Introduction: Pharmacogenomics implementation in clinical practice is anticipated to improve our understanding of individual variations in drug response and optimise the safety and efficacy of drug therapy. We aimed to assess the knowledge, perceptions, and readiness of physicians, pharmacists, and nurses in Qatar regarding the implementation of clinical pharmacogenomics.
Methods: A mixed-method study with an explanatory sequential design was conducted. Phase I was the quantitative phase which involved sending an online survey to physicians, pharmacists, and nurses. Phase II was the qualitative phase which involved conducting focus group discussions.
Results: A total of 802 responses were collected, with a response rate of 20%. Only 15.4% of participants had previous pharmacogenomics-related training. The median knowledge score for healthcare professionals was 4 out of 10 denoting low level of knowledge. However, compared to other professions, pharmacists had a higher knowledge score (p-value <0.001) and Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) holders scored higher than BSc holders (p-value <0.001). Despite the low level of knowledge, perceptions of healthcare professionals were positive. In addition, the majority believed knowledge of pharmacogenomics is necessary and that counselling patients on pharmacogenomics requires specialised training pharmacogenomic principles in practice. The main themes extracted from the focus group discussions were knowledge, outcome expectations, preparedness, facilitators, barriers, public education, and implementation planning. Regarding readiness, most healthcare professionals reported that they are not currently confident in applying.
Conclusions: Healthcare providers have a low level of knowledge of pharmacogenomics. Despite this, the majority have positive perceptions towards its implementation in practice. Compared to other professionals, pharmacists with a PharmD degree scored higher in the knowledge assessment. Most healthcare providers report low confidence regarding the readiness for the implementation of pharmacogenomics and report a lack of knowledge, specialised training, and clinical guidelines as barriers.
{"title":"Assessment of knowledge, perceptions, and readiness of healthcare professionals towards clinical pharmacogenomics implementation in Qatar: a mixed-method study.","authors":"Shaikha Jabor Alnaimi, Fatima Ajaj, Ahmed Awaisu, Turfa Alhathal, Shaban Mohammed, Moza Alhail","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2429785","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2429785","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pharmacogenomics implementation in clinical practice is anticipated to improve our understanding of individual variations in drug response and optimise the safety and efficacy of drug therapy. We aimed to assess the knowledge, perceptions, and readiness of physicians, pharmacists, and nurses in Qatar regarding the implementation of clinical pharmacogenomics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-method study with an explanatory sequential design was conducted. Phase I was the quantitative phase which involved sending an online survey to physicians, pharmacists, and nurses. Phase II was the qualitative phase which involved conducting focus group discussions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 802 responses were collected, with a response rate of 20%. Only 15.4% of participants had previous pharmacogenomics-related training. The median knowledge score for healthcare professionals was 4 out of 10 denoting low level of knowledge. However, compared to other professions, pharmacists had a higher knowledge score (<i>p</i>-value <0.001) and Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) holders scored higher than BSc holders (<i>p</i>-value <0.001). Despite the low level of knowledge, perceptions of healthcare professionals were positive. In addition, the majority believed knowledge of pharmacogenomics is necessary and that counselling patients on pharmacogenomics requires specialised training pharmacogenomic principles in practice. The main themes extracted from the focus group discussions were knowledge, outcome expectations, preparedness, facilitators, barriers, public education, and implementation planning. Regarding readiness, most healthcare professionals reported that they are not currently confident in applying.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare providers have a low level of knowledge of pharmacogenomics. Despite this, the majority have positive perceptions towards its implementation in practice. Compared to other professionals, pharmacists with a PharmD degree scored higher in the knowledge assessment. Most healthcare providers report low confidence regarding the readiness for the implementation of pharmacogenomics and report a lack of knowledge, specialised training, and clinical guidelines as barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"2429785"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11600515/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142739776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-26eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2430445
Rana Abu-Farha, Lobna Gharaibeh, Karem H Alzoubi, Rawand E Ahmad, Ammena Y Binsaleh, Sireen Abdul Rahim Shilbayeh, Faris El-Dahiyat, Abdulsalam M Halboup
Background: Gabapentin is increasingly recognised for its potential for abuse, raising concerns within healthcare communities. Community pharmacists are on the front lines in identifying and addressing instances of gabapentin abuse, making their insights invaluable. This study aims to assess community pharmacists' experiences and perceptions regarding gabapentin abuse in Jordan.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from April to June 2024 using a questionnaire-based approach. The questionnaire, developed in English, was uploaded to Google Forms and distributed through social networking platforms. It consisted of four sections: demographic information, pharmacists' experiences with gabapentin abusers, strategies to limit access to gabapentin, and perceptions of gabapentin abuse, which were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. A Chi-square test was employed to analyze the association between categorical variables.
Results: The study included 209 pharmacists (median age 29.0 years, IQR 8.0 years). Concerning gabapentin, 72.7% of pharmacists received requests to sell it in the past 6 months. Of these, about 75.7% encountered suspected gabapentin abusers, noting behavioural changes (95.9%), frequent refill requests (90.4%), and inconsistent medical histories (87.8%) as key indicators. Most suspected abusers were male (81.7%) and aged 21-30 years (74.8%).Common reasons cited by suspected abusers for requesting gabapentin included neuropathic pain (93.0%), low back pain (89.6%), and mood instability (73.0%). Pharmacists perceived an increase in gabapentin abuse (74.5%) and expressed a need for additional training (83.3%). Additionally, 83.7% recognised their pivotal role in identifying and addressing gabapentin abuse. Finally, significant associations were found between working in chain pharmacies and receiving gabapentin requests (χ² = 9.159, p = 0.002).
Conclusion: Pharmacists have an important role in detecting gabapentin abuse which necessitates adequate education. Pharmacists have concerns regarding this issue and believe stricter regulations are needed.
{"title":"Assessment of community pharmacists' experiences and perceptions on gabapentin abuse in Jordan: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Rana Abu-Farha, Lobna Gharaibeh, Karem H Alzoubi, Rawand E Ahmad, Ammena Y Binsaleh, Sireen Abdul Rahim Shilbayeh, Faris El-Dahiyat, Abdulsalam M Halboup","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2430445","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2430445","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gabapentin is increasingly recognised for its potential for abuse, raising concerns within healthcare communities. Community pharmacists are on the front lines in identifying and addressing instances of gabapentin abuse, making their insights invaluable. This study aims to assess community pharmacists' experiences and perceptions regarding gabapentin abuse in Jordan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted from April to June 2024 using a questionnaire-based approach. The questionnaire, developed in English, was uploaded to Google Forms and distributed through social networking platforms. It consisted of four sections: demographic information, pharmacists' experiences with gabapentin abusers, strategies to limit access to gabapentin, and perceptions of gabapentin abuse, which were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. A Chi-square test was employed to analyze the association between categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 209 pharmacists (median age 29.0 years, IQR 8.0 years). Concerning gabapentin, 72.7% of pharmacists received requests to sell it in the past 6 months. Of these, about 75.7% encountered suspected gabapentin abusers, noting behavioural changes (95.9%), frequent refill requests (90.4%), and inconsistent medical histories (87.8%) as key indicators. Most suspected abusers were male (81.7%) and aged 21-30 years (74.8%).Common reasons cited by suspected abusers for requesting gabapentin included neuropathic pain (93.0%), low back pain (89.6%), and mood instability (73.0%). Pharmacists perceived an increase in gabapentin abuse (74.5%) and expressed a need for additional training (83.3%). Additionally, 83.7% recognised their pivotal role in identifying and addressing gabapentin abuse. Finally, significant associations were found between working in chain pharmacies and receiving gabapentin requests (<i>χ</i>² = 9.159, <i>p</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacists have an important role in detecting gabapentin abuse which necessitates adequate education. Pharmacists have concerns regarding this issue and believe stricter regulations are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"2430445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11600517/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142739774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-25eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2429000
Adnan Abu Hammour, Khawla Abu Hammour, Hamza Alhamad, Razan Nassar, Faris El-Dahiyat, Majd Sawaqed, Aya Allan, Qusai Manaseer, Mohammad Abu Hammour, Abdulsalam Halboup, Rana Abu Farha
Background: The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT into medical education is expanding, offering benefits such as efficient information synthesis. However, concerns about the accuracy, reliability, and proper use of these tools persist. Understanding medical students' perceptions of ChatGPT is crucial for optimising its use in educational settings.
Objectives: To evaluate how medical students perceive ChatGPT for educational purposes and to assess its perceived advantages and disadvantages.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out using a questionnaire with five main domains to explore Jordanian medical students' perceptions, practices, and concerns regarding the ChatGPT. This study was conducted from May to July, 2023, and the data were collected using the convenience sampling technique through Google Forms shared within medical students' Facebook groups. Descriptive statistics summarised participant demographics, while logistic regression identified factors influencing ChatGPT usage. Variables with a P-value ≤ 0.05 in multiple regression were considered statistically significant.
Results: Nearly two-thirds (N = 136, 61.5%) claimed to have knowledge of AI but not in clinical settings. Most participants (88.5%, N = 216) were aware of ChatGPT, with 86.9% (N = 212) agreeing that 'Medical students can benefit from using ChatGPT.' Additionally, 83.2% (N = 203) felt that 'ChatGPT helps students quickly and easily summarize complex information.' Conversely, 78.3% (N = 191) expressed concerns about ChatGPT's potential inaccuracies, with accuracy and reliability cited as primary concerns. Multiple logistic regression showed that younger students (OR = 0.902, P = 0.025) and those with lower proficiency (OR = 0.487, P = 0.007) used ChatGPT more frequently than others.
Conclusion: Although the use of the ChatGPT could be more beneficial for aiding students in developing medical knowledge, evidence-based academic regulations should guide its use. Future research should be conducted to examine the enablers and barriers to ChatGPT use in medical education.
{"title":"Exploring Jordanian medical students' perceptions and concerns about ChatGPT in medical education: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Adnan Abu Hammour, Khawla Abu Hammour, Hamza Alhamad, Razan Nassar, Faris El-Dahiyat, Majd Sawaqed, Aya Allan, Qusai Manaseer, Mohammad Abu Hammour, Abdulsalam Halboup, Rana Abu Farha","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2429000","DOIUrl":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2429000","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT into medical education is expanding, offering benefits such as efficient information synthesis. However, concerns about the accuracy, reliability, and proper use of these tools persist. Understanding medical students' perceptions of ChatGPT is crucial for optimising its use in educational settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate how medical students perceive ChatGPT for educational purposes and to assess its perceived advantages and disadvantages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was carried out using a questionnaire with five main domains to explore Jordanian medical students' perceptions, practices, and concerns regarding the ChatGPT. This study was conducted from May to July, 2023, and the data were collected using the convenience sampling technique through Google Forms shared within medical students' Facebook groups. Descriptive statistics summarised participant demographics, while logistic regression identified factors influencing ChatGPT usage. Variables with a <i>P</i>-value ≤ 0.05 in multiple regression were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly two-thirds (N = 136, 61.5%) claimed to have knowledge of AI but not in clinical settings. Most participants (88.5%, N = 216) were aware of ChatGPT, with 86.9% (N = 212) agreeing that 'Medical students can benefit from using ChatGPT.' Additionally, 83.2% (N = 203) felt that 'ChatGPT helps students quickly and easily summarize complex information.' Conversely, 78.3% (N = 191) expressed concerns about ChatGPT's potential inaccuracies, with accuracy and reliability cited as primary concerns. Multiple logistic regression showed that younger students (OR = 0.902, <i>P</i> = 0.025) and those with lower proficiency (OR = 0.487, <i>P</i> = 0.007) used ChatGPT more frequently than others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the use of the ChatGPT could be more beneficial for aiding students in developing medical knowledge, evidence-based academic regulations should guide its use. Future research should be conducted to examine the enablers and barriers to ChatGPT use in medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"2429000"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590191/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142729150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-19eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2428992
Muhammad Akhtar Abbas Khan
The Pakistani pharmaceutical industry cannot ignore the contribution of pharmaceutical multinational corporations (MNCs) in terms of innovation and access to advanced treatments. The sale of a pharmaceutical manufacturing plant by an MNC to a Pakistani company has again sparked a debate on why MNCs are closing manufacturing operations in the country. National firms are currently giving MNCs a tough time in Pakistan. Besides competition, MNCs face mergers and acquisitions that hinder the expansion of existing facilities. In the recent past, there has been a noticeable shift in the market shares of multinational corporations (MNCs) and local companies. The market share of national firms has gradually increased, reaching 74.51%, while the market share of MNCs has decreased, falling to 25.49%. These local companies have increasingly partnered with foreign companies through joint ventures, which has had a positive impact on their growth and market share. Nevertheless, the federal government recently deregulated prices for non-essential medicines, so it is expected that MNCs will show their commitment to Pakistan by investing in the country. Investing in new molecules and infrastructure is necessary for MNCs in order to maintain their position in the market. Infrastructure investment is crucial for the smooth operation of pharmaceutical firms. This includes the construction of state-of-the-art manufacturing facilities, the establishment of research and development centres, and the upgrading of technology.
{"title":"Pharmaceutical multinational corporations (MNCs) and their exit from low and middle income countries (LMICs): analysing the causes and consequences.","authors":"Muhammad Akhtar Abbas Khan","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2428992","DOIUrl":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2428992","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Pakistani pharmaceutical industry cannot ignore the contribution of pharmaceutical multinational corporations (MNCs) in terms of innovation and access to advanced treatments. The sale of a pharmaceutical manufacturing plant by an MNC to a Pakistani company has again sparked a debate on why MNCs are closing manufacturing operations in the country. National firms are currently giving MNCs a tough time in Pakistan. Besides competition, MNCs face mergers and acquisitions that hinder the expansion of existing facilities. In the recent past, there has been a noticeable shift in the market shares of multinational corporations (MNCs) and local companies. The market share of national firms has gradually increased, reaching 74.51%, while the market share of MNCs has decreased, falling to 25.49%. These local companies have increasingly partnered with foreign companies through joint ventures, which has had a positive impact on their growth and market share. Nevertheless, the federal government recently deregulated prices for non-essential medicines, so it is expected that MNCs will show their commitment to Pakistan by investing in the country. Investing in new molecules and infrastructure is necessary for MNCs in order to maintain their position in the market. Infrastructure investment is crucial for the smooth operation of pharmaceutical firms. This includes the construction of state-of-the-art manufacturing facilities, the establishment of research and development centres, and the upgrading of technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"2428992"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578402/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142682076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Anemia management in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant challenge for healthcare professionals worldwide. The extensive management of CKD and its complications is directly linked with a substantial treatment burden, which impacts quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to assess the prevalence and management of anemia and to evaluate the treatment burden and its impact on the QoL of CKD and dialysis patients in Pakistan.
Methodology: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in three hospitals. A total of 170 patients were enrolled, with 156 available for follow-up after six months. Their prior consent was obtained. Each participant was interviewed in person and received a data collection form.
Results: At baseline, the prevalence of anemia among CKD (stage 3-5) and dialysis patients was 78.7% and 94.7%, respectively. Patients on dialysis used more erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs), with 38.6% at baseline and 40.8% by month six, compared to non-dialysis CKD patients. Oral iron was used by 6.2% of stage 3, 25% of stage 4, 20% of stage 5 patients, and 6.6% of dialysis patients at baseline. At the six-month follow-up, 42.8% of CKD and 33.8% of dialysis patients achieved the target hemoglobin level. Dialysis patients had a higher treatment burden compared to CKD at baseline (77.4±10.6 vs 59.3±13.3) and at six-month visit (79.3±11.1 vs 59.1±14.5). The multiple regression analysis showed that treatment burden had a significant association with age, disease duration, and comorbidity at baseline. There was a significant negative correlation between overall treatment burden and QoL, indicating that QoL decreases as treatment burden increases.
Conclusion: Anemia was prevalent, and its management was suboptimal in this study. The overall treatment burden score was high in dialysis patients, negatively affecting the QoL.
背景:慢性肾脏病(CKD)中的贫血管理是全球医护人员面临的一项重大挑战。对慢性肾脏病及其并发症的广泛管理与巨大的治疗负担直接相关,而治疗负担会影响生活质量(QoL)。本研究旨在评估贫血的患病率和管理情况,并评估治疗负担及其对巴基斯坦慢性肾脏病患者和透析患者生活质量的影响:在三家医院开展了一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。共有 170 名患者参加了研究,其中 156 名患者在 6 个月后接受了随访。研究事先征得了他们的同意。每位参与者都接受了面谈,并收到了一份数据收集表:基线时,慢性肾脏病(3-5 期)和透析患者的贫血患病率分别为 78.7% 和 94.7%。与非透析的慢性肾脏病患者相比,透析患者使用促红细胞生成素(ESAs)的比例更高,基线时为 38.6%,到第六个月时为 40.8%。基线时使用口服铁剂的 3 期患者占 6.2%,4 期患者占 25%,5 期患者占 20%,透析患者占 6.6%。在 6 个月的随访中,42.8% 的慢性肾病患者和 33.8% 的透析患者达到了目标血红蛋白水平。在基线(77.4±10.6 vs 59.3±13.3)和六个月随访时(79.3±11.1 vs 59.1±14.5),透析患者的治疗负担高于慢性肾病患者。多元回归分析显示,治疗负担与基线时的年龄、病程和合并症有显著关联。总体治疗负担与 QoL 呈显著负相关,表明 QoL 随治疗负担的增加而降低:结论:在本研究中,贫血很普遍,而且治疗效果不佳。透析患者的总体治疗负担得分较高,对其生活质量产生了负面影响。
{"title":"Prevalence and management of anemia and impact of treatment burden on health-related quality of life in chronic kidney disease and dialysis patients.","authors":"Amjad Khan, Sadia Ghulam Hussain, Saima Mushtaq, Sameen Abbas, Yalin Dong, Weiyi Feng, Yu Fang","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2427779","DOIUrl":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2427779","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anemia management in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant challenge for healthcare professionals worldwide. The extensive management of CKD and its complications is directly linked with a substantial treatment burden, which impacts quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to assess the prevalence and management of anemia and to evaluate the treatment burden and its impact on the QoL of CKD and dialysis patients in Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in three hospitals. A total of 170 patients were enrolled, with 156 available for follow-up after six months. Their prior consent was obtained. Each participant was interviewed in person and received a data collection form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the prevalence of anemia among CKD (stage 3-5) and dialysis patients was 78.7% and 94.7%, respectively. Patients on dialysis used more erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs), with 38.6% at baseline and 40.8% by month six, compared to non-dialysis CKD patients. Oral iron was used by 6.2% of stage 3, 25% of stage 4, 20% of stage 5 patients, and 6.6% of dialysis patients at baseline. At the six-month follow-up, 42.8% of CKD and 33.8% of dialysis patients achieved the target hemoglobin level. Dialysis patients had a higher treatment burden compared to CKD at baseline (77.4±10.6 vs 59.3±13.3) and at six-month visit (79.3±11.1 vs 59.1±14.5). The multiple regression analysis showed that treatment burden had a significant association with age, disease duration, and comorbidity at baseline. There was a significant negative correlation between overall treatment burden and QoL, indicating that QoL decreases as treatment burden increases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anemia was prevalent, and its management was suboptimal in this study. The overall treatment burden score was high in dialysis patients, negatively affecting the QoL.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"2427779"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578422/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142682081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Intravenous unfractionated heparin (IVUFH) and low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are first line anticoagulants for the management of acutely unwell patients. The decision to prescribe either IVUFH or an LMWH is complex with minimal direction from clinical guidelines. The aim of this study was to explore individual prescribers' perceptions on prescribing IVUFH or LMWH in patients' acute management.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposively selected senior medical officers who were from specialities including cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery, respiratory, emergency, vascular surgery, nephrology, neurology and general medicine, identified as those that routinely prescribe IVUFH or LMWH. An interview tool with seven questions and four hypothetical case scenarios guided interview discussions. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and inductively coded for thematic analysis.
Results: Twelve doctors participated in interviews between February and October 2022. Mean interview duration was 24 min; data saturation was achieved. Most were senior doctors: one was a registrar and others were staff specialists. Three key themes emerged: (1) rationale for the choice of heparinoid, (2) patient safety considerations and (3) resources required. The themes and subthemes identified the complexity of issues to consider when choosing between IVUFH and LMWH. Multiple factors were considered by participants which were based on previous experiences and institutional capabilities rather than evidence-based medicine.
Conclusion: Future interventions should focus on highlighting LMWH as the preferred heparinoid in most clinical scenarios. The use of IVUFH should be reserved for specific patient cohorts where the benefit of IVUFH outweighs the additional risks.
{"title":"Prescriber perceptions of the safety and efficacy of unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparin in the acute treatment phase: a qualitative study.","authors":"Danielle Green, Catherine Edmunds, Roselyn Rose'Meyer, Indu Singh, H Laetitia Hattingh","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2418367","DOIUrl":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2418367","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravenous unfractionated heparin (IVUFH) and low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are first line anticoagulants for the management of acutely unwell patients. The decision to prescribe either IVUFH or an LMWH is complex with minimal direction from clinical guidelines. The aim of this study was to explore individual prescribers' perceptions on prescribing IVUFH or LMWH in patients' acute management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposively selected senior medical officers who were from specialities including cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery, respiratory, emergency, vascular surgery, nephrology, neurology and general medicine, identified as those that routinely prescribe IVUFH or LMWH. An interview tool with seven questions and four hypothetical case scenarios guided interview discussions. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and inductively coded for thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve doctors participated in interviews between February and October 2022. Mean interview duration was 24 min; data saturation was achieved. Most were senior doctors: one was a registrar and others were staff specialists. Three key themes emerged: (1) rationale for the choice of heparinoid, (2) patient safety considerations and (3) resources required. The themes and subthemes identified the complexity of issues to consider when choosing between IVUFH and LMWH. Multiple factors were considered by participants which were based on previous experiences and institutional capabilities rather than evidence-based medicine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future interventions should focus on highlighting LMWH as the preferred heparinoid in most clinical scenarios. The use of IVUFH should be reserved for specific patient cohorts where the benefit of IVUFH outweighs the additional risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"2418367"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578413/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142682079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-18eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2421258
Anika Ruisch, Ganesh Khatiwada, Anup Bastola, Christian Suharlim, Birna Trap
Background: Nepal implemented a pilot of the Supervision, Performance Assessment, and Recognition Strategy (SPARS) program aimed to increase health workers' ability to manage medicines through on- the-job training and support from a new cadre of Medicines Management Supervisors (MMS). This study aims to assess the implementation costs.
Methods: Data from the SPARS central database and facilities was analysed to assess the total cost of the SPARS pilot including 293 public health facilities from 12 districts of 3 provinces, from May 2022 until July 2023. We estimated the number of health facilities to achieve a successful performance status, defined as a SPARS score ≥ 18.75 out of 25 (75%) and estimated the cost per facility to reach a successful score.
Results: In total, 293 facilities received 838 visits, performed by 48 MMS for an estimated total cost of $226,531. 124 facilities (44.3%) reached a score of 18.75 points after two or more visits. On average, it costs $1827 USD per facility to reach a successful SPARS score.
Conclusion: This study assesses the costs of implementing SPARS in 12 districts in Nepal. These findings can provide insights into further scaling up SPARS in Nepal or in other countries.
{"title":"Costs of the Supervision, Performance Assessment and Recognition Strategy (SPARS) for improving medicines management in Nepal.","authors":"Anika Ruisch, Ganesh Khatiwada, Anup Bastola, Christian Suharlim, Birna Trap","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2421258","DOIUrl":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2421258","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nepal implemented a pilot of the Supervision, Performance Assessment, and Recognition Strategy (SPARS) program aimed to increase health workers' ability to manage medicines through on- the-job training and support from a new cadre of Medicines Management Supervisors (MMS). This study aims to assess the implementation costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the SPARS central database and facilities was analysed to assess the total cost of the SPARS pilot including 293 public health facilities from 12 districts of 3 provinces, from May 2022 until July 2023. We estimated the number of health facilities to achieve a successful performance status, defined as a SPARS score ≥ 18.75 out of 25 (75%) and estimated the cost per facility to reach a successful score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 293 facilities received 838 visits, performed by 48 MMS for an estimated total cost of $226,531. 124 facilities (44.3%) reached a score of 18.75 points after two or more visits. On average, it costs $1827 USD per facility to reach a successful SPARS score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study assesses the costs of implementing SPARS in 12 districts in Nepal. These findings can provide insights into further scaling up SPARS in Nepal or in other countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"2421258"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574956/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142676131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-07eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2421273
Burhani Simai, Daniel Joshua, Salma Ali, Bora Lichanda, Sharifa Ali, Amne Issa, Heber Anandan, Raphael Zozimus Sangeda
Background: Access to medicine is crucial for the effective functioning of healthcare systems. A robust regulatory framework is necessary to ensure the safety, effectiveness, and availability. However, weak regulatory frameworks persist in many low- and middle-income countries, leasing to the circulation of falsified and substandard medicines as well as anti-competitive restrictions on registering poor-quality medicines, which poses a significant public health threat. This study evaluated the evolution of Zanzibar's medicine regulatory system over the past two decades and identified the key factors contributing to its success by elaborating on the Zanzibar Food and Drug Agency, seeking the expertise of regional, continental, and global experts to assess its regulatory capacity and maturity level.
Methods: This study was conducted at the Zanzibar Food and Drug Agency (ZFDA) in Unguja, Zanzibar, using a retrospective cross-sectional review and qualitative approach. It thoroughly reviewed relevant regulatory documents, including Acts, policies, guidelines, and assessment reports. Data were collected using a standardised checklist and analysed to uncover patterns and insights regarding the evolution of Zanzibar's medicine regulatory system.
Results: This study revealed substantial legal provisions, organisational development, strategic planning, and resource allocation improvements. Notable achievements include establishing a structured organisational framework, developing a comprehensive strategic plan, and implementing a Quality Management System (ISO 9001:2015 certified). The ZFDA also addressed human resource limitations by creating job descriptions and a staff scheme of service, enhancing financial resources through revised fee regulations and government support, and improving infrastructure with new office and laboratory facilities.
Conclusion: Zanzibar's medicine regulations have evolved significantly, with marked regulatory capacity and infrastructure improvements. Future efforts should address the remaining challenges and foster collaboration with regional and international bodies to ensure the continued evolution and effectiveness of Zanzibar's medicine regulatory framework.
背景:获得药品对于医疗保健系统的有效运作至关重要。要确保药品的安全性、有效性和可获得性,就必须有一个健全的监管框架。然而,许多中低收入国家的监管框架仍然薄弱,导致假冒伪劣药品的流通以及对劣质药品注册的反竞争限制,对公众健康构成了严重威胁。本研究评估了桑给巴尔药品监管体系在过去二十年中的演变,并通过对桑给巴尔食品药品管理局的详细阐述,确定了其成功的关键因素,同时寻求地区、非洲大陆和全球专家的专业知识,以评估其监管能力和成熟度:本研究在桑给巴尔温古贾的桑给巴尔食品药品管理局(ZFDA)进行,采用了回顾性横向审查和定性方法。它全面审查了相关监管文件,包括法案、政策、指南和评估报告。使用标准化清单收集数据并进行分析,以揭示桑给巴尔医药监管体系演变的模式和启示:这项研究揭示了在法律规定、组织发展、战略规划和资源分配方面的重大改进。显著成就包括建立了结构化的组织框架,制定了全面的战略计划,并实施了质量管理体系(已通过 ISO 9001:2015 认证)。桑给巴尔药品管理局还通过制定职位说明和员工服务计划来解决人力资源限制问题,通过修订收费条例和政府支持来增加财政资源,并通过新建办公和实验室设施来改善基础设施:桑给巴尔的医药法规有了显著发展,监管能力和基础设施得到明显改善。未来的努力应解决剩余的挑战,并促进与地区和国际机构的合作,以确保桑给巴尔医药监管框架的持续发展和有效性。
{"title":"A 20-year evidence-based experience of the evolving medicine regulation in Zanzibar.","authors":"Burhani Simai, Daniel Joshua, Salma Ali, Bora Lichanda, Sharifa Ali, Amne Issa, Heber Anandan, Raphael Zozimus Sangeda","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2421273","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2421273","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to medicine is crucial for the effective functioning of healthcare systems. A robust regulatory framework is necessary to ensure the safety, effectiveness, and availability. However, weak regulatory frameworks persist in many low- and middle-income countries, leasing to the circulation of falsified and substandard medicines as well as anti-competitive restrictions on registering poor-quality medicines, which poses a significant public health threat. This study evaluated the evolution of Zanzibar's medicine regulatory system over the past two decades and identified the key factors contributing to its success by elaborating on the Zanzibar Food and Drug Agency, seeking the expertise of regional, continental, and global experts to assess its regulatory capacity and maturity level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted at the Zanzibar Food and Drug Agency (ZFDA) in Unguja, Zanzibar, using a retrospective cross-sectional review and qualitative approach. It thoroughly reviewed relevant regulatory documents, including Acts, policies, guidelines, and assessment reports. Data were collected using a standardised checklist and analysed to uncover patterns and insights regarding the evolution of Zanzibar's medicine regulatory system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study revealed substantial legal provisions, organisational development, strategic planning, and resource allocation improvements. Notable achievements include establishing a structured organisational framework, developing a comprehensive strategic plan, and implementing a Quality Management System (ISO 9001:2015 certified). The ZFDA also addressed human resource limitations by creating job descriptions and a staff scheme of service, enhancing financial resources through revised fee regulations and government support, and improving infrastructure with new office and laboratory facilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Zanzibar's medicine regulations have evolved significantly, with marked regulatory capacity and infrastructure improvements. Future efforts should address the remaining challenges and foster collaboration with regional and international bodies to ensure the continued evolution and effectiveness of Zanzibar's medicine regulatory framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"2421273"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544740/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142622879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-07eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2421286
Aliki Peletidi, Vasilis Birlirakis, Michael Petrides
{"title":"Strategic infrastructure planning for the evolution of 2030 community pharmacy.","authors":"Aliki Peletidi, Vasilis Birlirakis, Michael Petrides","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2421286","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2421286","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"2421286"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544730/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142622882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-07eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2421271
John C Hayden, Siobhan Byrne, Chloe Cullen, Eadoin Lennon, France Pruteanu, Judith D Strawbridge
Background: Medicine shortages are a global problem. Prior studies have focused on hospitals, and staff views, with less information on community practice. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of medicine shortages in community pharmacies and potential impact on patients.
Method: Four community pharmacies (two urban, two rural) in Ireland recorded details of prescription request shortages per items dispensed. Data were gathered one study day per month from February to April 2023. A prevalence across sites was estimated and trends examined using a Poisson regression.
Results: There were 76 medicine requests defined as shortages out of 3734 prescription item requests, giving a mean shortage prevalence of 2% (95% CI 1.6-2.5%). There was a non-significant, 17%, increase in shortage rate across the study period (p = 0.256). Higher rates were observed in the two urban pharmacies. In total, 61/76 (80%) of shortages were associated with a delay in patient treatment.
Conclusion: Shortages are prevalent in community pharmacy and cause delays in patient treatment and increase in workload of pharmacy staff. Regulatory initiatives to address the issue at a manufacturer level have been proposed, although workforce planning, resourcing and professional role expansion are also required to protect pharmacy staff and patient outcomes.
{"title":"A multi-site repeated prevalence study of medicine shortages in community pharmacies.","authors":"John C Hayden, Siobhan Byrne, Chloe Cullen, Eadoin Lennon, France Pruteanu, Judith D Strawbridge","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2421271","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2421271","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medicine shortages are a global problem. Prior studies have focused on hospitals, and staff views, with less information on community practice. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of medicine shortages in community pharmacies and potential impact on patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Four community pharmacies (two urban, two rural) in Ireland recorded details of prescription request shortages per items dispensed. Data were gathered one study day per month from February to April 2023. A prevalence across sites was estimated and trends examined using a Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 76 medicine requests defined as shortages out of 3734 prescription item requests, giving a mean shortage prevalence of 2% (95% CI 1.6-2.5%). There was a non-significant, 17%, increase in shortage rate across the study period (<i>p</i> = 0.256). Higher rates were observed in the two urban pharmacies. In total, 61/76 (80%) of shortages were associated with a delay in patient treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Shortages are prevalent in community pharmacy and cause delays in patient treatment and increase in workload of pharmacy staff. Regulatory initiatives to address the issue at a manufacturer level have been proposed, although workforce planning, resourcing and professional role expansion are also required to protect pharmacy staff and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"2421271"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544751/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142622881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}