Single Apheresis Session on the 4th Day of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Administration Seems Convenient to Collect Enough Peripheral Blood Stem Cells from Healthy Donors

O. Yucel, Dilek Yapar, Ece Vural, Nurcan Alhan, Sertac Vurgun, Unal Atas, M. Alemdar, Mustafa Karaca, U. Iltar, O. Salim, L. Undar
{"title":"Single Apheresis Session on the 4th Day of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Administration Seems Convenient to Collect Enough Peripheral Blood Stem Cells from Healthy Donors","authors":"O. Yucel, Dilek Yapar, Ece Vural, Nurcan Alhan, Sertac Vurgun, Unal Atas, M. Alemdar, Mustafa Karaca, U. Iltar, O. Salim, L. Undar","doi":"10.1159/000538457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To minimize adverse events of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection in healthy donors, it is reasonable to limit the total dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and/or the number of apheresis days without decreasing of PBSCs yield. Therefore, we have started to collect G-CSF induced PBSCs on day 4 instead of on day 5. So, we retrospectively aimed to investigate the results of this 4-day G-CSF administration. Study Design and Methods: Seventy-six healthy donors who performed on G-CSF induced PBSCs donation consecutively between January 2020 and July 2022 were included in this study. G-CSF (filgrastim) at 2 × 5 µg/kg/day subcutaneously was applied. Apheresis started on day 4. Results: Sixty-nine (90.8%) of 76 donors provided enough PBSCs on day 4 apheresis session. Younger age (p = 0.004), higher PB CD34+ cell count on the 4th day of G-CSF (p < 0.001), and male donor (p = 0.010) were correlated with increased amounts of PBSCs yield. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to predict very good mobilizers (collected PBSCs ≥8 × 106/kg after the first apheresis) were performed. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, male sex (p = 0.004), PB CD34+ cell count ≥100/µL on the 4th day of G-CSF (p < 0.001), and glomerular filtration rate ≥115 mL/min (p = 0.031) were found to be independent predicting factors to demonstrate very good mobilizer. Conclusion: It seems that starting the apheresis on the 4th day of G-CSF administration is effective and to provide minimal G-CSF exposure in healthy donors.","PeriodicalId":505859,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy","volume":"9 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To minimize adverse events of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection in healthy donors, it is reasonable to limit the total dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and/or the number of apheresis days without decreasing of PBSCs yield. Therefore, we have started to collect G-CSF induced PBSCs on day 4 instead of on day 5. So, we retrospectively aimed to investigate the results of this 4-day G-CSF administration. Study Design and Methods: Seventy-six healthy donors who performed on G-CSF induced PBSCs donation consecutively between January 2020 and July 2022 were included in this study. G-CSF (filgrastim) at 2 × 5 µg/kg/day subcutaneously was applied. Apheresis started on day 4. Results: Sixty-nine (90.8%) of 76 donors provided enough PBSCs on day 4 apheresis session. Younger age (p = 0.004), higher PB CD34+ cell count on the 4th day of G-CSF (p < 0.001), and male donor (p = 0.010) were correlated with increased amounts of PBSCs yield. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to predict very good mobilizers (collected PBSCs ≥8 × 106/kg after the first apheresis) were performed. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, male sex (p = 0.004), PB CD34+ cell count ≥100/µL on the 4th day of G-CSF (p < 0.001), and glomerular filtration rate ≥115 mL/min (p = 0.031) were found to be independent predicting factors to demonstrate very good mobilizer. Conclusion: It seems that starting the apheresis on the 4th day of G-CSF administration is effective and to provide minimal G-CSF exposure in healthy donors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在施用粒细胞集落刺激因子的第四天进行一次无细胞抽吸,似乎就能从健康捐献者体内采集到足够的外周血干细胞
背景:为尽量减少健康供者采集外周血干细胞(PBSC)的不良反应,在不降低PBSCs产量的情况下,限制粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的总剂量和/或无细胞采集天数是合理的。因此,我们开始在第 4 天而不是第 5 天收集 G-CSF 诱导的 PBSCs。因此,我们回顾性地研究了4天G-CSF给药的结果。研究设计与方法:本研究纳入了在 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 7 月期间连续进行 G-CSF 诱导 PBSCs 捐献的 76 名健康捐献者。皮下注射 2 × 5 µg/kg/ 天的 G-CSF(filgrastim)。第 4 天开始进行血液透析。研究结果76名捐献者中有69名(90.8%)在第4天的血液净化过程中提供了足够的PBSCs。年龄越小(p = 0.004)、使用 G-CSF 第 4 天的 PB CD34+ 细胞计数越高(p < 0.001)和男性供体(p = 0.010)与 PBSCs 产量的增加相关。通过单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析预测了非常好的动员者(第一次血液净化后收集的 PBSCs ≥8 × 106/kg)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,男性性别(p = 0.004)、G-CSF 第 4 天的 PB CD34+ 细胞计数≥100/μL(p < 0.001)和肾小球滤过率≥115 mL/min(p = 0.031)被认为是证明动员效果非常好的独立预测因素。结论看来,在给予 G-CSF 的第 4 天开始无细胞疗法是有效的,并能使健康供体的 G-CSF 暴露最小化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advancing Transfusion Medicine through Raman Tweezers Spectroscopy: A Review of Recent Progress and Future Perspectives Single Apheresis Session on the 4th Day of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Administration Seems Convenient to Collect Enough Peripheral Blood Stem Cells from Healthy Donors Role of MiRNA in the Regulation of Blood Group Expression A Short History of B-Cell HLA Epitopes Successful Desensitization with Imlifidase and Daratumumab in a Highly Immunized, Crossmatch Positive, Blood Group-Incompatible Living-Donor Re-Transplant Recipient with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Antiphospholipid Syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1