Development of a carbon emission based rating model for buildings

IF 5.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Cleaner Engineering and Technology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clet.2024.100764
B.H.J. Pushpakumara, J.A.S.P. Jayasinghe
{"title":"Development of a carbon emission based rating model for buildings","authors":"B.H.J. Pushpakumara,&nbsp;J.A.S.P. Jayasinghe","doi":"10.1016/j.clet.2024.100764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Strategies, plans, and techniques that a building follows from cradle to grave to reduce carbon emission and their evaluation processes are highly recommended by green building concepts. The existing methods do not compressively cover all the parameters and their interconnections. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the effectiveness of parameters that dominate the carbon emission of the building sector and to develop a priority weight-based rating model to evaluate the carbon emission of buildings. The rating model was developed using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) which is ideal for multi-criteria decision-making. The entire life cycle of a building was divided into five stages; material production, material transportation, construction, operation, and demolition, and each stage was divided into several sub-parameters. The relative significance of each parameter and each stage was compared and developed priority weight-based equations. The analysis of carbon emissions reveals the following distribution: Material Production (MP) contributed approximately 27%, Material Transportation (MT) accounted for 3%, the Construction Stage (CS) represented 10%, the Operation Stage (OS) dominated with 55%, while the Demolition Stage (DS) contributed 5%. The developed rating model was applied to ten building structures including small-scale, medium scale and large-scale buildings. The developed rating model would be provided a numerical framework-based solution for the owners and construction parties to identify low carbon emissions techniques.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34618,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100764"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790824000442/pdfft?md5=ae9c07aa5b92ab1d93d7d11a9a294f00&pid=1-s2.0-S2666790824000442-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790824000442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Strategies, plans, and techniques that a building follows from cradle to grave to reduce carbon emission and their evaluation processes are highly recommended by green building concepts. The existing methods do not compressively cover all the parameters and their interconnections. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the effectiveness of parameters that dominate the carbon emission of the building sector and to develop a priority weight-based rating model to evaluate the carbon emission of buildings. The rating model was developed using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) which is ideal for multi-criteria decision-making. The entire life cycle of a building was divided into five stages; material production, material transportation, construction, operation, and demolition, and each stage was divided into several sub-parameters. The relative significance of each parameter and each stage was compared and developed priority weight-based equations. The analysis of carbon emissions reveals the following distribution: Material Production (MP) contributed approximately 27%, Material Transportation (MT) accounted for 3%, the Construction Stage (CS) represented 10%, the Operation Stage (OS) dominated with 55%, while the Demolition Stage (DS) contributed 5%. The developed rating model was applied to ten building structures including small-scale, medium scale and large-scale buildings. The developed rating model would be provided a numerical framework-based solution for the owners and construction parties to identify low carbon emissions techniques.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发基于碳排放的建筑物评级模型
绿色建筑理念强烈推荐建筑从摇篮到坟墓所遵循的减少碳排放的战略、计划和技术及其评估过程。现有的方法无法全面涵盖所有参数及其相互联系。本研究的目标是评估主导建筑部门碳排放的参数的有效性,并开发一个基于优先权重的评级模型来评估建筑的碳排放。该评级模型是利用模糊分析层次法(FAHP)开发的,该方法非常适合多标准决策。建筑的整个生命周期分为五个阶段:材料生产、材料运输、施工、运营和拆除,每个阶段又分为若干子参数。比较了每个参数和每个阶段的相对重要性,并制定了基于权重的优先权方程。碳排放分析显示了以下分布情况:材料生产(MP)约占 27%,材料运输(MT)占 3%,施工阶段(CS)占 10%,运营阶段(OS)占 55%,拆除阶段(DS)占 5%。开发的评级模型适用于十种建筑结构,包括小型、中型和大型建筑。所开发的评级模型将为业主和施工方提供一个基于数字框架的解决方案,以确定低碳排放技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Engineering and Technology
Cleaner Engineering and Technology Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Guidelines for implementing cleaner production strategies in a natural rubber gloves manufacturing industry How does the use of cryptocurrency affect circular economy practices in Iranian manufacturing companies? Optimization of alkali-activated ladle slag-fly ash composites using a Taguchi-TOPSIS hybrid algorithm The effects of joint process parameters of two-step manufacturing processes on the mechanical performance of biocomposites using Taguchi and multiple regression techniques A tiered NARX model for forecasting day-ahead energy production in distributed solar PV systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1