Subgroups of mild cognitive impairment based on cognitive function among Chinese older adults

Yi Zhou, Rong Lin, Yuan-Jiao Yan, Yu-ting Luo, Zhen-zhen Cai, KaiYan Zhu, Chen-shan Huang, Yun-xian Wang, Yi-fei Xu, Yueqi Chao, Chu-fan Zhang, Hong Li, Ming-feng Chen
{"title":"Subgroups of mild cognitive impairment based on cognitive function among Chinese older adults","authors":"Yi Zhou, Rong Lin, Yuan-Jiao Yan, Yu-ting Luo, Zhen-zhen Cai, KaiYan Zhu, Chen-shan Huang, Yun-xian Wang, Yi-fei Xu, Yueqi Chao, Chu-fan Zhang, Hong Li, Ming-feng Chen","doi":"10.1097/nr9.0000000000000057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Due to the heterogeneity of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the key points for non-pharmaceutical therapies cannot be determined. Examining impairment characteristics among different MCI subgroups would therefore be beneficial to the development of non-pharmaceutical therapies.\n \n \n \n To characterize the subgroups of older Chinese with MCI, and examine factors associated with the membership of distinct subgroups.\n \n \n \n This cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2018 and June 2022 in Fujian, East China, with 1017 older adults with MCI deemed eligible. Exclusion criteria included any diagnosis of other neurological or psychiatric conditions that could affect cognition. Participants underwent a neuropsychological test that assessed memory, language, attention, and executive function(s), and completed a questionnaire collecting their socioeconomic and clinical variables. Neuropsychological test scores were transformed to z-scores, which were then examined using latent class analysis. Associations between socioeconomic and clinical variables, and MCI subgroups were assessed using multinomial logistic regression analysis.\n \n \n \n Three MCI subgroups were identified: G1 “Minimally impairment” (56.64%), G2 “Moderate impairment” (36.28%) and G3 “Worst impairment” (7.08%). Age, place of residence, marriage status, living status, and participation in intellectual activities differed significantly across the three MCI subgroups (P<0.05). Compared with the Minimally impairment group, participants with Worst impairment were less likely to participate in intellectual activity and more likely to live in a nursing home.\n \n \n \n Cognitive function is a suitable foundation for establishing classifications among individuals with MCI. Non-pharmalogical therapies may target older adults at higher risk of moderate or worst impairment.\n","PeriodicalId":73407,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary nursing research","volume":"34 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary nursing research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/nr9.0000000000000057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the heterogeneity of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the key points for non-pharmaceutical therapies cannot be determined. Examining impairment characteristics among different MCI subgroups would therefore be beneficial to the development of non-pharmaceutical therapies. To characterize the subgroups of older Chinese with MCI, and examine factors associated with the membership of distinct subgroups. This cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2018 and June 2022 in Fujian, East China, with 1017 older adults with MCI deemed eligible. Exclusion criteria included any diagnosis of other neurological or psychiatric conditions that could affect cognition. Participants underwent a neuropsychological test that assessed memory, language, attention, and executive function(s), and completed a questionnaire collecting their socioeconomic and clinical variables. Neuropsychological test scores were transformed to z-scores, which were then examined using latent class analysis. Associations between socioeconomic and clinical variables, and MCI subgroups were assessed using multinomial logistic regression analysis. Three MCI subgroups were identified: G1 “Minimally impairment” (56.64%), G2 “Moderate impairment” (36.28%) and G3 “Worst impairment” (7.08%). Age, place of residence, marriage status, living status, and participation in intellectual activities differed significantly across the three MCI subgroups (P<0.05). Compared with the Minimally impairment group, participants with Worst impairment were less likely to participate in intellectual activity and more likely to live in a nursing home. Cognitive function is a suitable foundation for establishing classifications among individuals with MCI. Non-pharmalogical therapies may target older adults at higher risk of moderate or worst impairment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于中国老年人认知功能的轻度认知障碍亚群
由于轻度认知障碍(MCI)具有异质性,因此无法确定非药物疗法的关键点。因此,研究不同 MCI 亚群的损伤特征将有利于非药物疗法的开发。 本研究旨在描述中国老年 MCI 患者的亚群特征,并研究与不同亚群成员相关的因素。 这项横断面研究于2018年10月至2022年6月期间在中国东部的福建省进行,1017名患有MCI的老年人被认为符合条件。排除标准包括任何可能影响认知的其他神经或精神疾病的诊断。参与者接受了一项神经心理学测试,以评估记忆、语言、注意力和执行功能,并填写了一份收集其社会经济和临床变量的问卷。神经心理学测试分数被转换成 z 分数,然后使用潜类分析对其进行研究。社会经济和临床变量与 MCI 亚组之间的关联采用多项式逻辑回归分析法进行评估。 最终确定了三个 MCI 亚组:G1为 "轻度损伤"(56.64%),G2为 "中度损伤"(36.28%),G3为 "最严重损伤"(7.08%)。三个 MCI 亚组的年龄、居住地、婚姻状况、生活状况和智力活动参与情况均有显著差异(P<0.05)。与轻度损伤组相比,患有严重损伤的参与者参与智力活动的可能性较低,且更有可能住在疗养院。 认知功能是对 MCI 患者进行分类的合适基础。非药物疗法可针对中度或最严重损伤风险较高的老年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interdisciplinary collaboration for chronic illness prevention and management through digital health interventions. Association between mitochondrial DNA copy number and neurodevelopmental outcomes among black and white preterm infants up to two years of age. Nurse-led self-management support to improve symptom management and self-reported outcomes in people with irritable bowel syndrome. Research of assisted housing design for the bedridden elderly and their family caregivers Digital twin prevalence in the medical caring fields: a bibliomatrics study and visualization analysis via CiteSpace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1