Caractéristiques cliniques associées au diagnostic de schizophrénie à la Clinique Psychiatrique Universitaire de Strasbourg (1929–1931)

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Annales medico-psychologiques Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amp.2024.03.013
Louison Ramuz , Fabrice Berna , Christian Bonah , Anne Danion-Grilliat , Jack R. Foucher , Julie M.E. Clauss-Kobayashi
{"title":"Caractéristiques cliniques associées au diagnostic de schizophrénie à la Clinique Psychiatrique Universitaire de Strasbourg (1929–1931)","authors":"Louison Ramuz ,&nbsp;Fabrice Berna ,&nbsp;Christian Bonah ,&nbsp;Anne Danion-Grilliat ,&nbsp;Jack R. Foucher ,&nbsp;Julie M.E. Clauss-Kobayashi","doi":"10.1016/j.amp.2024.03.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The development of the concept of schizophrenia by Eugen Bleuler at the beginning of the 20th century has been the focus of numerous historical studies. Many of these studies are part of the history of ideas: they examine in particular the relationship between the newly developed concept of schizophrenia and other existing concepts, above all that of dementia praecox founded by Emil Kraepelin. Other studies relate to social history: they analyze the emergence of schizophrenia as gender-related or as a phenomenon influenced by political or economic factors. However, whether they consider schizophrenia as a scientific or as a social object, none of these studies provide a clinical description corresponding to everyday practice in psychiatric institutions at the level of the inpatient population. Studies on the history of ideas are based on clinical descriptions from psychiatric textbooks or scientific articles, and are therefore far from everyday practice. The discrepancy between science-in-the-making and published science has already been widely described. Social history studies are based on clinical descriptions from medical archives, but these only concern the situation of a single patient or a small number of patients. Moreover, they exclusively focus on the social situation of patients and not on everyday medical practice, such as diagnosing patients. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical features associated with the diagnosis of schizophrenia at the Strasbourg University Clinic of Psychiatry at the time of its introduction into clinical practices (1929–1931). We have attempted to identify those that led the psychiatrists of this institution to diagnose schizophrenia in everyday clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>As the diagnosis of schizophrenia was not routinely given until 1928 at the Strasbourg University Clinic of Psychiatry, the study period was delimited from 1929 to 1931. We have stretched the study period to three years in order to avoid a selection bias due to a too short time frame. The study was based on a sample of 150 hospitalizations. This sample was randomly selected from the total of 401 hospitalizations with a diagnosis of schizophrenia identified during the period 1929–1931. The existence of another diagnosis (in addition to schizophrenia) was an exclusion criteria as we considered that this could alter the description of symptoms reported in the patient's medical files. The data were collected from patient's medical files and more specifically from the medical observations they include. We did not take into account other documents from patient's medical files (such as medical letters or medical certificates) because they were either not clinically informative or were too rarely available. Data analysis was mixed, initially qualitative and then quantitative. In the qualitative analysis, a questionnaire was developed from the medical observations of the patient's medical files in order to explore quantitatively the clinical features of the sample's hospitalizations. A thematic analysis method was used involving the construction of themes that correspond to clinical features. The medical observations of the various hospitalizations (excluding the 150 hospitalizations of the sample) were successively thematized until no new themes were identified. The hospitalizations were selected at random after stratification by gender and year. Eighteen hospitalizations were analyzed. Each theme constructed was then used to create a questionnaire item. The questionnaire developed included 130 items grouped into four axes: psychiatric symptoms, physical symptoms, history, age and gender. In the quantitative analysis, the frequency of each item of the questionnaire was established among the sample of 150 hospitalizations taking gender into account. Additional statistical analyses were performed to compare men and women.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The diagnosis of schizophrenia was more frequent in women, in the 20 to 40 year old age group and when some psychiatric symptoms were reported: “verbal auditory hallucinations”, “indifferent affectivity” and “ideas of persecution”. In the analyzed hospitalizations, “Autism” was rarely reported, while “ambivalence” and “disturbed associations” were not. In the majority of analyzed hospitalizations, patients were diagnosed with at least four psychiatric symptoms corresponding to those currently used for the diagnosis of schizophrenia according to DSM 5. Physical symptoms and history were rarely reported. Overall, the clinical presentation of men and women was similar.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In everyday clinical practice at the Strasbourg University Clinic of Psychiatry, the diagnosis of schizophrenia relied on psychiatric symptoms, primarily “verbal auditory hallucinations”, “indifferent affectivity” and “ideas of persecution”. These symptoms had been identified by Eugen Bleuler, but they were not those considered by him to have the best diagnostic value (fundamental symptoms). Our results support a pragmatic approach to the diagnosis of schizophrenia at the Strasbourg University Clinic of Psychiatry. It could be seen as a transcription into practices of Eugen Bleuler's typical clinical description of schizophrenia, shaped by a pre-existing theoretical influence (Emil Kraepelin's typical clinical description of dementia praecox) but also by the context of hospitalization. Indeed, hospitalizations of patients with schizophrenia were motivated above all by symptoms with behavioral consequences, such as hallucinations or delusions, which may have focused the attention of psychiatrists at the expense of fundamental symptoms. While showing a clear over-representation of women in the diagnosis of schizophrenia, they also revealed that men and women were diagnosed with the same symptoms overall. The over-representation of women therefore might result rather from a lower hospitalization rate of men (compared to women presenting with the same symptoms) than from an over-diagnosis of schizophrenia in women.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7992,"journal":{"name":"Annales medico-psychologiques","volume":"182 9","pages":"Pages 791-798"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales medico-psychologiques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003448724001744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The development of the concept of schizophrenia by Eugen Bleuler at the beginning of the 20th century has been the focus of numerous historical studies. Many of these studies are part of the history of ideas: they examine in particular the relationship between the newly developed concept of schizophrenia and other existing concepts, above all that of dementia praecox founded by Emil Kraepelin. Other studies relate to social history: they analyze the emergence of schizophrenia as gender-related or as a phenomenon influenced by political or economic factors. However, whether they consider schizophrenia as a scientific or as a social object, none of these studies provide a clinical description corresponding to everyday practice in psychiatric institutions at the level of the inpatient population. Studies on the history of ideas are based on clinical descriptions from psychiatric textbooks or scientific articles, and are therefore far from everyday practice. The discrepancy between science-in-the-making and published science has already been widely described. Social history studies are based on clinical descriptions from medical archives, but these only concern the situation of a single patient or a small number of patients. Moreover, they exclusively focus on the social situation of patients and not on everyday medical practice, such as diagnosing patients. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical features associated with the diagnosis of schizophrenia at the Strasbourg University Clinic of Psychiatry at the time of its introduction into clinical practices (1929–1931). We have attempted to identify those that led the psychiatrists of this institution to diagnose schizophrenia in everyday clinical practice.

Materials and methods

As the diagnosis of schizophrenia was not routinely given until 1928 at the Strasbourg University Clinic of Psychiatry, the study period was delimited from 1929 to 1931. We have stretched the study period to three years in order to avoid a selection bias due to a too short time frame. The study was based on a sample of 150 hospitalizations. This sample was randomly selected from the total of 401 hospitalizations with a diagnosis of schizophrenia identified during the period 1929–1931. The existence of another diagnosis (in addition to schizophrenia) was an exclusion criteria as we considered that this could alter the description of symptoms reported in the patient's medical files. The data were collected from patient's medical files and more specifically from the medical observations they include. We did not take into account other documents from patient's medical files (such as medical letters or medical certificates) because they were either not clinically informative or were too rarely available. Data analysis was mixed, initially qualitative and then quantitative. In the qualitative analysis, a questionnaire was developed from the medical observations of the patient's medical files in order to explore quantitatively the clinical features of the sample's hospitalizations. A thematic analysis method was used involving the construction of themes that correspond to clinical features. The medical observations of the various hospitalizations (excluding the 150 hospitalizations of the sample) were successively thematized until no new themes were identified. The hospitalizations were selected at random after stratification by gender and year. Eighteen hospitalizations were analyzed. Each theme constructed was then used to create a questionnaire item. The questionnaire developed included 130 items grouped into four axes: psychiatric symptoms, physical symptoms, history, age and gender. In the quantitative analysis, the frequency of each item of the questionnaire was established among the sample of 150 hospitalizations taking gender into account. Additional statistical analyses were performed to compare men and women.

Results

The diagnosis of schizophrenia was more frequent in women, in the 20 to 40 year old age group and when some psychiatric symptoms were reported: “verbal auditory hallucinations”, “indifferent affectivity” and “ideas of persecution”. In the analyzed hospitalizations, “Autism” was rarely reported, while “ambivalence” and “disturbed associations” were not. In the majority of analyzed hospitalizations, patients were diagnosed with at least four psychiatric symptoms corresponding to those currently used for the diagnosis of schizophrenia according to DSM 5. Physical symptoms and history were rarely reported. Overall, the clinical presentation of men and women was similar.

Conclusions

In everyday clinical practice at the Strasbourg University Clinic of Psychiatry, the diagnosis of schizophrenia relied on psychiatric symptoms, primarily “verbal auditory hallucinations”, “indifferent affectivity” and “ideas of persecution”. These symptoms had been identified by Eugen Bleuler, but they were not those considered by him to have the best diagnostic value (fundamental symptoms). Our results support a pragmatic approach to the diagnosis of schizophrenia at the Strasbourg University Clinic of Psychiatry. It could be seen as a transcription into practices of Eugen Bleuler's typical clinical description of schizophrenia, shaped by a pre-existing theoretical influence (Emil Kraepelin's typical clinical description of dementia praecox) but also by the context of hospitalization. Indeed, hospitalizations of patients with schizophrenia were motivated above all by symptoms with behavioral consequences, such as hallucinations or delusions, which may have focused the attention of psychiatrists at the expense of fundamental symptoms. While showing a clear over-representation of women in the diagnosis of schizophrenia, they also revealed that men and women were diagnosed with the same symptoms overall. The over-representation of women therefore might result rather from a lower hospitalization rate of men (compared to women presenting with the same symptoms) than from an over-diagnosis of schizophrenia in women.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯特拉斯堡大学精神病诊所与精神分裂症诊断相关的临床特征(1929-1931 年)
欧根-布勒勒(Eugen Bleuler)已经发现了这些症状,但这些症状并不是他认为最有诊断价值的症状(基本症状)。我们的研究结果支持斯特拉斯堡大学精神病诊所在诊断精神分裂症时所采用的实用方法。这可以看作是欧根-布勒勒(Eugen Bleuler)对精神分裂症的典型临床描述在实践中的转录,不仅受到已有理论(埃米尔-克拉佩林(Emil Kraepelin)对早老性痴呆的典型临床描述)的影响,还受到住院环境的影响。事实上,精神分裂症患者住院的主要原因是幻觉或妄想等具有行为后果的症状,这些症状可能集中了精神科医生的注意力,而忽略了基本症状。虽然在精神分裂症的诊断中,女性的比例明显偏高,但他们也发现,男性和女性被诊断出的症状总体上是相同的。因此,妇女比例过高的原因可能是男子住院率较低(与出现相同症状的妇女相比),而不是妇女被过度诊断为精神分裂症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annales medico-psychologiques
Annales medico-psychologiques 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annales Médico-Psychologiques is a peer-reviewed medical journal covering the field of psychiatry. Articles are published in French or in English. The journal was established in 1843 and is published by Elsevier on behalf of the Société Médico-Psychologique. The journal publishes 10 times a year original articles covering biological, genetic, psychological, forensic and cultural issues relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness, as well as peer reviewed articles that have been presented and discussed during meetings of the Société Médico-Psychologique.To report on the major currents of thought of contemporary psychiatry, and to publish clinical and biological research of international standard, these are the aims of the Annales Médico-Psychologiques.
期刊最新文献
Introduction editorial board Evaluating STC-1 and STC-2 mRNA expressions in Schizophrenia patients with increased oxidative stress Le délire est-il un récit ? Une approche narrative de la psychose Effect of taxifolin on clozapine-induced experimental oxidative and inflammatory heart damage in rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1