Effect of synthetic CT on dose-derived toxicity predictors for MR-only prostate radiotherapy

BJR|Open Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1093/bjro/tzae014
Christopher Thomas, Isabel Dregely, I. Oksuz, Teresa Guerrero Urbano, T. Greener, Andrew P King, Sally F Barrington
{"title":"Effect of synthetic CT on dose-derived toxicity predictors for MR-only prostate radiotherapy","authors":"Christopher Thomas, Isabel Dregely, I. Oksuz, Teresa Guerrero Urbano, T. Greener, Andrew P King, Sally F Barrington","doi":"10.1093/bjro/tzae014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Toxicity-driven adaptive radiotherapy (RT) is enhanced by the superior soft tissue contrast of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging compared with conventional computed tomography (CT). However, in an MR-only RT pathway synthetic CTs (sCT) are required for dose calculation. This study evaluates 3 sCT approaches for accurate rectal toxicity prediction in prostate RT.\n \n \n \n Thirty-six patients had MR (T2-weighted acquisition optimised for anatomical delineation, and T1-Dixon) with same day standard-of-care planning CT for prostate RT. Multiple sCT were created per patient using bulk density (BD), tissue stratification (TS, from T1-Dixon) and deep-learning (DL) artificial intelligence (AI) (from T2-weighted) approaches for dose distribution calculation and creation of rectal dose volume histograms (DVH) and dose surface maps (DSM) to assess grade-2 (G2) rectal bleeding risk.\n \n \n \n Maximum absolute errors using sCT for DVH-based G2 rectal bleeding risk (risk range 1.6% to 6.1%) were 0.6% (BD), 0.3% (TS) and 0.1% (DL). DSM-derived risk prediction errors followed a similar pattern. DL sCT has voxel-wise density generated from T2-weighted MR and improved accuracy for both risk-prediction methods.\n \n \n \n DL improves dosimetric and predicted risk calculation accuracy. Both TS and DL methods are clinically suitable for sCT generation in toxicity-guided RT, however DL offers increased accuracy and offers efficiencies by removing the need for T1-Dixon MR.\n \n \n \n This study demonstrates novel insights regarding the effect of sCT on predictive toxicity metrics, demonstrating clear accuracy improvement with increased sCT resolution. Accuracy of toxicity calculation in MR-only RT should be assessed for all treatment sites where dose to critical structures will guide adaptive-RT strategies.\n","PeriodicalId":516126,"journal":{"name":"BJR|Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJR|Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjro/tzae014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Toxicity-driven adaptive radiotherapy (RT) is enhanced by the superior soft tissue contrast of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging compared with conventional computed tomography (CT). However, in an MR-only RT pathway synthetic CTs (sCT) are required for dose calculation. This study evaluates 3 sCT approaches for accurate rectal toxicity prediction in prostate RT. Thirty-six patients had MR (T2-weighted acquisition optimised for anatomical delineation, and T1-Dixon) with same day standard-of-care planning CT for prostate RT. Multiple sCT were created per patient using bulk density (BD), tissue stratification (TS, from T1-Dixon) and deep-learning (DL) artificial intelligence (AI) (from T2-weighted) approaches for dose distribution calculation and creation of rectal dose volume histograms (DVH) and dose surface maps (DSM) to assess grade-2 (G2) rectal bleeding risk. Maximum absolute errors using sCT for DVH-based G2 rectal bleeding risk (risk range 1.6% to 6.1%) were 0.6% (BD), 0.3% (TS) and 0.1% (DL). DSM-derived risk prediction errors followed a similar pattern. DL sCT has voxel-wise density generated from T2-weighted MR and improved accuracy for both risk-prediction methods. DL improves dosimetric and predicted risk calculation accuracy. Both TS and DL methods are clinically suitable for sCT generation in toxicity-guided RT, however DL offers increased accuracy and offers efficiencies by removing the need for T1-Dixon MR. This study demonstrates novel insights regarding the effect of sCT on predictive toxicity metrics, demonstrating clear accuracy improvement with increased sCT resolution. Accuracy of toxicity calculation in MR-only RT should be assessed for all treatment sites where dose to critical structures will guide adaptive-RT strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合成 CT 对纯磁共振前列腺放射治疗剂量衍生毒性预测指标的影响
与传统的计算机断层扫描(CT)相比,磁共振成像(MR)的软组织对比度更高,从而增强了毒性驱动的自适应放射治疗(RT)。然而,在纯磁共振 RT 途径中,剂量计算需要合成 CT(sCT)。本研究评估了用于准确预测前列腺 RT 直肠毒性的 3 种 sCT 方法。 36名患者在进行前列腺RT治疗的同一天接受了MR(T2-加权采集,优化了解剖轮廓,以及T1-Dixon)和标准计划CT检查。使用体密度(BD)、组织分层(TS,来自 T1-Dixon)和深度学习(DL)人工智能(AI)(来自 T2 加权)方法为每位患者创建多个 sCT,用于剂量分布计算和创建直肠剂量体积直方图(DVH)和剂量表面图(DSM),以评估 2 级(G2)直肠出血风险。 使用 sCT 计算基于 DVH 的 G2 级直肠出血风险(风险范围为 1.6% 到 6.1%)的最大绝对误差分别为 0.6% (BD)、0.3% (TS) 和 0.1% (DL)。DSM 衍生的风险预测误差也遵循类似的模式。DL sCT具有从T2加权磁共振生成的体素密度,提高了两种风险预测方法的准确性。 DL 提高了剂量测定和预测风险计算的准确性。在临床上,TS 和 DL 方法都适用于在毒性引导 RT 中生成 sCT,但 DL 方法无需 T1-Dixon MR,从而提高了准确性和效率。 这项研究就 sCT 对预测毒性指标的影响提出了新的见解,表明随着 sCT 分辨率的提高,准确性也会明显提高。应针对所有治疗部位评估仅磁共振 RT 的毒性计算准确性,因为关键结构的剂量将指导适应性 RT 策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Under the hood”: artificial intelligence in personalized radiotherapy Combined with the semantic features of CT and selected clinical variables, a machine learning model for accurately predicting the prognosis of omicron was established Effect of synthetic CT on dose-derived toxicity predictors for MR-only prostate radiotherapy Celebrating five years of BJR|Open Improving Traumatic Fracture Detection on Radiographs with Artificial Intelligence Support: A Multi-Reader Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1