QUANTITATIVE MULTISTAGE FRACTURING EFFICIENCY EVALUATION USING CROSS-WELL STRAIN MEASUREMENTS

Joseph Mjehovich, Ge Jin, K. Wu
{"title":"QUANTITATIVE MULTISTAGE FRACTURING EFFICIENCY EVALUATION USING CROSS-WELL STRAIN MEASUREMENTS","authors":"Joseph Mjehovich, Ge Jin, K. Wu","doi":"10.1190/int-2023-0083.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crosswell strain measurements acquired through low-frequency Distributed Acoustic Sensing (LF-DAS) is a maturing technique used to monitor and diagnose the efficiency of hydraulic fracturing treatments. While LF-DAS has demonstrated potential in characterizing far-field fracture communication and geometry, the prevailing analysis in this field has historically relied on qualitative interpretations, focusing on the timing and location of frac hits. In response to the evolving landscape of quantitative studies in this area, we present an advanced quantitative technique using our novel Green-function based inversion algorithm to calculate time-dependent far-field fracture width. The adopted algorithm utilizes the 3D displacement discontinuity method to relate fracture aperture to strains measured by LF-DAS along a monitor well during stimulation treatments. This approach is demonstrated on a subset of four treatment stages where Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) and Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS) were acquired within the injection well, alongside LF-DAS from a nearby monitor well. LF-DAS inversion results indicate the loss of zonal isolation in three of the monitored stages, leading to significantly smaller fracture widths at the monitor well for targeted treatment stages, and reactivated fractures in the adjacent previous stages. These interpretations are cross validated through the integration of in-well DAS and DTS analysis, where severe inter-stage fluid communication is observed. The inverted fracture widths quantify the impact on far-field fracture geometry associated with poor stage isolation and decreased fracturing efficiency. This new approach demonstrates the potential of LF-DAS for quantitative analysis and interpretation, facilitating improved understanding and optimization of hydraulic stimulation, going beyond its conventional qualitative role in fracturing diagnostics.","PeriodicalId":502519,"journal":{"name":"Interpretation","volume":"51 50","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interpretation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1190/int-2023-0083.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crosswell strain measurements acquired through low-frequency Distributed Acoustic Sensing (LF-DAS) is a maturing technique used to monitor and diagnose the efficiency of hydraulic fracturing treatments. While LF-DAS has demonstrated potential in characterizing far-field fracture communication and geometry, the prevailing analysis in this field has historically relied on qualitative interpretations, focusing on the timing and location of frac hits. In response to the evolving landscape of quantitative studies in this area, we present an advanced quantitative technique using our novel Green-function based inversion algorithm to calculate time-dependent far-field fracture width. The adopted algorithm utilizes the 3D displacement discontinuity method to relate fracture aperture to strains measured by LF-DAS along a monitor well during stimulation treatments. This approach is demonstrated on a subset of four treatment stages where Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) and Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS) were acquired within the injection well, alongside LF-DAS from a nearby monitor well. LF-DAS inversion results indicate the loss of zonal isolation in three of the monitored stages, leading to significantly smaller fracture widths at the monitor well for targeted treatment stages, and reactivated fractures in the adjacent previous stages. These interpretations are cross validated through the integration of in-well DAS and DTS analysis, where severe inter-stage fluid communication is observed. The inverted fracture widths quantify the impact on far-field fracture geometry associated with poor stage isolation and decreased fracturing efficiency. This new approach demonstrates the potential of LF-DAS for quantitative analysis and interpretation, facilitating improved understanding and optimization of hydraulic stimulation, going beyond its conventional qualitative role in fracturing diagnostics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用跨井应变测量对多级压裂效率进行定量评估
通过低频分布式声学传感(LF-DAS)获得的横井应变测量是一项成熟的技术,用于监测和诊断水力压裂处理的效率。虽然 LF-DAS 在表征远场裂缝沟通和几何形状方面已显示出潜力,但这一领域的主流分析历来依赖于定性解释,侧重于压裂命中的时间和位置。针对该领域定量研究的不断发展,我们提出了一种先进的定量技术,使用基于格林函数的新型反演算法来计算随时间变化的远场裂缝宽度。所采用的算法利用三维位移不连续法,将压裂孔径与 LF-DAS 测量到的应变联系起来,并沿监测井在射孔处理过程中进行测量。在注入井内采集分布式声学传感(DAS)和分布式温度传感(DTS)以及附近监测井的 LF-DAS 时,对四个处理阶段的子集进行了演示。LF-DAS 反演结果表明,三个监测层段失去了带状隔离,导致监测井中目标处理层段的裂缝宽度明显变小,相邻前几个层段的裂缝重新活化。通过整合井内 DAS 和 DTS 分析,这些解释得到了交叉验证。倒置裂缝宽度量化了远场裂缝几何形状受到的影响,这些影响与阶段隔离不良和压裂效率降低有关。这种新方法展示了 LF-DAS 在定量分析和解释方面的潜力,有助于更好地理解和优化水力刺激,超越了其在压裂诊断中的传统定性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
REGIONALIZED MULTIPLE-POINT STATISTICAL SIMULATION FOR CALIBRATING PROCESS-BASED GEOLOGICAL MODELS TO SEISMIC DATA Pore and Fracture Pressures prediction – new geomechanic approach in Deepwater Salt Overthrusts, Case histories from Gulf of Mexico SEISMIC REFLECTION DATA INTERPRETATION AND PETROPHYSICAL EVALUATION OF MEYAL AREA, POTWAR BASIN, PAKISTAN A petrophysically driven seismic inversion method for TOC content of hydrocarbon source rocks Poisson's Ratio-LambdaRho rock physics templates and a study on sensitivity of different fluid indicators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1