Promoting Late-Life Volunteering with Timebanking: A Quasi-Experimental Mixed-Methods Study in Hong Kong

Shiyu Lu, C. Chui, Terry Lum, Tianyin Liu, G. Wong, Wai Chan
{"title":"Promoting Late-Life Volunteering with Timebanking: A Quasi-Experimental Mixed-Methods Study in Hong Kong","authors":"Shiyu Lu, C. Chui, Terry Lum, Tianyin Liu, G. Wong, Wai Chan","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igae056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n This study explores the impact of timebanking, where individuals earn time credits, non-monetary currency, for volunteering, on promoting volunteerism among older adults.\n \n \n \n We employed a quasi-experimental design with 116 timebank group (TBG) participants and 114 comparison group (CG) participants from 2021-2022. TBG received time credits to exchange for rewards, while CG received no time credits (i.e., volunteering as usual). The intervention of timebanking lasted for one year. Volunteering behaviors were tracked via an app, and intentions to volunteer were assessed at baseline (T0), after 6 months (the midpoint of the intervention, T1), and after 12 months (the endpoint of the intervention, T2). The use of rewards by TBG participants was also recorded (e.g., for personal use or sharing with others). Furthermore, focus group interviews were conducted to understand how rewards influenced participants’ volunteerism.\n \n \n \n TBG had significantly higher weekly volunteer hours at T2 (β = 1.37, p = 0.021) and increased intent to volunteer at T1 (β = 0.54, p = 0.001) and T2 (β = 0.51, p = 0.001) compared to CG. Participants using rewards personally volunteered more at T2 (β = 2.09, p = 0.014), although sharing rewards with family and friends or donating rewards to others did not yield the same effect. The qualitative study suggested that a sense of feeling recognized generated by timebanking may encourage increased volunteering and that personal reward use enriched the volunteer experience, and individuals sharing rewards with family and friends experienced a sense of fulfillment and reinforcement of their prosociality.\n \n \n \n Timebanking effectively encourages late-life volunteering. The study provides practical implications for promoting volunteering among older people.\n","PeriodicalId":507173,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"8 51","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the impact of timebanking, where individuals earn time credits, non-monetary currency, for volunteering, on promoting volunteerism among older adults. We employed a quasi-experimental design with 116 timebank group (TBG) participants and 114 comparison group (CG) participants from 2021-2022. TBG received time credits to exchange for rewards, while CG received no time credits (i.e., volunteering as usual). The intervention of timebanking lasted for one year. Volunteering behaviors were tracked via an app, and intentions to volunteer were assessed at baseline (T0), after 6 months (the midpoint of the intervention, T1), and after 12 months (the endpoint of the intervention, T2). The use of rewards by TBG participants was also recorded (e.g., for personal use or sharing with others). Furthermore, focus group interviews were conducted to understand how rewards influenced participants’ volunteerism. TBG had significantly higher weekly volunteer hours at T2 (β = 1.37, p = 0.021) and increased intent to volunteer at T1 (β = 0.54, p = 0.001) and T2 (β = 0.51, p = 0.001) compared to CG. Participants using rewards personally volunteered more at T2 (β = 2.09, p = 0.014), although sharing rewards with family and friends or donating rewards to others did not yield the same effect. The qualitative study suggested that a sense of feeling recognized generated by timebanking may encourage increased volunteering and that personal reward use enriched the volunteer experience, and individuals sharing rewards with family and friends experienced a sense of fulfillment and reinforcement of their prosociality. Timebanking effectively encourages late-life volunteering. The study provides practical implications for promoting volunteering among older people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过时间银行促进晚年志愿服务:香港的准实验性混合方法研究
本研究探讨了时间银行(个人通过志愿服务获得时间积分,即非货币货币)对促进老年人志愿服务的影响。 我们采用了准实验设计,在 2021 年至 2022 年期间招募了 116 名时间银行组(TBG)参与者和 114 名对比组(CG)参与者。TBG 获得时间积分以换取奖励,而 CG 则不获得时间积分(即照常志愿服务)。时间银行的干预措施持续一年。志愿服务行为通过一个应用程序进行跟踪,志愿服务意向在基线(T0)、6 个月后(干预中点,T1)和 12 个月后(干预终点,T2)进行评估。此外,还记录了 TBG 参与者使用奖励的情况(如用于个人或与他人分享)。此外,还进行了焦点小组访谈,以了解奖励如何影响参与者的志愿服务。 与 CG 相比,TBG 在 T1(β = 0.54,p = 0.001)和 T2(β = 0.51,p = 0.001)阶段的每周志愿服务时数明显增加(β = 1.37,p = 0.021)。尽管与家人和朋友分享奖励或将奖励捐献给他人并没有产生同样的效果,但在 T2 阶段,使用奖励的参与者个人自愿性更高(β = 2.09,p = 0.014)。定性研究表明,时间银行产生的被认可感可能会鼓励志愿服务的增加,个人奖励的使用丰富了志愿服务体验,而与家人和朋友分享奖励的个人则体验到了成就感,并强化了他们的亲社会性。 时间银行有效地鼓励了晚年志愿服务。这项研究为促进老年人志愿服务提供了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Loneliness among Older Adults: The Role of Income and Education as Mediators Feeling younger on active summer days? On the interplay of behavioral and environmental factors with day-to-day variability in subjective age Mechanical Property, Efficacy, and User Experience of An Innovative Wearable Device in Preventing Fall-Induced Injuries Physical frailty and the risk of degenerative valvular heart disease The Efficacy of a Home-Based Functional Skills Training Program for Older Adults With and Without a Cognitive Impairment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1