Students attitudes on STACK content: A pilot study at the university of Trieste, Italy

Zevick Otieno Juma, Elisabetta Chelleri, Daniel Doz, Danilo Lewanski
{"title":"Students attitudes on STACK content: A pilot study at the university of Trieste, Italy","authors":"Zevick Otieno Juma, Elisabetta Chelleri, Daniel Doz, Danilo Lewanski","doi":"10.58524/jasme.v4i1.357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Online examinations are increasingly prevalent in educational settings, offering innovative assessment methods. Understanding student perceptions and experiences with such systems is essential for enhancing their effectiveness and acceptance in educational practice.Aims: This pilot study aimed to examine the impact of STACK-based online exams on various facets such as student comfort, perceived value for learning and exam preparation, preferences between pen-and-paper versus STACK formats, confidence in online math tests, readiness to adopt online assessment platforms, and overall perspectives on online evaluations.Method: An experimental within-subjects design and convenience sampling were used to involve 117 first-year biology students enrolled in a Probability and Statistics course, who were already familiar with the STACK system. Data were collected using pre- and post-exam online surveys featuring five-point Likert scale questions and an open-ended query.Results: The findings indicate that students felt more comfortable using the STACK system after the study and preferred it over traditional exams. Nevertheless, some students expressed uncertainty about using STACK content for final exams due to concerns about its effectiveness in evaluating critical thinking and potential technical difficulties. However, concerns regarding technical challenges decreased significantly post-exam, with no technical issues reported during the exam. Positive feedback highlighted STACK's benefits for formative assessment, easier learning, immediate feedback, and its practicality and innovation. Some students even suggested incorporating STACK into final exams for convenience and advocated for further investment in the STACK system, possibly with improved content. Conclusion: In summary, students preferred using STACK for exams, though concerns about technical glitches and the need to refine content for assessing critical thinking persist. Future efforts should focus on enhancing content quality, starting this summer.","PeriodicalId":140761,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education","volume":"2 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v4i1.357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Online examinations are increasingly prevalent in educational settings, offering innovative assessment methods. Understanding student perceptions and experiences with such systems is essential for enhancing their effectiveness and acceptance in educational practice.Aims: This pilot study aimed to examine the impact of STACK-based online exams on various facets such as student comfort, perceived value for learning and exam preparation, preferences between pen-and-paper versus STACK formats, confidence in online math tests, readiness to adopt online assessment platforms, and overall perspectives on online evaluations.Method: An experimental within-subjects design and convenience sampling were used to involve 117 first-year biology students enrolled in a Probability and Statistics course, who were already familiar with the STACK system. Data were collected using pre- and post-exam online surveys featuring five-point Likert scale questions and an open-ended query.Results: The findings indicate that students felt more comfortable using the STACK system after the study and preferred it over traditional exams. Nevertheless, some students expressed uncertainty about using STACK content for final exams due to concerns about its effectiveness in evaluating critical thinking and potential technical difficulties. However, concerns regarding technical challenges decreased significantly post-exam, with no technical issues reported during the exam. Positive feedback highlighted STACK's benefits for formative assessment, easier learning, immediate feedback, and its practicality and innovation. Some students even suggested incorporating STACK into final exams for convenience and advocated for further investment in the STACK system, possibly with improved content. Conclusion: In summary, students preferred using STACK for exams, though concerns about technical glitches and the need to refine content for assessing critical thinking persist. Future efforts should focus on enhancing content quality, starting this summer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生对 STACK 内容的态度:意大利的里雅斯特大学试点研究
背景:在线考试在教育环境中越来越普遍,提供了创新的评估方法。目的:本试验性研究旨在考察基于 STACK 的在线考试对各方面的影响,如学生的舒适度、对学习和备考的感知价值、对纸笔考试和 STACK 考试形式的偏好、对在线数学考试的信心、采用在线评估平台的准备情况以及对在线评估的总体看法:采用实验性主体内设计和方便抽样的方法,让117名已经熟悉STACK系统的生物系一年级学生参与概率与统计课程的学习。数据收集采用了考前和考后在线调查的方式,其中包括五点李克特量表问题和开放式询问:调查结果表明,学生在学习后对 STACK 系统的使用更加得心应手,与传统考试相比,他们更喜欢 STACK 系统。然而,一些学生对在期末考试中使用 STACK 内容表示不确定,因为他们担心该系统在评价批判性思维方面的有效性以及潜在的技术难题。不过,考试后对技术难题的担忧明显减少,考试期间没有出现任何技术问题。积极的反馈意见强调了 STACK 在形成性评估、轻松学习、即时反馈方面的优势,以及它的实用性和创新性。一些学生甚至建议将 STACK 纳入期末考试,以方便学习,并主张对 STACK 系统进行进一步投资,并可能改进其内容。结论总之,学生们更喜欢在考试中使用 STACK,但对技术故障和需要改进批判性思维评估内容的担忧依然存在。从今年夏天开始,今后的工作重点应放在提高内容质量上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How do students' attitudes and mathematics teachers' self-efficacy impact students' achievement in mathematics? Structural quality assessment of the villagemath instructional content platform Students attitudes on STACK content: A pilot study at the university of Trieste, Italy Ubuntulisation of mathematics classroom for the enhancement of learner’s interest and achievement Impact of problem-based learning strategy on learning outcomes of senior secondary school student in mathematics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1