PERFORMANCE OF DIA AND FORWARD-LOOKING OPTIMAL PORTFOLIOS OF DOW STOCKS

Geungu Yu
{"title":"PERFORMANCE OF DIA AND FORWARD-LOOKING OPTIMAL PORTFOLIOS OF DOW STOCKS","authors":"Geungu Yu","doi":"10.17261/pressacademia.2024.1891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose- This paper compares the performance of DIA, trailing optimal portfolio and forward-looking optimal portfolio constructed from a pool of DOW stocks, applying a modified contrarian portfolio construction to the forward-looking optimization. The modified contrarian optimization of this study is based on the premise that loser stocks, in the short run, would have reversal performance and become winner stocks in the short-run future. The investigative question is: Do forward-looking optimal portfolios of DOW stocks perform better than trailing optimal portfolios of DOW stocks in the short run after DJIA hit the year's lowest point in 2022?\nMethodology- To answer the investigative question, this study compares the short-run performance of forward-looking optimal portfolios with the performance of trailing optimal portfolios. Elton, Gruber, and Padberg (1987) originally introduced the optimal portfolio technique.\nFindings- The primary focus was on the case related to September 30, 2022, when DJIA hit the lowest level in 2022. To get the trend analysis of the cases of DJIA hitting the lowest level of the year, this study examined two comparable findings, having examined the performance properties of trailing vs. forward-looking optimal portfolios using the same method. One examined the case related to March 23, 2020, and another examined the case related to December 24, 2018. It finds a robust performance of DIA compared to the performance of two forms of optimal portfolios. It also finds that forward-looking optimal portfolios performed better than trailing optimal portfolios regarding the average performance of three cases.\nConclusion- It concludes the potential usefulness of DIA as evidence of the market efficiency of DOW stocks. At the same time, forward-looking optimal portfolios for short-run investment in DOW stocks are a viable alternative to investing in the DIA. \n","PeriodicalId":517141,"journal":{"name":"Pressacademia","volume":"53 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pressacademia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17261/pressacademia.2024.1891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose- This paper compares the performance of DIA, trailing optimal portfolio and forward-looking optimal portfolio constructed from a pool of DOW stocks, applying a modified contrarian portfolio construction to the forward-looking optimization. The modified contrarian optimization of this study is based on the premise that loser stocks, in the short run, would have reversal performance and become winner stocks in the short-run future. The investigative question is: Do forward-looking optimal portfolios of DOW stocks perform better than trailing optimal portfolios of DOW stocks in the short run after DJIA hit the year's lowest point in 2022? Methodology- To answer the investigative question, this study compares the short-run performance of forward-looking optimal portfolios with the performance of trailing optimal portfolios. Elton, Gruber, and Padberg (1987) originally introduced the optimal portfolio technique. Findings- The primary focus was on the case related to September 30, 2022, when DJIA hit the lowest level in 2022. To get the trend analysis of the cases of DJIA hitting the lowest level of the year, this study examined two comparable findings, having examined the performance properties of trailing vs. forward-looking optimal portfolios using the same method. One examined the case related to March 23, 2020, and another examined the case related to December 24, 2018. It finds a robust performance of DIA compared to the performance of two forms of optimal portfolios. It also finds that forward-looking optimal portfolios performed better than trailing optimal portfolios regarding the average performance of three cases. Conclusion- It concludes the potential usefulness of DIA as evidence of the market efficiency of DOW stocks. At the same time, forward-looking optimal portfolios for short-run investment in DOW stocks are a viable alternative to investing in the DIA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DOW股票的DIA和前瞻性最佳投资组合的业绩
目的--本文比较了由 DOW 股票池构建的 DIA、跟踪最优投资组合和前瞻性最优投资组合的表现,并对前瞻性优化应用了修正的逆向投资组合构建。本研究中的修正逆向优化是基于这样一个前提,即短期内亏损股票会有反转表现,并在未来短期内成为赢家股票。研究的问题是在道琼斯工业平均指数于 2022 年创下年内最低点后,道琼斯工业平均指数股票的前瞻性最优投资组合在短期内的表现是否优于道琼斯工业平均指数股票的追踪性最优投资组合? 方法-- 为了回答这个问题,本研究比较了前瞻性最优投资组合和追踪性最优投资组合的短期表现。Elton、Gruber 和 Padberg(1987 年)最初提出了最优投资组合技术。研究结果- 主要关注与 2022 年 9 月 30 日道琼斯工业平均指数达到 2022 年最低水平相关的案例。为了对道琼斯工业平均指数触及当年最低水平的案例进行趋势分析,本研究考察了两个具有可比性的研究结果,即使用相同方法考察了跟踪型最优投资组合与前瞻型最优投资组合的绩效属性。其中一个研究了 2020 年 3 月 23 日的相关情况,另一个研究了 2018 年 12 月 24 日的相关情况。研究发现,与两种形式的最优投资组合相比,DIA 的表现更为稳健。研究还发现,就三种情况的平均表现而言,前瞻性最优投资组合的表现优于追踪性最优投资组合。同时,用于短期投资 DOW 股票的前瞻性最优投资组合是投资 DIA 的可行替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COMPETITION LEVEL ANALYSIS FOR THE FINTECH SECTOR IN TURKIYE COMPARED TO GERMANY THE IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RECOMMENDATIONS ON INDIVIDUAL INVESTOR DECISIONS GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN IMPLICATIONS FOR FOOD INDUSTRY MAIN FACTORS AFFECTING THE FINANCIAL STRUCTURE OF ENTERPRISES EXPLORING THE SUSTAINABLE FUTURE OF E-COMMERCE COMPANIES THROUGH A DIGITAL MARKETING AND LOGISTICS CONTEXT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1