Efficacy and Safety of Programmed Death 1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Plus Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated Antigen 4 Inhibitors for Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1097/FTD.0000000000001228
Wei Ren, Yingying Fang, Yujing He, Yifeng Ren, Minfang Wang, Anyi Xu, Jiale Ruan, Qinghua Tao
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Programmed Death 1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Plus Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated Antigen 4 Inhibitors for Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Wei Ren, Yingying Fang, Yujing He, Yifeng Ren, Minfang Wang, Anyi Xu, Jiale Ruan, Qinghua Tao","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Authors conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and Medline for randomized controlled trials comparing the prognosis and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors with other therapies for advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effect sizes. The primary outcomes of this study were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4943 patients diagnosed with stage III/IV advanced or metastatic NSCLC were included in the analysis of the 6 randomized controlled trials. The results showed that patients receiving dual immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors had a longer survival time compared with the control group (HR = 0.88, P = 0.044). However, no statistically significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (HR = 0.95, P = 0.579). Subgroup analysis revealed better OS in the interventional group for patients aged >65 years (HR = 0.88, P = 0.076), smokers (HR = 0.81, P = 0.036), and those with a tumor mutational burden (TMB) ≥20 mut/Mb (HR = 0.66, P < 0.001). Conversely, the control group demonstrated superior OS in patients with TMB <20 mut/Mb (HR = 1.14, P = 0.048). In addition, the statistical results indicated a lower incidence rate of any-grade anemia in the dual immunotherapy group compared with the control group (RR = 0.32, P = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of dual immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors for treating advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Its efficacy is influenced by certain clinical and pathological factors, such as age, smoking status, and TMB.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":"422-433"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001228","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: Authors conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and Medline for randomized controlled trials comparing the prognosis and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors with other therapies for advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effect sizes. The primary outcomes of this study were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival.

Results: A total of 4943 patients diagnosed with stage III/IV advanced or metastatic NSCLC were included in the analysis of the 6 randomized controlled trials. The results showed that patients receiving dual immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors had a longer survival time compared with the control group (HR = 0.88, P = 0.044). However, no statistically significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (HR = 0.95, P = 0.579). Subgroup analysis revealed better OS in the interventional group for patients aged >65 years (HR = 0.88, P = 0.076), smokers (HR = 0.81, P = 0.036), and those with a tumor mutational burden (TMB) ≥20 mut/Mb (HR = 0.66, P < 0.001). Conversely, the control group demonstrated superior OS in patients with TMB <20 mut/Mb (HR = 1.14, P = 0.048). In addition, the statistical results indicated a lower incidence rate of any-grade anemia in the dual immunotherapy group compared with the control group (RR = 0.32, P = 0.04).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of dual immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibitors for treating advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Its efficacy is influenced by certain clinical and pathological factors, such as age, smoking status, and TMB.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
程序性死亡 1/程序性死亡配体 1 加细胞毒性 T 淋巴细胞相关抗原 4 抑制剂治疗晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌的有效性和安全性:基于随机对照试验的 Meta 分析。
背景:本荟萃分析旨在研究程序性死亡1(PD-1)/程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)联合细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关抗原4(CTLA-4)抑制剂治疗晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的有效性和安全性:作者对PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Scopus和Medline进行了全面检索,以寻找比较PD-1/PD-L1加CTLA-4抑制剂与其他疗法治疗晚期或转移性NSCLC的预后和安全性的随机对照试验。采用危险比 (HR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI) 作为效应大小。本研究的主要结果是总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期:共有4943名确诊为III/IV期晚期或转移性NSCLC患者参与了6项随机对照试验的分析。结果显示,与对照组相比,接受PD-1/PD-L1加CTLA-4抑制剂双重免疫疗法的患者生存时间更长(HR=0.88,P=0.044)。然而,在无进展生存期方面没有观察到明显的统计学差异(HR = 0.95,P = 0.579)。亚组分析显示,年龄大于65岁(HR = 0.88,P = 0.076)、吸烟(HR = 0.81,P = 0.036)和肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)≥20 mut/Mb(HR = 0.66,P < 0.001)的患者,介入组的OS更好。相反,对照组在TMB患者中显示出更优越的OS:这项荟萃分析证明了PD-1/PD-L1加CTLA-4抑制剂双重免疫疗法治疗晚期或转移性NSCLC的有效性和安全性。其疗效受某些临床和病理因素的影响,如年龄、吸烟状况和TMB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
213
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of pharmacologists, clinical chemists, laboratorians, pharmacists, drug researchers and toxicologists. It fosters the exchange of knowledge among the various disciplines–clinical pharmacology, pathology, toxicology, analytical chemistry–that share a common interest in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. The journal presents studies detailing the various factors that affect the rate and extent drugs are absorbed, metabolized, and excreted. Regular features include review articles on specific classes of drugs, original articles, case reports, technical notes, and continuing education articles.
期刊最新文献
Midazolam Boosting With Cobicistat in a Patient With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy and Focal Status Epilepticus. New Developments and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Options in Costimulatory Blockade in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Critical Review. Implementation of Volumetric Finger-Prick Self-Sampling for TDM of Immunosuppressants After Kidney Transplantation: Lessons Learned from the Practice. Examining Whole Blood, Total and Free Plasma Tacrolimus in Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients. Precision Dosing of Intravenous Tocilizumab: Development of Pharmacokinetic Model-Derived Tapering Strategies for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1