Characterizing applications, exposure risks, and hazard communication for engineered nanomaterials in construction.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of industrial medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1002/ajim.23618
Bruce E Lippy, Sara B Brooks, Michael R Cooper, Leonard G Burrelli, Andreas Saldivar, Gavin H West
{"title":"Characterizing applications, exposure risks, and hazard communication for engineered nanomaterials in construction.","authors":"Bruce E Lippy, Sara B Brooks, Michael R Cooper, Leonard G Burrelli, Andreas Saldivar, Gavin H West","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) may pose health risks to workers. Objectives were to characterize ENM applications in construction, identify exposure scenarios, and evaluate the quality of safety data sheets (SDSs) for nano-enabled construction products.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SDSs and product data were obtained from a public database of nano-enabled construction products. Descriptive statistics were calculated for affected trades, product categories, and types of ENMs. A sample of SDSs (n = 33) was evaluated using modified criteria developed by NIOSH researchers. Bulk analysis via transmission electron microscopy characterized nanoparticles in a subset of products.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Companies report using >50 ENMs in construction products. ENM composition could not be determined via SDSs for 38.1% of the 907 products examined. Polymers and metal oxides tied for most frequently reported ENMs (n = 87, 9.6%). Nano silica, graphene, carbon nanotubes, and silver nanoparticles were also frequently reported. Most of the products were paints and coatings (n = 483, 53.3%), followed by pre-market additives, cementitious materials, insulation, and lubricants. Workers in twenty construction trades are likely to handle nano-enabled products, these particularly encompass cement and brick masons, painters, laborers, carpenters, glaziers, and insulators. A wide range of exposure scenarios were identified. SDSs were classified as satisfactory (18%), in need of improvement (12%), or in need of significant improvement (70%). Bulk analyses revealed discrepancies between actual ENM composition and those in SDSs.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>There has been significant progress investigating risks to construction workers posed by ENMs, but SDSs need major improvements. This study provides new insights on the use of ENMs in construction, exposure risks, and hazard communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) may pose health risks to workers. Objectives were to characterize ENM applications in construction, identify exposure scenarios, and evaluate the quality of safety data sheets (SDSs) for nano-enabled construction products.

Methods: SDSs and product data were obtained from a public database of nano-enabled construction products. Descriptive statistics were calculated for affected trades, product categories, and types of ENMs. A sample of SDSs (n = 33) was evaluated using modified criteria developed by NIOSH researchers. Bulk analysis via transmission electron microscopy characterized nanoparticles in a subset of products.

Results: Companies report using >50 ENMs in construction products. ENM composition could not be determined via SDSs for 38.1% of the 907 products examined. Polymers and metal oxides tied for most frequently reported ENMs (n = 87, 9.6%). Nano silica, graphene, carbon nanotubes, and silver nanoparticles were also frequently reported. Most of the products were paints and coatings (n = 483, 53.3%), followed by pre-market additives, cementitious materials, insulation, and lubricants. Workers in twenty construction trades are likely to handle nano-enabled products, these particularly encompass cement and brick masons, painters, laborers, carpenters, glaziers, and insulators. A wide range of exposure scenarios were identified. SDSs were classified as satisfactory (18%), in need of improvement (12%), or in need of significant improvement (70%). Bulk analyses revealed discrepancies between actual ENM composition and those in SDSs.

Discussion and conclusion: There has been significant progress investigating risks to construction workers posed by ENMs, but SDSs need major improvements. This study provides new insights on the use of ENMs in construction, exposure risks, and hazard communication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定工程纳米材料在建筑中的应用、暴露风险和危害通报。
背景:工程纳米材料(ENMs)可能对工人的健康构成风险。目的是描述ENM在建筑中的应用,确定暴露情景,并评估纳米建筑产品安全数据表(SDS)的质量:方法:从纳米建筑产品公共数据库中获取安全数据表和产品数据。计算了受影响行业、产品类别和 ENM 类型的描述性统计。使用 NIOSH 研究人员制定的修改标准对 SDS 样本(n = 33)进行了评估。通过透射电子显微镜对部分产品中的纳米颗粒进行了批量分析:结果:各公司报告在建筑产品中使用了 >50 种 ENM。在检测的 907 种产品中,有 38.1% 的 ENM 成分无法通过 SDS 确定。聚合物和金属氧化物并列最常报告的 ENMs(n = 87,9.6%)。纳米二氧化硅、石墨烯、碳纳米管和纳米银颗粒也经常被报告。大多数产品是油漆和涂料(n = 483,53.3%),其次是上市前添加剂、胶凝材料、绝缘材料和润滑剂。二十个建筑行业的工人可能会处理纳米产品,尤其是水泥和砖瓦砌筑工、油漆工、工人、木工、玻璃工和绝缘工。已确定的暴露情景范围很广。安全数据单被归类为令人满意(18%)、需要改进(12%)或需要大力改进(70%)。批量分析显示 ENM 的实际成分与安全数据单中的成分存在差异:在调查 ENM 对建筑工人造成的风险方面取得了重大进展,但安全数据单仍需大力改进。本研究为 ENMs 在建筑中的使用、暴露风险和危害交流提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of industrial medicine
American journal of industrial medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.
期刊最新文献
A longitudinal pre-post study: An evaluation of the Department of the Air Force bundled occupational fall prevention efforts. Issue Information Essential(ly forgotten) workers: Latine youth farmworkers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Surveillance of asbestos related disease among workers enrolled in an exposure registry. Prevalence of COVID-19 and Long COVID by industry and occupation: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1