Continuity and Innovation in Pottery Technology: The Karst Region (North-East Italy) from Neolithic to Early Bronze Age

IF 2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Heritage Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.3390/heritage7060139
Federico Bernardini, M. Montagnari Kokelj, M. Velicogna, Nicolò Barago, Davide Lenaz, Angelo De Min, Elena Leghissa
{"title":"Continuity and Innovation in Pottery Technology: The Karst Region (North-East Italy) from Neolithic to Early Bronze Age","authors":"Federico Bernardini, M. Montagnari Kokelj, M. Velicogna, Nicolò Barago, Davide Lenaz, Angelo De Min, Elena Leghissa","doi":"10.3390/heritage7060139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the development of pottery technology in the Trieste Karst region (North-East Italy) from the Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age (EBA). It also seeks to identify cultural links with other areas by examining potentially imported vessels. Archaeometric analyses (X-ray diffraction and optical microscopy) reveal significant differences between Neolithic ceramics (Danilo–Vlaška Group) and the majority of Late Copper Age (LCA)/Early Bronze Age (EBA) pottery (primarily associated with the Ljubljana Culture and a few with the Cetina Culture). Neolithic pottery displays consistent characteristics across all vessel types, including coarse grain, prevalent sparry calcite temper, and the absence of grog. In contrast, most LCA and EBA vessels exhibit distinct features such as very fine-grained paste, no sparry calcite, notable use of grog temper, higher quartz, muscovite, and flint content. Notably, from a technological perspective, the analyzed Cetina vessels bear a strong resemblance to the majority of LCA ceramics. The differences between Neolithic and LCA/EBA vessels clearly suggest the use of new raw materials, recipes, and techniques, likely reflecting changes in cultural and social contexts and potential connections with the core area of the Ljubljana Culture.","PeriodicalId":12934,"journal":{"name":"Heritage","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7060139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the development of pottery technology in the Trieste Karst region (North-East Italy) from the Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age (EBA). It also seeks to identify cultural links with other areas by examining potentially imported vessels. Archaeometric analyses (X-ray diffraction and optical microscopy) reveal significant differences between Neolithic ceramics (Danilo–Vlaška Group) and the majority of Late Copper Age (LCA)/Early Bronze Age (EBA) pottery (primarily associated with the Ljubljana Culture and a few with the Cetina Culture). Neolithic pottery displays consistent characteristics across all vessel types, including coarse grain, prevalent sparry calcite temper, and the absence of grog. In contrast, most LCA and EBA vessels exhibit distinct features such as very fine-grained paste, no sparry calcite, notable use of grog temper, higher quartz, muscovite, and flint content. Notably, from a technological perspective, the analyzed Cetina vessels bear a strong resemblance to the majority of LCA ceramics. The differences between Neolithic and LCA/EBA vessels clearly suggest the use of new raw materials, recipes, and techniques, likely reflecting changes in cultural and social contexts and potential connections with the core area of the Ljubljana Culture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
陶器技术的延续与创新:从新石器时代到青铜时代早期的喀斯特地区(意大利东北部
本文探讨了的里雅斯特喀斯特地区(意大利东北部)从新石器时代到青铜时代早期(EBA)的陶器技术发展。本文还试图通过研究潜在的进口器皿来确定与其他地区的文化联系。考古计量分析(X 射线衍射和光学显微镜)显示,新石器时代陶器(达尼洛-弗拉什卡组)与大多数晚铜器时代(LCA)/早青铜时代(EBA)陶器(主要与卢布尔雅那文化有关,少数与切蒂娜文化有关)之间存在显著差异。新石器时代的陶器在所有器皿类型中都显示出一致的特征,包括粗粒、普遍的疏松方解石质和无釉。与此相反,大多数 LCA 和 EBA 陶器表现出明显的特征,如糊状物非常细腻,没有疏松的方解石,明显使用格罗格回火,石英、麝香石和燧石含量较高。值得注意的是,从技术角度来看,所分析的塞蒂纳器皿与大多数 LCA 陶瓷非常相似。新石器时代器皿与 LCA/EBA 器皿之间的差异清楚地表明使用了新的原材料、配方和技术,这很可能反映了文化和社会背景的变化以及与卢布尔雅那文化核心区域的潜在联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heritage
Heritage Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploitation, Transport, and Circulation of the Rohri Hills Chert (Sindh, Pakistan) during the Indus Period Characterization of Bloom Iron Smelting Site Remains in Pržanj, Slovenia On the Identification of the a fresco or a secco Preparative Technique of Wall Paintings Sustainable Conservation of Architectural Heritage to Reduce Environmental Impact: The Morocco Pavilion on Cartuja Island in Seville Earthen Architectural Heritage in the Gourara Region of Algeria: Building Typology, Materials, and Techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1