Healthcare providers knowledge and use of psychological and psychoSOCIAL screening and interventions in the management of patients with tendinopathy: An International Survey of Practice

M. Kenyon, S. O'Neil, L. English, A. Mallows, M. Lee, C. Stubbs, S. McAuliffe, G. Stephens, Briggs-Price, Kirwan S., P.
{"title":"Healthcare providers knowledge and use of psychological and psychoSOCIAL screening and interventions in the management of patients with tendinopathy: An International Survey of Practice","authors":"M. Kenyon, S. O'Neil, L. English, A. Mallows, M. Lee, C. Stubbs, S. McAuliffe, G. Stephens, Briggs-Price, Kirwan S., P.","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.05.24308397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Title Clinician examination of Psychological and Psychosocial factors during management of patients with tendinopathy: An International Survey of Practice Background Psychological and psychosocial factors play an important role in the management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Currently, there is no information exploring how clinicians current practice is informed by these factors in the people with tendinopathy exists. Objectives To explore healthcare providers knowledge and use of psychological and social screening and interventions in the management of patients with tendinopathy Methods An online survey was developed by a group of tendon experts. The survey was disseminated via special interest groups, social networks and professional organisations internationally. Results The survey had 103 completed responses. The majority of respondents used the subjective, 53% (N=55), subjective and objective, 28%(n=29), or objective 6% (n=6) examination to screen for psychological factors using both verbal and nonverbal methods. Psychosocial factors were screened for during the subjective assessment by 75% (n=77) of respondents. A further 15% (n=15) screened during the subjective and objective combined whilst 5% (n=5) examined this factor in the objective assessment in isolation. Psychological screening tools were used by 25% (n= 26) of respondents and psychosocial factors by 12% (n=12) of respondents. Treatment typically comprised of individualised education, reassurance, addressing mal-adaptive behaviours and behaviour change. Confidence in assessment and treatment was mixed and clinicians identified a desire for more specific training and self-development. Conclusion The proportion of clinicians screening and measuring psychological and psychosocial factors in clinical practice is high, but few use validated tools due to a lack of time and confidence. Implication for clinical practice Clinicians commonly assess psychological and social factors during assessment of individuals with tendinopathy, as part of their subjective and objective assessments. It is unclear how successfully clinicians identify these factors during their assessments, as they rarely use validated screening tools. Key words Tendinopathy, psychological factors, social factors, holistic, biopsychosocial Funding None.","PeriodicalId":506788,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.05.24308397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Title Clinician examination of Psychological and Psychosocial factors during management of patients with tendinopathy: An International Survey of Practice Background Psychological and psychosocial factors play an important role in the management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Currently, there is no information exploring how clinicians current practice is informed by these factors in the people with tendinopathy exists. Objectives To explore healthcare providers knowledge and use of psychological and social screening and interventions in the management of patients with tendinopathy Methods An online survey was developed by a group of tendon experts. The survey was disseminated via special interest groups, social networks and professional organisations internationally. Results The survey had 103 completed responses. The majority of respondents used the subjective, 53% (N=55), subjective and objective, 28%(n=29), or objective 6% (n=6) examination to screen for psychological factors using both verbal and nonverbal methods. Psychosocial factors were screened for during the subjective assessment by 75% (n=77) of respondents. A further 15% (n=15) screened during the subjective and objective combined whilst 5% (n=5) examined this factor in the objective assessment in isolation. Psychological screening tools were used by 25% (n= 26) of respondents and psychosocial factors by 12% (n=12) of respondents. Treatment typically comprised of individualised education, reassurance, addressing mal-adaptive behaviours and behaviour change. Confidence in assessment and treatment was mixed and clinicians identified a desire for more specific training and self-development. Conclusion The proportion of clinicians screening and measuring psychological and psychosocial factors in clinical practice is high, but few use validated tools due to a lack of time and confidence. Implication for clinical practice Clinicians commonly assess psychological and social factors during assessment of individuals with tendinopathy, as part of their subjective and objective assessments. It is unclear how successfully clinicians identify these factors during their assessments, as they rarely use validated screening tools. Key words Tendinopathy, psychological factors, social factors, holistic, biopsychosocial Funding None.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗服务提供者在管理腱鞘病患者时对心理和社会心理筛查及干预措施的了解和使用:国际实践调查
标题 临床医生在治疗腱鞘炎患者过程中对心理和社会心理因素的检查:背景 心理和社会心理因素在肌肉骨骼疾病患者的治疗过程中发挥着重要作用。目前,尚无资料探讨临床医生在治疗腱鞘病患者时如何从这些因素中获益。方法 一组肌腱专家开发了一项在线调查。调查通过特殊兴趣小组、社交网络和国际专业组织进行传播。结果 有 103 人完成了调查。大多数受访者使用主观检查(53%(N=55))、主观和客观检查(28%(N=29))或客观检查(6%(N=6)),通过口头和非口头方法筛查心理因素。75%(n=77)的受访者在主观评估中筛查了心理因素。另有 15%(n=15)的受访者在主观和客观相结合的评估中进行了筛查,而 5%(n=5)的受访者在客观评估中单独检查了这一因素。25%(n=26)的受访者使用了心理筛查工具,12%(n=12)的受访者使用了社会心理因素。治疗通常包括个性化教育、安抚、解决不良适应行为和行为改变。临床医生对评估和治疗的信心参差不齐,并表示希望获得更具体的培训和自我发展。结论 临床医生在临床实践中筛查和测量心理和社会心理因素的比例很高,但由于缺乏时间和信心,很少使用经过验证的工具。对临床实践的启示 临床医生在对腱鞘炎患者进行评估时,通常会对心理和社会因素进行评估,作为主观和客观评估的一部分。由于临床医生很少使用经过验证的筛查工具,因此尚不清楚他们在评估过程中如何成功地识别这些因素。关键词 腱鞘炎、心理因素、社会因素、整体性、生物心理社会 资助 无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reemergence of Oropouche virus between 2023 and 2024 in Brazil Towards Personalized Breast Cancer Risk Management: A Thai Cohort Study on Polygenic Risk Scores Hot Spring Residency and Disease Association: a Crossover Gene-Environment Interaction (GxE) Study in Taiwan Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D in renal cancer Dual exposure-by-polygenic score interactions highlight disparities across social groups in the proportion needed to benefit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1