Clusters Based on Within-Treatment Symptom Trajectories as Predictors of Dropout in Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Substance Use Disorder.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Dual Diagnosis Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1080/15504263.2024.2355953
Elizabeth Alpert, Adam Kaplan, David Nelson, David W Oslin, Melissa A Polusny, Erin P Ingram, Shannon M Kehle-Forbes
{"title":"Clusters Based on Within-Treatment Symptom Trajectories as Predictors of Dropout in Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Substance Use Disorder.","authors":"Elizabeth Alpert, Adam Kaplan, David Nelson, David W Oslin, Melissa A Polusny, Erin P Ingram, Shannon M Kehle-Forbes","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2024.2355953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Dropout rates are high in treatments for co-occurring posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorders (SUDs). We examined dropout predictors in PTSD-SUD treatment. <b>Methods:</b> Participants were 183 veterans receiving integrated or phased motivational enhancement therapy and prolonged exposure. Using survival models, we examined demographics and symptom trajectories as dropout predictors. Using latent trajectory analysis, we incorporated clusters based on symptom trajectories to improve dropout prediction. <b>Results:</b> Hispanic ethnicity (integrated arm), Black or African American race (phased arm), and younger age (phased arm) predicted dropout. Clusters based on PTSD and substance use trajectories improved dropout prediction. In integrated treatment, participants with consistently-high use and low-and-improving use had the highest dropout. In phased treatment, participants with the highest and lowest PTSD symptoms had lower dropout; participants with the lowest substance use had higher dropout. <b>Conclusions:</b> Identifying within-treatment symptom trajectories associated with dropout can help clinicians intervene to maximize outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01211106.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2024.2355953","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Dropout rates are high in treatments for co-occurring posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorders (SUDs). We examined dropout predictors in PTSD-SUD treatment. Methods: Participants were 183 veterans receiving integrated or phased motivational enhancement therapy and prolonged exposure. Using survival models, we examined demographics and symptom trajectories as dropout predictors. Using latent trajectory analysis, we incorporated clusters based on symptom trajectories to improve dropout prediction. Results: Hispanic ethnicity (integrated arm), Black or African American race (phased arm), and younger age (phased arm) predicted dropout. Clusters based on PTSD and substance use trajectories improved dropout prediction. In integrated treatment, participants with consistently-high use and low-and-improving use had the highest dropout. In phased treatment, participants with the highest and lowest PTSD symptoms had lower dropout; participants with the lowest substance use had higher dropout. Conclusions: Identifying within-treatment symptom trajectories associated with dropout can help clinicians intervene to maximize outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01211106.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤后应激障碍和药物使用障碍治疗辍学的预测因素--基于治疗内症状轨迹的聚类。
目的:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和药物使用障碍(SUD)并发症治疗的辍学率很高。我们研究了创伤后应激障碍-药物使用障碍治疗中的辍学预测因素。研究方法183 名退伍军人接受了综合或分阶段动机强化疗法和长期暴露疗法。通过生存模型,我们研究了作为辍学预测因素的人口统计学特征和症状轨迹。通过潜在轨迹分析,我们纳入了基于症状轨迹的聚类,以改善辍学预测。研究结果西班牙裔(综合研究组)、黑人或非裔美国人(分阶段研究组)以及年龄较小(分阶段研究组)是辍学的预测因素。基于创伤后应激障碍和药物使用轨迹的分组提高了辍学预测能力。在综合治疗中,持续高使用率和低使用率且使用率正在改善的参与者的辍学率最高。在分阶段治疗中,创伤后应激障碍症状最高和最低的参与者辍学率较低;药物使用最低的参与者辍学率较高。结论识别治疗过程中与辍学相关的症状轨迹可以帮助临床医生进行干预,最大限度地提高治疗效果。ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT01211106。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.
期刊最新文献
The Whys and Wherefores of Reducing Cannabis Use in Early Psychosis: A Qualitative Study of Service Users' Experiences of Quitting and the Support. Reduction of Psychosis Proneness in a Daycare Hospital Program for Patients with Severe Alcohol Use Disorder. Eligibility for Substance Use Clinical Trials Among Emergency Psychiatry Patients: The Impact of Exclusion Criteria. Examining Profiles and Treatment Outcomes in Dual Diagnosis: Comparison of Coordinated Treatment With Mental Health Services Versus Addiction Center Alone. A Real-World Data Analysis. Factors Associated With Increased Substance Use Disorder Care in VA PTSD Specialty Outpatient Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1