Deep Learning Approaches for Water Stress Forecasting in Arboriculture Using Time Series of Remote Sensing Images: Comparative Study between ConvLSTM and CNN-LSTM Models

Ismail Bounoua, Youssef Saidi, Reda Yaagoubi, Mourad Bouziani
{"title":"Deep Learning Approaches for Water Stress Forecasting in Arboriculture Using Time Series of Remote Sensing Images: Comparative Study between ConvLSTM and CNN-LSTM Models","authors":"Ismail Bounoua, Youssef Saidi, Reda Yaagoubi, Mourad Bouziani","doi":"10.3390/technologies12060077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Irrigation is crucial for crop cultivation and productivity. However, traditional methods often waste water and energy due to neglecting soil and crop variations, leading to inefficient water distribution and potential crop water stress. The crop water stress index (CWSI) has become a widely accepted index for assessing plant water status. However, it is necessary to forecast the plant water stress to estimate the quantity of water to irrigate. Deep learning (DL) models for water stress forecasting have gained prominence in irrigation management to address these needs. In this paper, we present a comparative study between two deep learning models, ConvLSTM and CNN-LSTM, for water stress forecasting using remote sensing data. While these DL architectures have been previously proposed and studied in various applications, our novelty lies in studying their effectiveness in the field of water stress forecasting using time series of remote sensing images. The proposed methodology involves meticulous preparation of time series data, where we calculate the crop water stress index (CWSI) using Landsat 8 satellite imagery through Google Earth Engine. Subsequently, we implemented and fine-tuned the hyperparameters of the ConvLSTM and CNN-LSTM models. The same processes of model compilation, optimization of hyperparameters, and model training were applied for the two architectures. A citrus farm in Morocco was chosen as a case study. The analysis of the results reveals that the CNN-LSTM model excels over the ConvLSTM model for long sequences (nine images) with an RMSE of 0.119 and 0.123, respectively, while ConvLSTM provides better results for short sequences (three images) than CNN-LSTM with an RMSE of 0.153 and 0.187, respectively.","PeriodicalId":504839,"journal":{"name":"Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12060077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Irrigation is crucial for crop cultivation and productivity. However, traditional methods often waste water and energy due to neglecting soil and crop variations, leading to inefficient water distribution and potential crop water stress. The crop water stress index (CWSI) has become a widely accepted index for assessing plant water status. However, it is necessary to forecast the plant water stress to estimate the quantity of water to irrigate. Deep learning (DL) models for water stress forecasting have gained prominence in irrigation management to address these needs. In this paper, we present a comparative study between two deep learning models, ConvLSTM and CNN-LSTM, for water stress forecasting using remote sensing data. While these DL architectures have been previously proposed and studied in various applications, our novelty lies in studying their effectiveness in the field of water stress forecasting using time series of remote sensing images. The proposed methodology involves meticulous preparation of time series data, where we calculate the crop water stress index (CWSI) using Landsat 8 satellite imagery through Google Earth Engine. Subsequently, we implemented and fine-tuned the hyperparameters of the ConvLSTM and CNN-LSTM models. The same processes of model compilation, optimization of hyperparameters, and model training were applied for the two architectures. A citrus farm in Morocco was chosen as a case study. The analysis of the results reveals that the CNN-LSTM model excels over the ConvLSTM model for long sequences (nine images) with an RMSE of 0.119 and 0.123, respectively, while ConvLSTM provides better results for short sequences (three images) than CNN-LSTM with an RMSE of 0.153 and 0.187, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用遥感图像时间序列进行树木栽培中的水压力预测的深度学习方法:ConvLSTM 与 CNN-LSTM 模型的比较研究
灌溉对作物栽培和生产力至关重要。然而,由于忽视了土壤和作物的变化,传统方法往往会浪费水和能源,导致配水效率低下和潜在的作物水分胁迫。作物水分胁迫指数(CWSI)已成为广泛接受的植物水分状况评估指标。然而,要估算灌溉水量,就必须预测植物的水分胁迫。为满足这些需求,用于水胁迫预测的深度学习(DL)模型在灌溉管理中得到了广泛应用。在本文中,我们比较研究了 ConvLSTM 和 CNN-LSTM 这两种利用遥感数据进行水压力预测的深度学习模型。虽然这些深度学习架构之前已在各种应用中被提出和研究过,但我们的新颖之处在于利用遥感图像的时间序列研究它们在水压力预测领域的有效性。我们提出的方法包括精心准备时间序列数据,通过谷歌地球引擎使用 Landsat 8 卫星图像计算作物水分胁迫指数(CWSI)。随后,我们实施并微调了 ConvLSTM 和 CNN-LSTM 模型的超参数。两种架构的模型编译、超参数优化和模型训练过程相同。案例研究选择了摩洛哥的一个柑橘农场。结果分析表明,CNN-LSTM 模型在长序列(9 幅图像)中的 RMSE 分别为 0.119 和 0.123,优于 ConvLSTM 模型;而 ConvLSTM 在短序列(3 幅图像)中的 RMSE 分别为 0.153 和 0.187,优于 CNN-LSTM 模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oxygen Measurement in Cuprate Superconductors Using the Dissolved Oxygen/Chlorine Method Development and Evaluation of an mHealth App That Promotes Access to 3D Printable Assistive Devices Probabilistic Confusion Matrix: A Novel Method for Machine Learning Algorithm Generalized Performance Analysis Improvement of the ANN-Based Prediction Technology for Extremely Small Biomedical Data Analysis Optimizing Speech Emotion Recognition with Machine Learning Based Advanced Audio Cue Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1