E. Hoekstra, S. Liem, Saad Ahmed, Nivine Levarht, Cynthia M. Fehres, A. Giucă, N. Ajmone Marsan, Tom WJ Huizinga, J. D. de Vries-Bouwstra
{"title":"Troponin I levels in systemic sclerosis patients with myocardial involvement","authors":"E. Hoekstra, S. Liem, Saad Ahmed, Nivine Levarht, Cynthia M. Fehres, A. Giucă, N. Ajmone Marsan, Tom WJ Huizinga, J. D. de Vries-Bouwstra","doi":"10.1177/23971983241255550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Troponin I has been suggested as a more specific diagnostic biomarker for myocardial involvement in systemic sclerosis than the frequently used troponin T. The aim of this study is to evaluate the additive value of troponin I to detect myocardial involvement in systemic sclerosis. To this end, we evaluated the association between troponin I levels and myocardial involvement in systemic sclerosis patients. A cross-sectional observational study was performed, including 20 healthy controls and four groups of each 20 systemic sclerosis patients from the Leiden Combined Care in Systemic Sclerosis cohort: (1) patients with myocardial involvement, (2) patients with myositis, (3) patients with elevated troponin T and creatine kinase levels but without organ involvement, and (4) patients without any signs of organ involvement. Troponin I levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Troponin I levels were compared between the different groups using the Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests. The mean age of the 80 included patients was 56 years; 61% of the study population was female. Troponin I levels were not significantly different between patients with and without myocardial involvement (2.7 (0.5–15.3) vs 1.2 (0.1–6.6) ng/L; p = 0.117). Systemic sclerosis patients were more often positive for troponin I than healthy controls (70.0% vs 30.0%; p = 0.001). Elevated troponin I was not of additional value to diagnose myocardial involvement in systemic sclerosis patients.","PeriodicalId":506053,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23971983241255550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Troponin I has been suggested as a more specific diagnostic biomarker for myocardial involvement in systemic sclerosis than the frequently used troponin T. The aim of this study is to evaluate the additive value of troponin I to detect myocardial involvement in systemic sclerosis. To this end, we evaluated the association between troponin I levels and myocardial involvement in systemic sclerosis patients. A cross-sectional observational study was performed, including 20 healthy controls and four groups of each 20 systemic sclerosis patients from the Leiden Combined Care in Systemic Sclerosis cohort: (1) patients with myocardial involvement, (2) patients with myositis, (3) patients with elevated troponin T and creatine kinase levels but without organ involvement, and (4) patients without any signs of organ involvement. Troponin I levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Troponin I levels were compared between the different groups using the Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests. The mean age of the 80 included patients was 56 years; 61% of the study population was female. Troponin I levels were not significantly different between patients with and without myocardial involvement (2.7 (0.5–15.3) vs 1.2 (0.1–6.6) ng/L; p = 0.117). Systemic sclerosis patients were more often positive for troponin I than healthy controls (70.0% vs 30.0%; p = 0.001). Elevated troponin I was not of additional value to diagnose myocardial involvement in systemic sclerosis patients.
与常用的肌钙蛋白 T 相比,肌钙蛋白 I 被认为是诊断系统性硬化症心肌受累的更具特异性的生物标志物。这项研究的目的是评估肌钙蛋白 I 在检测系统性硬化症心肌受累方面的附加价值。为此,我们评估了肌钙蛋白 I 水平与系统性硬化症患者心肌受累之间的关联。我们进行了一项横断面观察研究,其中包括 20 名健康对照者和莱顿系统性硬化症联合护理队列中的四组系统性硬化症患者,每组 20 人:(1) 心肌受累患者;(2) 肌炎患者;(3) 肌钙蛋白 T 和肌酸激酶水平升高但无器官受累的患者;(4) 无任何器官受累迹象的患者。肌钙蛋白 I 水平采用酶联免疫吸附测定法进行测量。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较不同组别之间的肌钙蛋白 I 水平。80 名患者的平均年龄为 56 岁,61% 为女性。有心肌受累和无心肌受累患者的肌钙蛋白 I 水平无明显差异(2.7 (0.5-15.3) vs 1.2 (0.1-6.6) ng/L;p = 0.117)。系统性硬化症患者的肌钙蛋白 I 阳性率高于健康对照组(70.0% vs 30.0%;p = 0.001)。肌钙蛋白 I 升高对诊断系统硬化症患者心肌受累没有额外价值。