A Chinese Multi-Specialty Delphi Consensus to Optimize RAASi Usage and Hyperkalaemia Management in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Heart Failure

Q2 Medicine Chinese Medical Sciences Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.24920/004327
{"title":"A Chinese Multi-Specialty Delphi Consensus to Optimize RAASi Usage and Hyperkalaemia Management in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Heart Failure","authors":"","doi":"10.24920/004327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Variations are present in common clinical practices regarding best practice in managing hyperkalaemia (HK), there is therefore a need to establish a multi-specialty approach to optimal rennin-angiotension-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) usage and HK management in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) &amp; heart failure (HF). This study aimed to establish a multi-speciality approach to the optimal use of RAASi and the management of HK in patients with CKD and HF.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A steering expert group of cardiology and nephrology experts across China were convened to discuss challenges to HK management through a nominal group technique. The group then created a list of 41 statements for a consensus questionnaire, which was distributed for a further survey in extended panel group of cardiologists and nephrologists across China. Consensus was assessed using a modified Delphi technique, with agreement defined as “strong” (≥75% and &lt;90%) and “very strong” (≥90%). The steering group, data collection, and analysis were aided by an independent facilitator.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 150 responses from 21 provinces across China were recruited in the survey. Respondents were comprised of an even split (<em>n</em>=75, 50%) between cardiologists and nephrologists. All 41 statements achieved the 75% consensus agreement threshold, of which 27 statements attained very strong consensus (≥90% agreement) and 14 attained strong consensus (agreement between 75% and 90%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Based on the agreement levels from respondents, the steering group agreed a set of recommendations intended to improve patient outcomes in the use of RAASi therapy and HK management in China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35615,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Medical Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S100192942400021X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Variations are present in common clinical practices regarding best practice in managing hyperkalaemia (HK), there is therefore a need to establish a multi-specialty approach to optimal rennin-angiotension-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) usage and HK management in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) & heart failure (HF). This study aimed to establish a multi-speciality approach to the optimal use of RAASi and the management of HK in patients with CKD and HF.

Methods

A steering expert group of cardiology and nephrology experts across China were convened to discuss challenges to HK management through a nominal group technique. The group then created a list of 41 statements for a consensus questionnaire, which was distributed for a further survey in extended panel group of cardiologists and nephrologists across China. Consensus was assessed using a modified Delphi technique, with agreement defined as “strong” (≥75% and <90%) and “very strong” (≥90%). The steering group, data collection, and analysis were aided by an independent facilitator.

Results

A total of 150 responses from 21 provinces across China were recruited in the survey. Respondents were comprised of an even split (n=75, 50%) between cardiologists and nephrologists. All 41 statements achieved the 75% consensus agreement threshold, of which 27 statements attained very strong consensus (≥90% agreement) and 14 attained strong consensus (agreement between 75% and 90%).

Conclusion

Based on the agreement levels from respondents, the steering group agreed a set of recommendations intended to improve patient outcomes in the use of RAASi therapy and HK management in China.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国多专科德尔菲共识:优化慢性肾病和心衰患者 RAASi 的使用和高钾血症管理
目的:在处理高钾血症(HK)的最佳实践方面,常见的临床实践存在差异,因此有必要建立一种多专业方法,以优化肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂(RAASi)的使用以及慢性肾脏病(CKD)和心力衰竭(HF)患者的HK管理:由来自中国各地的心脏病学和肾脏病学专家组成的专家指导小组召开会议,通过名义小组技术(NGT)讨论香港管理面临的挑战。然后,专家组编制了一份包含 41 项陈述的共识调查问卷,并将其分发给全国各地的心脏病学家和肾脏病学家组成的扩大小组,以进一步调查。采用改良的德尔菲技术对共识进行评估,将一致定义为 "强"(≥75%)和 "结果":调查共收到来自全国 21 个省份的 150 份回复。受访者中心脏病专家和肾病专家各占一半(75 人,50%)。所有 41 项陈述均达到了 75% 的共识一致阈值,其中 27 项陈述达到了非常强烈的共识(≥ 90% 的一致),14 项陈述达到了强烈的共识(75% 至 90% 的一致)。结论根据受访者的同意程度,指导小组达成了一系列建议,旨在改善中国使用 RAASi 治疗和香港管理的患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1275
期刊最新文献
UBE2C as an Immune-Related Biomarker for Breast Cancer: A Study Based on Multiple Databases Linggui Zhugan Decoction Improves High Glucose-Induced Autophagy in Podocytes Alignment Techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Where do We Stand Today? Vascular Calcification: Where is the Cure? BILL Strategy: Points to Consider During the Performance and Interpretation of Critical Care Echocardiography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1