The importance of diversity and inclusion within the research supervision relationship: The views of research students and supervisors

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Counselling & Psychotherapy Research Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1002/capr.12776
Sofie Bager-Charleson, Alistair McBeath, Divine Charura, Clare Symons
{"title":"The importance of diversity and inclusion within the research supervision relationship: The views of research students and supervisors","authors":"Sofie Bager-Charleson,&nbsp;Alistair McBeath,&nbsp;Divine Charura,&nbsp;Clare Symons","doi":"10.1002/capr.12776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Research supervisors are uniquely positioned to recognise student abilities and needs. This mixed methods study explores how research supervision can support counselling, psychotherapy and counselling psychology doctoral students in their development of new knowledge, with diversity-related opportunities and challenges in mind.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Guided by ‘dialectical pragmatism’, we used a semi-qualitative online survey, Reflective Online Practitioner Survey (ROPS; McBeath, 2020), with closed and open questions disseminated across learning institutes in the UK, Europe and North America.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The survey received 105 responses, with 45 coming from research supervisors and 60 from research students. Only a minority considered their own research supervision team to be diverse, and two-thirds of respondents did not see matters relating to diversity and inclusion receiving sufficient emphasis in published research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Both our quantitative and qualitative data addressed unequal representations in terms of gender and sexuality, ethnicity and heritage, (dis-)ability and social class—several referring to a ‘history of domination by white, cis, non-disabled male perspectives’. Many described ‘diversity being left out of research’ with consequences on the capacity to meet clients' need in clinical practice. As one said: ‘we need to decolonise the training material by critically analysing and situating knowledge and calling out missing voices’. Another stated: ‘If the research we conduct and draw on as practitioners cannot actively reckon with oppression within…we risk furthering the violence that marginalised clients, practitioners, and researchers face’. Support and training of supervisors to address diversity and power in research from the start of supervision were argued as essential, with both the supervisory relationship and innovative epistemological angles to knowledge and ‘reality’ in the field of mental health in mind.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Research supervisors are uniquely positioned to recognise student abilities and needs. This mixed methods study explores how research supervision can support counselling, psychotherapy and counselling psychology doctoral students in their development of new knowledge, with diversity-related opportunities and challenges in mind.

Methods

Guided by ‘dialectical pragmatism’, we used a semi-qualitative online survey, Reflective Online Practitioner Survey (ROPS; McBeath, 2020), with closed and open questions disseminated across learning institutes in the UK, Europe and North America.

Results

The survey received 105 responses, with 45 coming from research supervisors and 60 from research students. Only a minority considered their own research supervision team to be diverse, and two-thirds of respondents did not see matters relating to diversity and inclusion receiving sufficient emphasis in published research.

Conclusions

Both our quantitative and qualitative data addressed unequal representations in terms of gender and sexuality, ethnicity and heritage, (dis-)ability and social class—several referring to a ‘history of domination by white, cis, non-disabled male perspectives’. Many described ‘diversity being left out of research’ with consequences on the capacity to meet clients' need in clinical practice. As one said: ‘we need to decolonise the training material by critically analysing and situating knowledge and calling out missing voices’. Another stated: ‘If the research we conduct and draw on as practitioners cannot actively reckon with oppression within…we risk furthering the violence that marginalised clients, practitioners, and researchers face’. Support and training of supervisors to address diversity and power in research from the start of supervision were argued as essential, with both the supervisory relationship and innovative epistemological angles to knowledge and ‘reality’ in the field of mental health in mind.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究督导关系中多样性和包容性的重要性:研究生和导师的观点
研究督导在认识学生的能力和需求方面具有独特的优势。在 "辩证实用主义 "的指导下,我们使用了半定性在线调查 "反思性在线从业者调查"(ROPS;McBeath,2020 年),在英国、欧洲和北美的学习机构中发布了封闭式和开放式问题。调查共收到 105 份回复,其中 45 份来自研究督导,60 份来自研究学生。只有少数人认为他们自己的研究督导团队是多元化的,三分之二的受访者认为与多元化和包容性有关的问题在已发表的研究中没有得到足够重视。我们的定量和定性数据都涉及到性别和性取向、种族和遗产、(残疾)能力和社会阶层方面的不平等表述--其中许多人提到了 "白人、同性、非残疾男性的主导历史"。许多人说 "多样性被排除在研究之外",从而影响了临床实践中满足客户需求的能力。正如一位学员所说:"我们需要对知识进行批判性分析和定位,唤醒缺失的声音,从而使培训材料去殖民化"。另一位学员说如果我们作为从业人员所开展和借鉴的研究不能积极反思内部的压迫......我们就有可能进一步加剧被边缘化的客户、从业人员和研究人员所面临的暴力"。有人认为,从督导一开始就支持和培训督导人员解决研究中的多样性和权力问题是至关重要的,同时要考虑到督导关系以及精神健康领域知识和 "现实 "的创新认识论角度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Collaboration with clients to create journal notes: A mixed methods evaluation of a pilot intervention study in a municipality mental health services team Reflections from LGBTQIA+ individuals of their past experiences of psychotherapy and counselling and the use of creative therapy—A qualitative study Effects of a muscle relaxation exercise programme on test anxiety and sleep quality among fourth-year nursing students before comprehensive examination in Palestine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1