Evaluation of the Urban Climate Model PALM-4U over Hilly Terrain Using Wind and Turbulence Observations

IF 1.2 4区 地球科学 Q4 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Meteorologische Zeitschrift Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1127/metz/2024/1193
Olga Kiseleva, Leonhard Gantner, Norbert Kalthoff, Meinolf Kossmann, Christopher Holst
{"title":"Evaluation of the Urban Climate Model PALM-4U over Hilly Terrain Using Wind and Turbulence Observations","authors":"Olga Kiseleva, Leonhard Gantner, Norbert Kalthoff, Meinolf Kossmann, Christopher Holst","doi":"10.1127/metz/2024/1193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We used boundary layer observations in the Stuttgart area from two summer episodes for model evaluation of the urban climate model PALM-4U. In summer 2017, radiosondes and Doppler lidars were operated, and the lidar virtual tower technique was applied to provide vertical profiles of wind speed and direction at different sites. In summer 2018, two Doppler lidars were operated in vertical stare mode providing vertical wind speeds and their variances. PALM-4U with grid spacings of 10 m in 2018 and 40 m in 2017 was driven by COSMO analysis data. The PALM-4U output data were evaluated with the observations at the corresponding sites. For 14 to 15 August 2017, the normalised root mean square error (NRMSE) between simulated and measured wind speed time series at 100 m agl is about 0.5, except for the last hours of the investigated period. The RMSE for wind direction is 30–35°. At 700 m agl, the NRMSE for wind speed is 0.2–0.3 and the RMSE for wind direction is about 15°. The greater NRMSE differences found in the night and morning of 15 August can be explained by differences between the observed and simulated height of the low-level jet which caused stronger simulated turbulent downward mixing of momentum in the morning. On 20 June 2018, the daytime convective boundary-layer evolution was well represented in the model. However, as the wind speed was low, 1-h integration times turned out to be not suitable for model evaluation because the uncertainty in variances of the vertical wind is considerable (50%). To overcome the poor statistics due to the low number of eddies dominating, 3-h integration times turned out to be necessary. For these time intervals, the simulated profiles lie within the error bars of the observations. Theoretical considerations provide suggestions for experimental set-ups and synoptic conditions to capture vertical profiles allowing model evaluations under convective conditions based on 1-h intervals.","PeriodicalId":49824,"journal":{"name":"Meteorologische Zeitschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meteorologische Zeitschrift","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2024/1193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We used boundary layer observations in the Stuttgart area from two summer episodes for model evaluation of the urban climate model PALM-4U. In summer 2017, radiosondes and Doppler lidars were operated, and the lidar virtual tower technique was applied to provide vertical profiles of wind speed and direction at different sites. In summer 2018, two Doppler lidars were operated in vertical stare mode providing vertical wind speeds and their variances. PALM-4U with grid spacings of 10 m in 2018 and 40 m in 2017 was driven by COSMO analysis data. The PALM-4U output data were evaluated with the observations at the corresponding sites. For 14 to 15 August 2017, the normalised root mean square error (NRMSE) between simulated and measured wind speed time series at 100 m agl is about 0.5, except for the last hours of the investigated period. The RMSE for wind direction is 30–35°. At 700 m agl, the NRMSE for wind speed is 0.2–0.3 and the RMSE for wind direction is about 15°. The greater NRMSE differences found in the night and morning of 15 August can be explained by differences between the observed and simulated height of the low-level jet which caused stronger simulated turbulent downward mixing of momentum in the morning. On 20 June 2018, the daytime convective boundary-layer evolution was well represented in the model. However, as the wind speed was low, 1-h integration times turned out to be not suitable for model evaluation because the uncertainty in variances of the vertical wind is considerable (50%). To overcome the poor statistics due to the low number of eddies dominating, 3-h integration times turned out to be necessary. For these time intervals, the simulated profiles lie within the error bars of the observations. Theoretical considerations provide suggestions for experimental set-ups and synoptic conditions to capture vertical profiles allowing model evaluations under convective conditions based on 1-h intervals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用风和湍流观测数据评估丘陵地形上的城市气候模式 PALM-4U
我们利用斯图加特地区两个夏季的边界层观测数据对城市气候模式PALM-4U进行了模式评估。2017 年夏季,运行了无线电探空仪和多普勒激光雷达,并应用激光雷达虚拟塔技术提供了不同地点的风速和风向垂直剖面图。2018 年夏季,两个多普勒激光雷达以垂直凝视模式运行,提供垂直风速及其变差。PALM-4U 的网格间距在 2018 年为 10 米,2017 年为 40 米,由 COSMO 分析数据驱动。PALM-4U 输出数据与相应站点的观测数据进行了评估。在 2017 年 8 月 14 日至 15 日期间,除调查时段的最后几个小时外,100 米高度处模拟风速时间序列与实测风速时间序列之间的归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)约为 0.5。风向的均方根误差为 30-35°。在海拔 700 米处,风速的无均方根误差为 0.2-0.3,风向的均方根误差约为 15°。8 月 15 日夜间和早晨的 NRMSE 差异较大,原因可能是观测和模拟的低空喷流高度不同,导致早晨模拟的动量向下湍流混合更强。2018 年 6 月 20 日,白天的对流边界层演变在模式中得到了很好的体现。然而,由于风速较低,1-h积分时间并不适合模型评估,因为垂直风的不确定性相当大(50%)。为了克服由于漩涡数量较少而导致的统计数据不准确的问题,需要 3 小时的积分时间。在这些时间间隔内,模拟剖面位于观测数据的误差范围内。理论上的考虑为实验设置和同步条件提供了建议,以便捕捉垂直剖面,在对流条件下根据 1 小时的时间间隔对模型进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Meteorologische Zeitschrift
Meteorologische Zeitschrift 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Meteorologische Zeitschrift (Contributions to Atmospheric Sciences) accepts high-quality, English language, double peer-reviewed manuscripts on all aspects of observational, theoretical and computational research on the entire field of meteorology and atmospheric physics, including climatology. Manuscripts from applied sectors such as, e.g., Environmental Meteorology or Energy Meteorology are particularly welcome. Meteorologische Zeitschrift (Contributions to Atmospheric Sciences) represents a natural forum for the meteorological community of Central Europe and worldwide.
期刊最新文献
High-resolution ensemble LES energy balance closure study of the LITFASS-2003 campaign Exploring the ability of regional extrapolation for precipitation nowcasting with deep learning Characteristics of rain cells over the northwest Pacific warm pool Observations and forecasting of a low visibility event in Hong Kong on New Year’s Eve Effect of volcanic sulfur dioxide on solar UV irradiance during the 2023 Fagradalsfjall eruption in Reykjavík, Iceland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1