Physical model test study on strength characteristics of gravel pile composite foundation

IF 1.2 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1680/jphmg.23.00046
Jia-Hui Wang, Ji-Wei Jiang, Yi-Fei Sun, Bao-tian Wang, Shao-Yang Han, Jin-Yu Zuo, Wen-Wei Li, Yang Tang
{"title":"Physical model test study on strength characteristics of gravel pile composite foundation","authors":"Jia-Hui Wang, Ji-Wei Jiang, Yi-Fei Sun, Bao-tian Wang, Shao-Yang Han, Jin-Yu Zuo, Wen-Wei Li, Yang Tang","doi":"10.1680/jphmg.23.00046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In gravel pile composite foundation stability design, the shear strength of composite foundation is critically important. However, due to the size limitation of test equipment, it is difficult to obtain its shear strength in field. This study designs a laboratory shear model test to obtain the shear strength of gravel pile composite foundation, where a total of four group tests were carried out, including two nature soils and two gravel pile area replacement ratios. The shear strength parameters obtained by the shear model tests are compared with the results of empirical formula methods such as the Chinese Standard Method and Priebe Method to verify the accuracy of these two methods. It is demonstrated that for the Chinese Standard Method, the empirical formula's results are smaller than the shear model test results when the pile-soil stress ratio b is 1. When the pile-soil stress ratio b is 1.5, the results are close to each other. For the Priebe Method, the empirical formula results are all larger than the shear model test results, and it is especially unsuitable for the mud soil.","PeriodicalId":48816,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.23.00046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In gravel pile composite foundation stability design, the shear strength of composite foundation is critically important. However, due to the size limitation of test equipment, it is difficult to obtain its shear strength in field. This study designs a laboratory shear model test to obtain the shear strength of gravel pile composite foundation, where a total of four group tests were carried out, including two nature soils and two gravel pile area replacement ratios. The shear strength parameters obtained by the shear model tests are compared with the results of empirical formula methods such as the Chinese Standard Method and Priebe Method to verify the accuracy of these two methods. It is demonstrated that for the Chinese Standard Method, the empirical formula's results are smaller than the shear model test results when the pile-soil stress ratio b is 1. When the pile-soil stress ratio b is 1.5, the results are close to each other. For the Priebe Method, the empirical formula results are all larger than the shear model test results, and it is especially unsuitable for the mud soil.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
砾石桩复合地基强度特性的物理模型试验研究
在碎石桩复合地基稳定性设计中,复合地基的抗剪强度至关重要。然而,由于试验设备的尺寸限制,很难在现场获得其抗剪强度。本研究设计了一种实验室剪切模型试验来获取碎石桩复合地基的剪切强度,共进行了四组试验,包括两种性质土和两种碎石桩面积置换比。将剪切模型试验获得的剪切强度参数与中国标准法和普里贝法等经验公式法的结果进行比较,以验证这两种方法的准确性。结果表明,对于中国标准法,当桩土应力比 b 为 1 时,经验公式的结果小于剪切模型试验的结果;当桩土应力比 b 为 1.5 时,两者的结果接近。对于普里贝法,经验公式结果均大于剪切模型试验结果,尤其不适合泥土。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
15.80%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics contains the latest research and analysis in all areas of physical modelling at any scale, including modelling at single gravity and at multiple gravities on a centrifuge, shaking table and pressure chamber testing and geoenvironmental experiments.
期刊最新文献
Effect of facing stiffness on GRS walls under surcharge loading-unloading Centrifuge modelling of groundwater variation induced settlement using different scaling methods Physical model test study on strength characteristics of gravel pile composite foundation Pressure and thermal effects on Rayleigh fiber-optic strain measurment for soil-structure interaction Scaling laws for the modelling of energy geostructures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1