Pore and Fracture Pressures prediction – new geomechanic approach in Deepwater Salt Overthrusts, Case histories from Gulf of Mexico

S. Shaker
{"title":"Pore and Fracture Pressures prediction – new geomechanic approach in Deepwater Salt Overthrusts, Case histories from Gulf of Mexico","authors":"S. Shaker","doi":"10.1190/int-2023-0109.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Along this active exploration belt, applying the conventional effective stress methods and algorithms, where maximum stress (S1) is vertical would lead to unintended and unrealistic results. In the frontier active thrust belt of the Gulf of Mexico, the unique geomechanical setting of S1 as the lateral salt creep, and the minimum (S3) as the OB greatly impact the formation geopressure framework. The buoyancy of thick salt produces two different pressure gradients above and below the salt. Moreover, the inclusion of rafted sediments in the salt and the plowing rubble zone at the salt base substantially affect the pore and fracture pressures (PP-FP) profiles. These proceeding geological setting were the foundation for the conceptual framework. Building an alternative pre-drilling prediction numerical model based on this anomalous geomechanical settings and the lack of adequate seismic velocity is a challenge. All the available measured or pertained PP-FP data from key wells were tabulated. Prediction models were established by correlating the populated database and generating the empirical algorithm for each data gather. A substantial discrepancy between above and below the salt where high pressure gradient (PG) in the sediment above the salt and slow PG development below the salt. A considerable regressive pressure (average 2 ppg) in both PP-FP subsalt section. The PP within the salt is contingent on the presence of sediment inclusions and a substantial FP drop in the rubble zone leads to extensive loss of mud circulation. The trend lines of each data gather led to generating two depth dependent equations for the PP-FP above and within the salt and two others for the subsalt. The prediction models were validated against blind data set. Before drilling, this model establishes the PP-FP vs. sediment subsea depth in an abnormal geomechanical setting and the lack of coherent seismic velocity for PP -FP prediction.","PeriodicalId":502519,"journal":{"name":"Interpretation","volume":"31 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interpretation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1190/int-2023-0109.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Along this active exploration belt, applying the conventional effective stress methods and algorithms, where maximum stress (S1) is vertical would lead to unintended and unrealistic results. In the frontier active thrust belt of the Gulf of Mexico, the unique geomechanical setting of S1 as the lateral salt creep, and the minimum (S3) as the OB greatly impact the formation geopressure framework. The buoyancy of thick salt produces two different pressure gradients above and below the salt. Moreover, the inclusion of rafted sediments in the salt and the plowing rubble zone at the salt base substantially affect the pore and fracture pressures (PP-FP) profiles. These proceeding geological setting were the foundation for the conceptual framework. Building an alternative pre-drilling prediction numerical model based on this anomalous geomechanical settings and the lack of adequate seismic velocity is a challenge. All the available measured or pertained PP-FP data from key wells were tabulated. Prediction models were established by correlating the populated database and generating the empirical algorithm for each data gather. A substantial discrepancy between above and below the salt where high pressure gradient (PG) in the sediment above the salt and slow PG development below the salt. A considerable regressive pressure (average 2 ppg) in both PP-FP subsalt section. The PP within the salt is contingent on the presence of sediment inclusions and a substantial FP drop in the rubble zone leads to extensive loss of mud circulation. The trend lines of each data gather led to generating two depth dependent equations for the PP-FP above and within the salt and two others for the subsalt. The prediction models were validated against blind data set. Before drilling, this model establishes the PP-FP vs. sediment subsea depth in an abnormal geomechanical setting and the lack of coherent seismic velocity for PP -FP prediction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孔隙和断裂压力预测--深水盐覆盖层的新地质力学方法,墨西哥湾的案例研究
在这一活跃的勘探带中,应用传统的有效应力方法和算法,即最大应力(S1)为垂直应力,会导致意外的、不切实际的结果。在墨西哥湾前沿活动推力带,S1 作为横向盐蠕变,而最小应力(S3)为 OB,这种独特的地质力学环境对地层地压框架有很大影响。厚盐的浮力在盐的上方和下方产生两种不同的压力梯度。此外,盐层中的筏状沉积物和盐层底部的耕作碎石带也对孔隙压力和裂缝压力(PP-FP)剖面产生了重大影响。这些进行中的地质环境是概念框架的基础。在这种异常地质力学环境和缺乏足够地震速度的情况下,建立一个可供选择的钻前预测数值模型是一项挑战。主要油井的所有可用测量或相关 PP-FP 数据均已列表。通过对数据库中的数据进行关联,并为每个数据集生成经验算法,建立了预测模型。盐上和盐下之间存在巨大差异,盐上沉积物压力梯度(PG)高,而盐下压力梯度发展缓慢。在 PP-FP 盐下剖面,压力有相当大的倒退(平均 2 ppg)。盐内的压力梯度取决于沉积物夹杂物的存在,碎石区的压力梯度大幅下降导致泥浆循环的广泛丧失。根据各数据收集的趋势线,生成了两个与深度相关的盐上和盐下 PP-FP 方程,以及另外两个盐下 PP-FP 方程。预测模型根据盲数据集进行了验证。在钻井前,该模型确定了在异常地质力学环境下 PP-FP 与沉积物水下深度的关系,以及缺乏用于 PP-FP 预测的相干地震速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
REGIONALIZED MULTIPLE-POINT STATISTICAL SIMULATION FOR CALIBRATING PROCESS-BASED GEOLOGICAL MODELS TO SEISMIC DATA Pore and Fracture Pressures prediction – new geomechanic approach in Deepwater Salt Overthrusts, Case histories from Gulf of Mexico SEISMIC REFLECTION DATA INTERPRETATION AND PETROPHYSICAL EVALUATION OF MEYAL AREA, POTWAR BASIN, PAKISTAN A petrophysically driven seismic inversion method for TOC content of hydrocarbon source rocks Poisson's Ratio-LambdaRho rock physics templates and a study on sensitivity of different fluid indicators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1