Extreme Value Monte Carlo Tree Search (Extended Abstract)

Masataro Asai, Stephen Wissow
{"title":"Extreme Value Monte Carlo Tree Search (Extended Abstract)","authors":"Masataro Asai, Stephen Wissow","doi":"10.1609/socs.v17i1.31569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) combined with Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) has had limited success in domain-independent classical planning until recently. Previous work (Wissow and Asai 2023) showed that UCB1, designed for bounded rewards, does not perform well when applied to the cost-to-go estimates of classical planning, which are unbounded in R, then improved the performance by using a Gaussian reward MAB instead. We further sharpen our understanding of ideal bandits for planning tasks by resolving three issues: First, Gaussian MABs under-specify the support of cost-to-go estimates as [−∞, ∞]. Second, Full-Bellman backup that backpropagates max/min of samples lacks theoretical justifications. Third, removing dead-ends lacks justifications in Monte-Carlo backup. We use Extreme Value Theory Type 2 to resolve them at once, propose two bandits (UCB1-Uniform/Power), and apply them to MCTS for classical planning. We formally prove their regret bounds and empirically demonstrate their performance in classical planning.","PeriodicalId":425645,"journal":{"name":"Symposium on Combinatorial Search","volume":"56 7","pages":"257-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium on Combinatorial Search","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/socs.v17i1.31569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) combined with Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) has had limited success in domain-independent classical planning until recently. Previous work (Wissow and Asai 2023) showed that UCB1, designed for bounded rewards, does not perform well when applied to the cost-to-go estimates of classical planning, which are unbounded in R, then improved the performance by using a Gaussian reward MAB instead. We further sharpen our understanding of ideal bandits for planning tasks by resolving three issues: First, Gaussian MABs under-specify the support of cost-to-go estimates as [−∞, ∞]. Second, Full-Bellman backup that backpropagates max/min of samples lacks theoretical justifications. Third, removing dead-ends lacks justifications in Monte-Carlo backup. We use Extreme Value Theory Type 2 to resolve them at once, propose two bandits (UCB1-Uniform/Power), and apply them to MCTS for classical planning. We formally prove their regret bounds and empirically demonstrate their performance in classical planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
极值蒙特卡洛树搜索(扩展摘要)
蒙特卡洛树搜索(Monte-Carlo Tree Search,MCTS)与多臂匪帮(Multi-Armed Bandit,MAB)相结合,直到最近才在与领域无关的经典规划中取得了有限的成功。之前的研究(Wissow 和 Asai,2023 年)表明,为有界奖励而设计的 UCB1 在应用于经典规划的成本到目标估算时表现不佳,而经典规划的成本到目标估算在 R 中是无界的。通过解决三个问题,我们进一步加深了对规划任务中理想匪帮的理解:首先,高斯 MAB 未将成本到目标估计的支持指定为 [-∞, ∞]。第二,反向传播最大/最小样本的 Full-Bellman 备份缺乏理论依据。第三,在蒙特卡洛备份中,去除死胡同缺乏理论依据。我们利用极值理论第二类一次性解决了这些问题,提出了两种匪帮(UCB1-Uniform/Power),并将它们应用于经典规划的 MCTS。我们正式证明了它们的后悔界限,并通过实证证明了它们在经典规划中的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A-A*pex: Efficient Anytime Approximate Multi-Objective Search Tunable Suboptimal Heuristic Search Hitting Set Heuristics for Overlapping Landmarks in Satisficing Planning Fools Rush in Where Angels Fear to Tread in Multi-Goal CBS Evaluating Distributional Predictions of Search Time: Put Up or Shut Up Games (Extended Abstract)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1