Comparative Life Cycle Assessment on fuel types for a Formula 1 engine in Belgian Grand Prix

Abstract

Formula 1 racing, known for its speed and innovation, faces an increasingly urgent need to address environmental concerns. This study investigates the environmental impacts of various fuel types used in Formula 1, aiming to bridge a critical gap in the automotive industry's perception of sustainability. With sustainability at the forefront, we conducted a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of different fuel types, including Gasoline, E5, E10, and E85, specifically analyzing their effects during the Belgian Grand Prix race. Through a thorough literature review and careful scoping, we sought to provide valuable insights into the environmental performance of these fuels in the context of high-performance racing. Our findings reveal a stark contrast between marketed sustainability claims and actual environmental impacts. Contrary to expectations, our analysis demonstrates that E85, often advertised as a sustainable alternative, exhibits the highest emissions across various environmental indicators. Specifically, E85 showed the highest impacts on water consumption, fine particulate matter, ozone formation, and human health. These results carry profound implications for the automotive industry, highlighting the importance of informed decision-making in fuel selection within the racing industry. By prompting further discussions on sustainable practices in motorsports, our study urges stakeholders to reevaluate fuel choices and embrace environmentally responsible alternatives.