Effective Behaviors of Leaders During Clinical Emergencies: A Qualitative Study of Followers' Perspectives.

Abstract

Background: To manage a clinical emergency effectively, physicians need well-developed leadership skills, yet limited structured leadership training is available for critical care trainees. To develop an effective curriculum, leadership competencies must first be defined.

Research question: During clinical emergencies, what leadership behaviors do followers value?

Study design and methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with members of multidisciplinary critical care teams at a large academic health system, with participants including resident physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists (N = 15). Thematic analysis was used to categorize leadership behaviors that followers perceived to be effective.

Results: We identified three themes related to leadership during clinical emergencies: control, collaboration, and common understanding. Participants described behaviors they believed resulted in both effective and ineffective leadership. For effective leaders, control, the most dominant theme, included behaviors that clearly established roles for the leader and followers, allowing the leader to guide care during a clinical emergency. Collaboration referenced the ability of a leader to maintain a collegial environment. Finally, common understanding reflected a leader's ability to manage communication in a way that fostered a shared mental model across team members.

Interpretation: During clinical emergencies, followers value leaders who assert themselves while also maintaining positive team interaction and encouraging an organized flow of information. Our findings provide a potential framework to develop a leadership curriculum for critical care trainees.