Bayesian data-driven models for pharmaceutical process development

IF 8 2区 工程技术 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1016/j.coche.2024.101034
Hochan Chang, Nathan Domagalski, Jose E Tabora, Jean W Tom
{"title":"Bayesian data-driven models for pharmaceutical process development","authors":"Hochan Chang,&nbsp;Nathan Domagalski,&nbsp;Jose E Tabora,&nbsp;Jean W Tom","doi":"10.1016/j.coche.2024.101034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The primary objectives of pharmaceutical development encompass identifying the routes, processes, and conditions for producing medicines while establishing a control strategy to ensure acceptable quality attributes throughout the commercial manufacturing lifecycle. However, achieving these goals is challenged by uncertainties surrounding design decisions for the manufacturing process and variations in manufacturing methods resulting in distributions of outcomes during production. In this discussion, we focus on Bayesian approaches to quantify uncertainty and guide decision-making in process development.Bayesian modeling with Markov chain Monte Carlo proves effective in estimating process reliability. Recent advancements in surrogate models (e.g. Gaussian process, decision trees, and neural networks) offer novel means to quantify uncertainty and have shown success in designing experimental plans that reduce the number of required experiments to determine the optimal process design. By leveraging Bayesian approaches, chemical engineers can enhance their ability to navigate complex decision landscapes and optimize processes for improved efficiency and reliability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":292,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 101034"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211339824000352","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary objectives of pharmaceutical development encompass identifying the routes, processes, and conditions for producing medicines while establishing a control strategy to ensure acceptable quality attributes throughout the commercial manufacturing lifecycle. However, achieving these goals is challenged by uncertainties surrounding design decisions for the manufacturing process and variations in manufacturing methods resulting in distributions of outcomes during production. In this discussion, we focus on Bayesian approaches to quantify uncertainty and guide decision-making in process development.Bayesian modeling with Markov chain Monte Carlo proves effective in estimating process reliability. Recent advancements in surrogate models (e.g. Gaussian process, decision trees, and neural networks) offer novel means to quantify uncertainty and have shown success in designing experimental plans that reduce the number of required experiments to determine the optimal process design. By leveraging Bayesian approaches, chemical engineers can enhance their ability to navigate complex decision landscapes and optimize processes for improved efficiency and reliability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于制药工艺开发的贝叶斯数据驱动模型
药品开发的主要目标包括确定药品生产的路线、工艺和条件,同时制定控制策略,以确保在整个商业生产生命周期内达到可接受的质量属性。然而,由于生产工艺设计决策的不确定性以及生产方法的变化导致生产过程中的结果分布不均,实现这些目标面临挑战。在本讨论中,我们将重点讨论贝叶斯方法,以量化不确定性并指导工艺开发中的决策。事实证明,使用马尔科夫链蒙特卡罗进行贝叶斯建模可有效估计工艺可靠性。代用模型(如高斯过程、决策树和神经网络)的最新进展提供了量化不确定性的新方法,并在设计实验计划方面取得了成功,减少了确定最佳工艺设计所需的实验次数。利用贝叶斯方法,化学工程师可以提高驾驭复杂决策环境的能力,并优化工艺以提高效率和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering
Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGYENGINE-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering is devoted to bringing forth short and focused review articles written by experts on current advances in different areas of chemical engineering. Only invited review articles will be published. The goals of each review article in Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering are: 1. To acquaint the reader/researcher with the most important recent papers in the given topic. 2. To provide the reader with the views/opinions of the expert in each topic. The reviews are short (about 2500 words or 5-10 printed pages with figures) and serve as an invaluable source of information for researchers, teachers, professionals and students. The reviews also aim to stimulate exchange of ideas among experts. Themed sections: Each review will focus on particular aspects of one of the following themed sections of chemical engineering: 1. Nanotechnology 2. Energy and environmental engineering 3. Biotechnology and bioprocess engineering 4. Biological engineering (covering tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, drug delivery) 5. Separation engineering (covering membrane technologies, adsorbents, desalination, distillation etc.) 6. Materials engineering (covering biomaterials, inorganic especially ceramic materials, nanostructured materials). 7. Process systems engineering 8. Reaction engineering and catalysis.
期刊最新文献
New advance in application research of high-gravity process intensification technology Editorial Board Distillation in high gravity chemical engineering Gas–liquid and liquid–liquid vortex technology for process intensification Graphitic carbon nitride/bismuth-based Z-scheme heterojunctions for the photocatalytic removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products — a review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1