Impact evaluation of guidelines on antibiotic utilisation & appropriateness in Malaysian public primary care: an interrupted time series analysis.

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-06-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2024.2355666
Audrey Huili Lim, Norazida Ab Rahman, Su Miin Ong, Siti Raidah Mohamad Azman, Fairus Zana Mohd Rathi, Mastura Ismail, Peter Seah Keng Tok, Bee Kiau Ho, Sheamini Sivasampu
{"title":"Impact evaluation of guidelines on antibiotic utilisation & appropriateness in Malaysian public primary care: an interrupted time series analysis.","authors":"Audrey Huili Lim, Norazida Ab Rahman, Su Miin Ong, Siti Raidah Mohamad Azman, Fairus Zana Mohd Rathi, Mastura Ismail, Peter Seah Keng Tok, Bee Kiau Ho, Sheamini Sivasampu","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2355666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Antimicrobial Guidelines (NAG) 2014 and NAG2019 in Malaysia targeted rational and judicious use of antimicrobials. In this study, we assessed the change in antibiotic utilisation and appropriateness due to the guidelines that were implemented from 2011 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interrupted time series analyses on rates of antibiotic appropriateness and utilisation were performed using prescription data from public primary care clinics in Malaysia between January 2011 and December 2019. Rates of antibiotic utilisation, reported as Defined Daily Dose (DDD) per 1000 patients per day, were stratified by antibiotic classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 16,081,492 prescriptions recorded during the study period, 4.98% (<i>n</i> = 800,899) contained antibiotics. NAG2014 resulted in a significant increase in antibiotic utilisation trend by 0.029 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) while NAG2019 had a substantial impact on antibiotic utilisation, decreasing DDD by 1778 and increasing appropriateness by 54.6% (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Variation in the number of antibiotic molecules being prescribed also decreased after NAG2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that the introduction of NAG2019 led to a substantial improvement in antibiotic appropriateness. At the same time, antibiotic utilisation decreased. Further research is needed to ascertain and ensure the sustainability of these changes and to establish targeted improvement strategies focusing on reducing inappropriate and unnecessary prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11155422/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2355666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The National Antimicrobial Guidelines (NAG) 2014 and NAG2019 in Malaysia targeted rational and judicious use of antimicrobials. In this study, we assessed the change in antibiotic utilisation and appropriateness due to the guidelines that were implemented from 2011 to 2019.

Methods: Interrupted time series analyses on rates of antibiotic appropriateness and utilisation were performed using prescription data from public primary care clinics in Malaysia between January 2011 and December 2019. Rates of antibiotic utilisation, reported as Defined Daily Dose (DDD) per 1000 patients per day, were stratified by antibiotic classes.

Results: Of the 16,081,492 prescriptions recorded during the study period, 4.98% (n = 800,899) contained antibiotics. NAG2014 resulted in a significant increase in antibiotic utilisation trend by 0.029 (p < 0.0001) while NAG2019 had a substantial impact on antibiotic utilisation, decreasing DDD by 1778 and increasing appropriateness by 54.6% (p < 0.0001). Variation in the number of antibiotic molecules being prescribed also decreased after NAG2019.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the introduction of NAG2019 led to a substantial improvement in antibiotic appropriateness. At the same time, antibiotic utilisation decreased. Further research is needed to ascertain and ensure the sustainability of these changes and to establish targeted improvement strategies focusing on reducing inappropriate and unnecessary prescribing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚公立初级医疗机构抗生素使用和适宜性指南的影响评估:间断时间序列分析。
背景:马来西亚2014年和2019年国家抗菌药物指南(NAG)旨在合理和明智地使用抗菌药物。在这项研究中,我们评估了从 2011 年到 2019 年实施的指南在抗生素使用率和适宜性方面的变化:利用 2011 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间马来西亚公立初级保健诊所的处方数据,对抗生素合理性和使用率进行了间断时间序列分析。抗生素使用率以每1000名患者每天的定义日剂量(DDD)进行报告,并按抗生素类别进行分层:在研究期间记录的 16,081,492 份处方中,4.98%(n = 800,899 份)含有抗生素。NAG2014 使抗生素的使用趋势显著增加了 0.029(p p 结论:我们的研究结果表明,NAG2014 的引入使抗生素的使用趋势显著增加了 0.029:我们的研究结果表明,NAG2019 的引入大大提高了抗生素的合理性。同时,抗生素使用率也有所下降。需要开展进一步研究,以确定并确保这些变化的可持续性,并制定有针对性的改进策略,重点减少不恰当和不必要的处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association of anxiolytic drugs with Torsade de Pointes: a pharmacovigilance study of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. Factors influencing healthcare providers' behaviours in deprescribing: a cross-sectional study. Good manufacturing practice inspections conducted by Tanzania medicines and medical devices authority: a comparative study of two fiscal years from 2018 to 2020. Unused medicine take-back programmes: a systematic review. Community pharmacy & primary care integration: qualitative study on stakeholders' opinions and interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1