Chronological alterations in de novo malignancies after living-donor liver transplantation: A cohort study of 1781 recipients using annual comparisons of standardized incidence ratios

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1002/jhbp.12002
Tetsuya Tajima, Koichiro Hata, Kosuke Tanaka, Naomi Iyama, Jiro Kusakabe, Shoichi Kageyama, Eri Ogawa, Tatsuya Okamoto, Hironori Haga, Shinji Uemoto, Etsuro Hatano
{"title":"Chronological alterations in de novo malignancies after living-donor liver transplantation: A cohort study of 1781 recipients using annual comparisons of standardized incidence ratios","authors":"Tetsuya Tajima,&nbsp;Koichiro Hata,&nbsp;Kosuke Tanaka,&nbsp;Naomi Iyama,&nbsp;Jiro Kusakabe,&nbsp;Shoichi Kageyama,&nbsp;Eri Ogawa,&nbsp;Tatsuya Okamoto,&nbsp;Hironori Haga,&nbsp;Shinji Uemoto,&nbsp;Etsuro Hatano","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>De novo malignancies (DNMs) are a major adverse event after solid organ transplantation; however, their characteristics and recent trends after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remain unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively reviewed 1781 primary LDLT recipients (1990–2020) and annually calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of DNMs compared to the age-adjusted Japanese general population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After 21 845 person-years follow-up, 153 DNM lesions (8.6%) were identified in 131 patients (7.4%). The incidence was 0.007 person-years. DNMs included 81 post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs), 14 colorectal, 12 lung, and 12 gastric cancers, and so on. Comorbid DNMs significantly worsened recipient survival than those without (<i>p</i> &lt; .001). The 5- and 10-year recipient survival after DNM diagnosis were 65% and 58%, respectively. Notably, SIR<sub>1993–1995</sub>: 8.12 (95% CI: 3.71–15.4, <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and SIR<sub>1996–1998</sub>: 3.11 (1.34–6.12, <i>p</i> = .01) were significantly high, but had decreased time-dependently to SIR<sub>2005–2007</sub>: 1.31 (0.68–2.29, <i>p</i> = .42) and SIR<sub>2008–2010</sub>: 1.34 (0.75–2.20, <i>p</i> = .33), indicating no longer significant difference in DNMs development. Currently, however, SIR<sub>2014–2016</sub>: 2.27 (1.54–3.22, <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and SIR<sub>2017–2019</sub>: 2.07 (1.40–2.96, <i>p</i> &lt; .001) have become significantly higher again, reflecting recent aging of recipients (&gt;50 years) and resultant increases in non-PTLD DNMs. Furthermore, characteristically in LDLT, the fewer the donor-recipient HLA-mismatches, the less the post-transplant DNMs development.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>DNM development after LDLT was significantly higher than in the general population due to higher PTLD incidence (1993-1998), but once became equivalent (2005-2013), then significantly increased again (2014-2019) due to recent recipient aging and resultant increase in solid cancers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhbp.12002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbp.12002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

De novo malignancies (DNMs) are a major adverse event after solid organ transplantation; however, their characteristics and recent trends after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remain unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 1781 primary LDLT recipients (1990–2020) and annually calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of DNMs compared to the age-adjusted Japanese general population.

Results

After 21 845 person-years follow-up, 153 DNM lesions (8.6%) were identified in 131 patients (7.4%). The incidence was 0.007 person-years. DNMs included 81 post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs), 14 colorectal, 12 lung, and 12 gastric cancers, and so on. Comorbid DNMs significantly worsened recipient survival than those without (p < .001). The 5- and 10-year recipient survival after DNM diagnosis were 65% and 58%, respectively. Notably, SIR1993–1995: 8.12 (95% CI: 3.71–15.4, p < .001) and SIR1996–1998: 3.11 (1.34–6.12, p = .01) were significantly high, but had decreased time-dependently to SIR2005–2007: 1.31 (0.68–2.29, p = .42) and SIR2008–2010: 1.34 (0.75–2.20, p = .33), indicating no longer significant difference in DNMs development. Currently, however, SIR2014–2016: 2.27 (1.54–3.22, p < .001) and SIR2017–2019: 2.07 (1.40–2.96, p < .001) have become significantly higher again, reflecting recent aging of recipients (>50 years) and resultant increases in non-PTLD DNMs. Furthermore, characteristically in LDLT, the fewer the donor-recipient HLA-mismatches, the less the post-transplant DNMs development.

Conclusion

DNM development after LDLT was significantly higher than in the general population due to higher PTLD incidence (1993-1998), but once became equivalent (2005-2013), then significantly increased again (2014-2019) due to recent recipient aging and resultant increase in solid cancers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活体肝移植后新发恶性肿瘤的时间变化:使用标准化发病率年度比较法对 1781 名受者进行队列研究。
背景:新发恶性肿瘤(DNMs)是实体器官移植后的主要不良事件;然而,活体肝移植(LDLT)后DNMs的特征和最新趋势仍不清楚:方法:我们回顾性研究了1781例LDLT初治受者(1990-2020年),并与年龄调整后的日本普通人群相比,每年计算DNM的标准化发病率(SIR):经过 21 845 人年的随访,在 131 名患者(7.4%)中发现了 153 个 DNM 病灶(8.6%)。发病率为 0.007 人/年。DNM 包括 81 例移植后淋巴增生性疾病(PTLD)、14 例结直肠癌、12 例肺癌和 12 例胃癌等。与没有并发 DNM 的受者相比,并发 DNM 会明显降低受者的生存率(p 1993-1995: 8.12 (95% CI: 3.71-15.4, p 1996-1998: 3.11 (1.34-6.12, p = .01)):1.31 (0.68-2.29, p = .42) 和 SIR2008-2010:1.34 (0.75-2.20, p = .33),表明 DNM 的发展不再有显著差异。但目前,SIR2014-2016:2.27(1.54-3.22,p 2017-2019:2.07(1.40-2.96,p 50 年),非 PLD DNMs 因此增加。此外,在 LDLT 中,供体与受体 HLA 不匹配的情况越少,移植后出现 DNM 的情况就越少:结论:由于PTLD发病率较高(1993-1998年),LDLT术后DNM的发生率明显高于普通人群,但曾一度持平(2005-2013年),随后由于近期受者老龄化和实体瘤的增加,DNM的发生率再次明显增加(2014-2019年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Evaluation of prognostic efficacy of liver immune status index in predicting postoperative outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: A multi-institutional retrospective study. Endoscopic assessment of minor papilla morphology: Predictors of successful cannulation and procedural pancreatitis risk in minor papilla endotherapy Characteristics and outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for congenital biliary dilatation in children aged <6 years: Comparison between children and adults. Serum trypsin as an early predictor of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1