Privacy-Preserving and Diversity-Aware Trust-based Team Formation in Online Social Networks

IF 7.2 4区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1145/3670411
Yash Mahajan, Jin-Hee Cho, Ing-Ray Chen
{"title":"Privacy-Preserving and Diversity-Aware Trust-based Team Formation in Online Social Networks","authors":"Yash Mahajan, Jin-Hee Cho, Ing-Ray Chen","doi":"10.1145/3670411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As online social networks (OSNs) become more prevalent, a new paradigm for problem-solving through crowd-sourcing has emerged. By leveraging the OSN platforms, users can post a problem to be solved and then form a team to collaborate and solve the problem. A common concern in OSNs is how to form effective collaborative teams, as various tasks are completed through online collaborative networks. A team’s diversity in expertise has received high attention to producing high team performance in developing team formation (TF) algorithms. However, the effect of team diversity on performance under different types of tasks has not been extensively studied. Another important issue is how to balance the need to preserve individuals’ privacy with the need to maximize performance through active collaboration, as these two goals may conflict with each other. This research has not been actively studied in the literature. In this work, we develop a team formation (TF) algorithm in the context of OSNs that can maximize team performance and preserve team members’ privacy under different types of tasks. Our proposed <underline>PR</underline>iv<underline>A</underline>cy-<underline>D</underline>iversity-<underline>A</underline>ware <underline>T</underline>eam <underline>F</underline>ormation framework, called <monospace>PRADA-TF</monospace>, is based on trust relationships between users in OSNs where trust is measured based on a user’s expertise and privacy preference levels. The PRADA-TF algorithm considers the team members’ domain expertise, privacy preferences, and the team’s expertise diversity in the process of team formation. Our approach employs game-theoretic principles <i>Mechanism Design</i> to motivate self-interested individuals within a team formation context, positioning the mechanism designer as the pivotal team leader responsible for assembling the team. We use two real-world datasets (i.e., Netscience and IMDb) to generate different semi-synthetic datasets for constructing trust networks using a belief model (i.e., Subjective Logic) and identifying trustworthy users as candidate team members. We evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed <monospace>PRADA-TF</monospace> scheme in four variants against three baseline methods in the literature. Our analysis focuses on three performance metrics for studying OSNs: social welfare, privacy loss, and team diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48967,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3670411","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As online social networks (OSNs) become more prevalent, a new paradigm for problem-solving through crowd-sourcing has emerged. By leveraging the OSN platforms, users can post a problem to be solved and then form a team to collaborate and solve the problem. A common concern in OSNs is how to form effective collaborative teams, as various tasks are completed through online collaborative networks. A team’s diversity in expertise has received high attention to producing high team performance in developing team formation (TF) algorithms. However, the effect of team diversity on performance under different types of tasks has not been extensively studied. Another important issue is how to balance the need to preserve individuals’ privacy with the need to maximize performance through active collaboration, as these two goals may conflict with each other. This research has not been actively studied in the literature. In this work, we develop a team formation (TF) algorithm in the context of OSNs that can maximize team performance and preserve team members’ privacy under different types of tasks. Our proposed PRivAcy-Diversity-Aware Team Formation framework, called PRADA-TF, is based on trust relationships between users in OSNs where trust is measured based on a user’s expertise and privacy preference levels. The PRADA-TF algorithm considers the team members’ domain expertise, privacy preferences, and the team’s expertise diversity in the process of team formation. Our approach employs game-theoretic principles Mechanism Design to motivate self-interested individuals within a team formation context, positioning the mechanism designer as the pivotal team leader responsible for assembling the team. We use two real-world datasets (i.e., Netscience and IMDb) to generate different semi-synthetic datasets for constructing trust networks using a belief model (i.e., Subjective Logic) and identifying trustworthy users as candidate team members. We evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed PRADA-TF scheme in four variants against three baseline methods in the literature. Our analysis focuses on three performance metrics for studying OSNs: social welfare, privacy loss, and team diversity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线社交网络中基于信任的隐私保护和多样性意识团队组建
随着在线社交网络(OSN)的日益普及,出现了一种通过众包解决问题的新模式。通过利用 OSN 平台,用户可以发布需要解决的问题,然后组成团队协作解决问题。由于各种任务都是通过在线协作网络完成的,因此如何组建有效的协作团队是 OSN 的一个共同关注点。在开发团队组建(TF)算法的过程中,团队专业知识的多样性对提高团队绩效的作用受到了高度关注。然而,团队多样性对不同类型任务下绩效的影响尚未得到广泛研究。另一个重要问题是,如何在保护个人隐私与通过积极协作最大化绩效之间取得平衡,因为这两个目标可能会相互冲突。这方面的研究在文献中还没有得到积极的探讨。在这项工作中,我们在 OSN 的背景下开发了一种团队组建(TF)算法,它可以在不同类型的任务下最大限度地提高团队绩效并保护团队成员的隐私。我们提出的 PRivAcy-Diversity-Aware 团队组建框架被称为 PRADA-TF,它基于 OSNs 中用户之间的信任关系,其中信任度是根据用户的专业知识和隐私偏好水平来衡量的。PRADA-TF 算法在组建团队的过程中考虑了团队成员的领域专长、隐私偏好和团队的专长多样性。我们的方法采用了博弈论原理--机制设计(Mechanism Design)来激励团队组建背景下的自利个体,并将机制设计者定位为负责组建团队的关键团队领导者。我们使用两个真实世界的数据集(即 Netscience 和 IMDb)来生成不同的半合成数据集,以便使用信念模型(即主观逻辑)构建信任网络,并将值得信赖的用户识别为候选团队成员。对照文献中的三种基准方法,我们评估了我们提出的 PRADA-TF 方案的四种变体的有效性。我们的分析侧重于研究 OSN 的三个性能指标:社会福利、隐私损失和团队多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology is a scholarly journal that publishes the highest quality papers on intelligent systems, applicable algorithms and technology with a multi-disciplinary perspective. An intelligent system is one that uses artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to offer important services (e.g., as a component of a larger system) to allow integrated systems to perceive, reason, learn, and act intelligently in the real world. ACM TIST is published quarterly (six issues a year). Each issue has 8-11 regular papers, with around 20 published journal pages or 10,000 words per paper. Additional references, proofs, graphs or detailed experiment results can be submitted as a separate appendix, while excessively lengthy papers will be rejected automatically. Authors can include online-only appendices for additional content of their published papers and are encouraged to share their code and/or data with other readers.
期刊最新文献
Aspect-enhanced Explainable Recommendation with Multi-modal Contrastive Learning The Social Cognition Ability Evaluation of LLMs: A Dynamic Gamified Assessment and Hierarchical Social Learning Measurement Approach Explaining Neural News Recommendation with Attributions onto Reading Histories Misinformation Resilient Search Rankings with Webgraph-based Interventions Privacy-Preserving and Diversity-Aware Trust-based Team Formation in Online Social Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1