Time-of-flight MRA of intracranial vessels at 7 T.

IF 3.7 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Experimental Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.1186/s41747-024-00463-z
Mirco Cosottini, Tommaso Calzoni, Guido Andrea Lazzarotti, Alessandro Grigolini, Paolo Bosco, Paolo Cecchi, Michela Tosetti, Laura Biagi, Graziella Donatelli
{"title":"Time-of-flight MRA of intracranial vessels at 7 T.","authors":"Mirco Cosottini, Tommaso Calzoni, Guido Andrea Lazzarotti, Alessandro Grigolini, Paolo Bosco, Paolo Cecchi, Michela Tosetti, Laura Biagi, Graziella Donatelli","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00463-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) is a largely adopted non-invasive technique for assessing cerebrovascular diseases. We aimed to optimize the 7-T TOF-MRA acquisition protocol, confirm that it outperforms conventional 3-T TOF-MRA, and compare 7-T TOF-MRA with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with different vascular pathologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven-tesla TOF-MRA sequences with different spatial resolutions acquired in four healthy subjects were compared with 3-T TOF-MRA for signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios as well as using a qualitative scale for vessel visibility and the quantitative Canny algorithm. Four patients with cerebrovascular disease (primary arteritis of the central nervous system, saccular aneurism, arteriovenous malformation, and dural arteriovenous fistula) underwent optimized 7-T TOF-MRA and DSA as reference. Images were compared visually and using the complex-wavelet structural similarity index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contrast-to-noise ratio was higher at 7 T (4.5 ± 0.8 (mean ± standard deviation)) than at 3 T (2.7 ± 0.9). The mean quality score for all intracranial vessels was higher at 7 T (2.89) than at 3 T (2.28). Angiogram quality demonstrated a better vessel border detection at 7 T than at 3 T (44,166 versus 28,720 pixels). Of 32 parameters used for diagnosing cerebrovascular diseases on DSA, 27 (84%) were detected on 7-T TOF-MRA; the similarity index ranged from 0.52 (dural arteriovenous fistula) to 0.90 (saccular aneurysm).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Seven-tesla TOF-MRA outperformed conventional 3-T TOF-MRA in evaluating intracranial vessels and exhibited an excellent image quality when compared to DSA. Seven-tesla TOF-MRA might improve the non-invasive diagnostic approach to several cerebrovascular diseases.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>An optimized TOF-MRA sequence at 7 T outperforms 3-T TOF-MRA, opening perspectives to its clinical use for noninvasive diagnosis of paradigmatic pathologies of intracranial vessels.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>• An optimized 7-T TOF-MRA protocol was selected for comparison with clinical 3-T TOF-MRA for assessing intracranial vessels. • Seven-tesla TOF-MRA outperformed 3-T TOF-MRA in both quantitative and qualitative evaluation. • Seven-tesla TOF-MRA is comparable to DSA for the diagnosis and characterization of intracranial vascular pathologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":"8 1","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11156832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00463-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) is a largely adopted non-invasive technique for assessing cerebrovascular diseases. We aimed to optimize the 7-T TOF-MRA acquisition protocol, confirm that it outperforms conventional 3-T TOF-MRA, and compare 7-T TOF-MRA with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with different vascular pathologies.

Methods: Seven-tesla TOF-MRA sequences with different spatial resolutions acquired in four healthy subjects were compared with 3-T TOF-MRA for signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios as well as using a qualitative scale for vessel visibility and the quantitative Canny algorithm. Four patients with cerebrovascular disease (primary arteritis of the central nervous system, saccular aneurism, arteriovenous malformation, and dural arteriovenous fistula) underwent optimized 7-T TOF-MRA and DSA as reference. Images were compared visually and using the complex-wavelet structural similarity index.

Results: Contrast-to-noise ratio was higher at 7 T (4.5 ± 0.8 (mean ± standard deviation)) than at 3 T (2.7 ± 0.9). The mean quality score for all intracranial vessels was higher at 7 T (2.89) than at 3 T (2.28). Angiogram quality demonstrated a better vessel border detection at 7 T than at 3 T (44,166 versus 28,720 pixels). Of 32 parameters used for diagnosing cerebrovascular diseases on DSA, 27 (84%) were detected on 7-T TOF-MRA; the similarity index ranged from 0.52 (dural arteriovenous fistula) to 0.90 (saccular aneurysm).

Conclusions: Seven-tesla TOF-MRA outperformed conventional 3-T TOF-MRA in evaluating intracranial vessels and exhibited an excellent image quality when compared to DSA. Seven-tesla TOF-MRA might improve the non-invasive diagnostic approach to several cerebrovascular diseases.

Relevance statement: An optimized TOF-MRA sequence at 7 T outperforms 3-T TOF-MRA, opening perspectives to its clinical use for noninvasive diagnosis of paradigmatic pathologies of intracranial vessels.

Key points: • An optimized 7-T TOF-MRA protocol was selected for comparison with clinical 3-T TOF-MRA for assessing intracranial vessels. • Seven-tesla TOF-MRA outperformed 3-T TOF-MRA in both quantitative and qualitative evaluation. • Seven-tesla TOF-MRA is comparable to DSA for the diagnosis and characterization of intracranial vascular pathologies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
7 T 下颅内血管的飞行时间 MRA。
背景:三维飞行时间磁共振血管成像(TOF-MRA)是评估脑血管疾病的一种广泛采用的无创技术。我们的目的是优化 7-T TOF-MRA 采集方案,证实它优于传统的 3-T TOF-MRA,并比较 7-T TOF-MRA 与数字减影血管造影术(DSA)在不同血管病变患者中的应用:方法:将四名健康受试者获得的不同空间分辨率的七特斯拉 TOF-MRA 序列与 3-T TOF-MRA 的信噪比和对比度与信噪比进行比较,并使用血管可见度定性标度和 Canny 定量算法进行比较。四名脑血管疾病患者(中枢神经系统原发性动脉炎、囊状动脉瘤、动静脉畸形和硬脑膜动静脉瘘)接受了优化的 7-T TOF-MRA 和 DSA 作为参考。通过视觉和复小波结构相似性指数对图像进行比较:结果:7 T(4.5 ± 0.8(平均值 ± 标准偏差))对比噪比高于 3 T(2.7 ± 0.9)。所有颅内血管的平均质量评分在 7 T(2.89)时高于 3 T(2.28)。血管造影质量显示,7 T 比 3 T(44,166 像素比 28,720 像素)更能检测到血管边界。在 DSA 上用于诊断脑血管疾病的 32 个参数中,有 27 个(84%)在 7 T TOF-MRA 上被检测到;相似指数从 0.52(硬脑膜动静脉瘘)到 0.90(囊状动脉瘤)不等:结论:在评估颅内血管方面,七特斯拉TOF-MRA优于传统的3-T TOF-MRA,与DSA相比,七特斯拉TOF-MRA显示出卓越的图像质量。七特斯拉 TOF-MRA 可能会改善多种脑血管疾病的无创诊断方法:优化的 7 T TOF-MRA 序列优于 3 T TOF-MRA,为临床应用于颅内血管典型病变的无创诊断开辟了前景:- 要点:为评估颅内血管,选择了优化的 7-T TOF-MRA 方案与临床 3-T TOF-MRA 进行比较。- 七特斯拉 TOF-MRA 在定量和定性评估方面均优于 3-T TOF-MRA。- 在诊断和描述颅内血管病变方面,七特斯拉 TOF-MRA 可与 DSA 相媲美。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the physiological effects and safety of transpulmonary chemoembolization with doxorubicin on pulmonary tissue using a human-isolated lung perfusion model. DSA-based perfusion parameters versus TICI score after mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke patients: a congruence analysis. Exploring the value of arterial spin labeling and six diffusion MRI models in differentiating solid benign and malignant renal tumors. Focal liver lesions: multiparametric microvasculature characterization via super-resolution ultrasound imaging. Fully automatic quantification of pulmonary fat attenuation volume by CT: an exploratory pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1