们确定了网络几何形状和源站分离是造成观测到的深度差异的因素。然而,我们发现造成差异的主要原因是两个网络用于定位的速度模型不一致。我们工作的主要目标是估算一个速度模型,使两个数据集之间的深度差异最小。为此,我们合成了数百个具有不同 VP 和 VP/VS 比率的模型,然后对 VP 和 VP/VS 比率进行网格搜索,从而协调了两个数据集的定位。最佳模型是 VP 介于 5.55-5.85 km/s 之间,VP/VS 比值介于 1.77-1.81 之间。对于这个速度模型,两个网络的低中心云有更大的重叠,CSIR-NGRI 网络约 80% 的地震都位于深度 ≤ 7 km 的范围内。我们发现定位误差随季节变化,这也与地壳的 VP/VS 有关。由于早先的研究也发现该地区的降雨量与地震发生率之间存在很强的对应关系,我们推断 VP/VS 比率高可能是由于帕尔加尔地震带裂缝的降雨饱和造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Seismology
Journal of Seismology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Seismology is an international journal specialising in all observational and theoretical aspects related to earthquake occurrence. Research topics may cover: seismotectonics, seismicity, historical seismicity, seismic source physics, strong ground motion studies, seismic hazard or risk, engineering seismology, physics of fault systems, triggered and induced seismicity, mining seismology, volcano seismology, earthquake prediction, structural investigations ranging from local to regional and global studies with a particular focus on passive experiments.
期刊最新文献
Source parameters of the May 28, 2016, Mihoub earthquake (Mw 5.4, Algeria) deduced from Bayesian modelling of Sentinel-1 SAR data Fault imaging using earthquake sequences: a revised seismotectonic model for the Albstadt Shear Zone, Southwest Germany A logic-tree based probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the central ionian islands of cephalonia and ithaca (Western Greece) Developing machine learning-based ground motion models to predict peak ground velocity in Turkiye Fault structures of the Haichenghe fault zone in Liaoning, China from high-precision location based on dense array observation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1