A sentiment and keyword analysis of college food pantry stigma among users and non-users

Alisa Duong, Ayron Walker, Amanda Bossert, Matthew Arnold
{"title":"A sentiment and keyword analysis of college food pantry stigma among users and non-users","authors":"Alisa Duong, Ayron Walker, Amanda Bossert, Matthew Arnold","doi":"10.5304/jafscd.2024.133.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Food pantry stigma among college students has been documented as an issue that impacts the utili­zation of resources but has not been deeply investi­gated. The objective of this study was to explore sources of food pantry stigma to identify different strategies to encourage food pantry use, which has the potential to positively alter methods on cam­puses. This mixed-methods study was a branched (separate questions and responses from both food pantry users and nonusers), 51-item, online, Qualtrics survey that sampled randomly selected students from a rural university (n = 3,000) and recruited using flyers posted in food pantries on campus. Reported results include demographic characteristics, use of on-campus food pantries, a validated food insecurity questionnaire, food pantry self-stigma, and an adapted measure of self-stigma of seeking help, and affirming or nonaffirm­ing qualitative measures of food pantry stigma. Sentiment and keyword analyses were conducted by two researchers to analyze qualitative data to identify factors that influence food pantry stigma from food pantry users and nonusers. Quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Qual­itative data determined areas of stigma and aligned with the descriptive statistics on self-stigma and help-seeking measures. Among survey participants (n = 594), 35.7% of food-insecure students did not use food pantries. Users (M = 23.12, SD = 9.06) reported higher perceptions of food pantry stigma than nonusers (M = 15.79, SD = 3.85). Of the food pantry nonusers (n = 461), 322 identified the presence of stigma (69.85%). Sixty-six food pantry users (n = 97) identified the presence of stigma (68.04%). The keyword analysis highlighted poten­tial influences of food pantry stigma among all par­ticipants including power hierarchy, financial bur­den, embarrassment, and feeling superfluous. This study highlights influences of stigma and places an emphasis on changing current approaches in cam­pus food pantry implementation and dissemina­tion. Future studies could investigate the barriers and solutions to current messaging and implemen­tation of campus food pantries utilizing implemen­tation science experts and frameworks.","PeriodicalId":505953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2024.133.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food pantry stigma among college students has been documented as an issue that impacts the utili­zation of resources but has not been deeply investi­gated. The objective of this study was to explore sources of food pantry stigma to identify different strategies to encourage food pantry use, which has the potential to positively alter methods on cam­puses. This mixed-methods study was a branched (separate questions and responses from both food pantry users and nonusers), 51-item, online, Qualtrics survey that sampled randomly selected students from a rural university (n = 3,000) and recruited using flyers posted in food pantries on campus. Reported results include demographic characteristics, use of on-campus food pantries, a validated food insecurity questionnaire, food pantry self-stigma, and an adapted measure of self-stigma of seeking help, and affirming or nonaffirm­ing qualitative measures of food pantry stigma. Sentiment and keyword analyses were conducted by two researchers to analyze qualitative data to identify factors that influence food pantry stigma from food pantry users and nonusers. Quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Qual­itative data determined areas of stigma and aligned with the descriptive statistics on self-stigma and help-seeking measures. Among survey participants (n = 594), 35.7% of food-insecure students did not use food pantries. Users (M = 23.12, SD = 9.06) reported higher perceptions of food pantry stigma than nonusers (M = 15.79, SD = 3.85). Of the food pantry nonusers (n = 461), 322 identified the presence of stigma (69.85%). Sixty-six food pantry users (n = 97) identified the presence of stigma (68.04%). The keyword analysis highlighted poten­tial influences of food pantry stigma among all par­ticipants including power hierarchy, financial bur­den, embarrassment, and feeling superfluous. This study highlights influences of stigma and places an emphasis on changing current approaches in cam­pus food pantry implementation and dissemina­tion. Future studies could investigate the barriers and solutions to current messaging and implemen­tation of campus food pantries utilizing implemen­tation science experts and frameworks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对大学生食品储藏室使用者和非使用者的成见进行情感和关键词分析
大学生对食品储藏室的成见已被记录在案,这是一个影响资源利用的问题,但尚未得到深入研究。本研究的目的是探索食品储藏室耻辱感的来源,以确定鼓励使用食品储藏室的不同策略,从而有可能积极改变校园内的使用方法。这项混合方法研究是一项分门别类(食物储藏室使用者和非使用者分别提问和回答)、51 个项目的在线 Qualtrics 调查,从一所农村大学随机抽取学生(n = 3,000),利用校园内食物储藏室张贴的传单进行招募。报告的结果包括人口统计学特征、校内食品储藏室的使用情况、经过验证的食品不安全问卷、食品储藏室自我污名化、求助自我污名化的改编测量方法,以及食品储藏室污名化的肯定或不肯定定性测量方法。两名研究人员对定性数据进行了情感和关键词分析,以确定影响食物储藏室使用者和非使用者对食物储藏室成见的因素。定量数据通过描述性统计进行分析。定性数据确定了成见的领域,并与自我成见和求助措施的描述性统计相一致。在参与调查的学生(n = 594)中,35.7% 的食物无保障学生不使用食物储藏室。与不使用食物储藏室的学生(M = 15.79,SD = 3.85)相比,使用食物储藏室的学生(M = 23.12,SD = 9.06)对食物储藏室耻辱感的认识更高。在食物储藏室非使用者(n = 461)中,有 322 人(69.85%)认为存在耻辱感。66 名食物储藏室使用者(n = 97)认为存在成见(68.04%)。关键词分析强调了食品储藏室成见对所有参与者的潜在影响,包括权力等级、经济负担、尴尬和多余感。本研究强调了成见的影响因素,并着重强调了在校园食品储藏室的实施和推广过程中改变现有方法的重要性。未来的研究可以利用实施科学专家和框架,调查当前校园食品储藏室的信息传递和实施的障碍和解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“What does Ferguson mean for the food justice movement?”: Reading Black visions of food justice in times of social unrest In This Issue: Commentaries from the 2023 Agroecology Summit in the U.S., and open-call papers From market concentration to political corruption [Book review] Challenging agricultural norms and diversifying actors: Building transformative public policy for equitable food systems Barriers and opportunities to agrihood development in growing cities of the Rocky Mountain region: A comparative case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1