Comparing patients treated with CBT for insomnia with healthy sleepers and sleepers with past insomnia on dimensions of sleep health

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep Health Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sleh.2024.03.005
{"title":"Comparing patients treated with CBT for insomnia with healthy sleepers and sleepers with past insomnia on dimensions of sleep health","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.sleh.2024.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare patients treated with cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) with healthy sleepers and individuals with past but not current insomnia on multidimensional sleep health.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study evaluates CBT-I on six dimensions of sleep health (regularity, satisfaction, alertness, timing, efficiency, duration) in a sample of individuals with insomnia compared to two other unique sleep samples. Participants were in one of three groups: insomnia (CUR, n = 299), healthy sleeper (HS, n = 122), or past insomnia (PAST, n = 35). Daily diaries and validated measures were employed to capture six dimensions of sleep health. The CUR group received four 60-minute sessions of CBT-I every 2<!--> <!-->weeks, and sleep health indices were measured at baseline and post-treatment. The HS and PAST groups were measured only at baseline.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Results of the pairwise <em>t</em> tests indicated improvements in sleep satisfaction, alertness (fatigue but not sleepiness), timing, efficiency, and duration (Cohen’s <em>d</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.22 to 1.55). ANCOVA models revealed significant differences in sleep health scores between treated insomnia patients and the other two sleep groups. Treated patients demonstrated less bedtime and risetime variability, in addition to lower napping duration. Overall, the study observed significant changes in various domains of sleep health after four sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia; however, differences remain when compared to the other groups in the study.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There may be ongoing sleep vulnerability in patients treated with cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia though future inclusion of a control group would increase internal validity. Borrowing from transdiagnostic sleep modules may be helpful to support remaining deficits after cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48545,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Health","volume":"10 4","pages":"Pages 515-522"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352721824000615/pdfft?md5=b6746eedc9348b22e1df20c95de96f8a&pid=1-s2.0-S2352721824000615-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352721824000615","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To compare patients treated with cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) with healthy sleepers and individuals with past but not current insomnia on multidimensional sleep health.

Methods

The study evaluates CBT-I on six dimensions of sleep health (regularity, satisfaction, alertness, timing, efficiency, duration) in a sample of individuals with insomnia compared to two other unique sleep samples. Participants were in one of three groups: insomnia (CUR, n = 299), healthy sleeper (HS, n = 122), or past insomnia (PAST, n = 35). Daily diaries and validated measures were employed to capture six dimensions of sleep health. The CUR group received four 60-minute sessions of CBT-I every 2 weeks, and sleep health indices were measured at baseline and post-treatment. The HS and PAST groups were measured only at baseline.

Results

Results of the pairwise t tests indicated improvements in sleep satisfaction, alertness (fatigue but not sleepiness), timing, efficiency, and duration (Cohen’s d = 0.22 to 1.55). ANCOVA models revealed significant differences in sleep health scores between treated insomnia patients and the other two sleep groups. Treated patients demonstrated less bedtime and risetime variability, in addition to lower napping duration. Overall, the study observed significant changes in various domains of sleep health after four sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia; however, differences remain when compared to the other groups in the study.

Conclusion

There may be ongoing sleep vulnerability in patients treated with cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia though future inclusion of a control group would increase internal validity. Borrowing from transdiagnostic sleep modules may be helpful to support remaining deficits after cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较接受 CBT 治疗的失眠患者与健康睡眠者和既往失眠者在睡眠健康方面的表现。
目的:比较接受失眠认知行为疗法(CBT-I)治疗的患者与健康睡眠者以及过去有但现在没有失眠症的人的多维睡眠健康状况:比较接受失眠认知行为疗法(CBT-I)治疗的患者与健康睡眠者以及曾经失眠但目前未失眠的患者在多维睡眠健康方面的表现:该研究评估了 CBT-I 在失眠症患者样本中与其他两个独特的睡眠样本相比,在睡眠健康的六个维度(规律性、满意度、警觉性、时间性、效率、持续时间)上的效果。参与者分为三组:失眠组(CUR,n = 299)、健康睡眠组(HS,n = 122)或既往失眠组(PAST,n = 35)。采用每日日记和有效的测量方法来记录睡眠健康的六个方面。CUR组每两周接受四次60分钟的CBT-I治疗,并在基线和治疗后测量睡眠健康指数。HS组和PAST组仅在基线时进行测量:成对 t 检验结果表明,患者的睡眠满意度、警觉性(疲劳但不困倦)、时间、效率和持续时间均有所改善(Cohen's d=0.22-1.55)。方差分析模型显示,接受治疗的失眠症患者与其他两个睡眠组的睡眠健康评分存在明显差异。接受治疗的患者就寝时间和起床时间的可变性较小,午睡持续时间也较短。总体而言,经过四个疗程的失眠认知行为疗法治疗后,该研究观察到睡眠健康的各个领域都发生了显著变化;然而,与研究中的其他组别相比,差异依然存在:结论:接受认知行为疗法治疗的失眠症患者可能存在持续的睡眠脆弱性,但未来纳入对照组将提高内部有效性。借用跨诊断睡眠模块可能有助于支持认知行为疗法治疗失眠后的剩余缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Health
Sleep Health CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
114
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Sleep Health Journal of the National Sleep Foundation is a multidisciplinary journal that explores sleep''s role in population health and elucidates the social science perspective on sleep and health. Aligned with the National Sleep Foundation''s global authoritative, evidence-based voice for sleep health, the journal serves as the foremost publication for manuscripts that advance the sleep health of all members of society.The scope of the journal extends across diverse sleep-related fields, including anthropology, education, health services research, human development, international health, law, mental health, nursing, nutrition, psychology, public health, public policy, fatigue management, transportation, social work, and sociology. The journal welcomes original research articles, review articles, brief reports, special articles, letters to the editor, editorials, and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
A community-engaged qualitative study of factors affecting sleep among Hispanic/Latinos with short sleep duration. Perceived financial hardship and sleep in an adult population-based cohort: The mediating role of psychosocial and lifestyle-related factors. Depressive symptoms among middle-aged and older adults in China: The interaction of physical activity and sleep duration. ChatGPT vs. sleep disorder specialist responses to common sleep queries: Ratings by experts and laypeople: Comment. The effects of experimental sleep disruption on daytime performance among children with asthma living in urban environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1