Ethics in undergraduate nursing degrees: An international comparative education study.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Nursing Ethics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-07 DOI:10.1177/09697330241247322
Evridiki Papastavrou, Stefania Chiappinotto, Chris Gastmans, Michael Igoumenidis, Catherine McCabe, Riitta Suhonen, Alvisa Palese
{"title":"Ethics in undergraduate nursing degrees: An international comparative education study.","authors":"Evridiki Papastavrou, Stefania Chiappinotto, Chris Gastmans, Michael Igoumenidis, Catherine McCabe, Riitta Suhonen, Alvisa Palese","doi":"10.1177/09697330241247322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ensuring morally competent nurses depends on many factors, such as environmental, social, political, and cultural. However, several inadequacies in nursing education have been documented, and no common framework has been established for how nursing ethics should be taught in undergraduate education.</p><p><strong>Research questions: </strong>What are the different approaches across nursing programmes established in teaching ethics? What are the main similarities and differences across programmes facilitating a common understanding in developing a curriculum capable of preparing a morally competent nurse?</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>International comparative education study in five steps: (1) formulating the initial question; (2) defining the units of comparison; (3) determining the variables of comparison; (4) describing the findings; (5) interpreting the findings. The comparative variables were identified, extracted, and populated in a piloted grid.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Six universities were purposefully selected by the Promoting a Morally Competent Nurse project partners for their nursing education curricula as delivered in 2022-2023.</p><p><strong>Ethical considerations: </strong>No ethical approval was required, given no human participants and public data regarding nursing curricula.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Variability emerged in the terminologies used in naming the courses, the numbers of credits and hours devoted to teaching ethics, when the courses are delivered (since the initial semesters of nursing education or concentrated in the final years), and their main modes of delivery (a single or separate module or integrated across the curriculum). Contents have some similarities, whereas the teaching methods varied and included (or not) explicit connections with clinical practice. Attendance is mandatory in all courses. The assessment methods used varied from knowledge-based to more competence-based approaches involving multidimensional strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This comparative study explored similarities and differences across nursing programmes in six different European countries. The reviewed ethics curricula lack significant clarity, and they offer important areas to consider for future development. Issues emerged regarding terminologies, learning workloads, when to deliver, how to deliver, the main contents, and the teaching and assessment methods that merit further discussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"472-485"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241247322","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ensuring morally competent nurses depends on many factors, such as environmental, social, political, and cultural. However, several inadequacies in nursing education have been documented, and no common framework has been established for how nursing ethics should be taught in undergraduate education.

Research questions: What are the different approaches across nursing programmes established in teaching ethics? What are the main similarities and differences across programmes facilitating a common understanding in developing a curriculum capable of preparing a morally competent nurse?

Research design: International comparative education study in five steps: (1) formulating the initial question; (2) defining the units of comparison; (3) determining the variables of comparison; (4) describing the findings; (5) interpreting the findings. The comparative variables were identified, extracted, and populated in a piloted grid.

Participants: Six universities were purposefully selected by the Promoting a Morally Competent Nurse project partners for their nursing education curricula as delivered in 2022-2023.

Ethical considerations: No ethical approval was required, given no human participants and public data regarding nursing curricula.

Findings: Variability emerged in the terminologies used in naming the courses, the numbers of credits and hours devoted to teaching ethics, when the courses are delivered (since the initial semesters of nursing education or concentrated in the final years), and their main modes of delivery (a single or separate module or integrated across the curriculum). Contents have some similarities, whereas the teaching methods varied and included (or not) explicit connections with clinical practice. Attendance is mandatory in all courses. The assessment methods used varied from knowledge-based to more competence-based approaches involving multidimensional strategies.

Conclusions: This comparative study explored similarities and differences across nursing programmes in six different European countries. The reviewed ethics curricula lack significant clarity, and they offer important areas to consider for future development. Issues emerged regarding terminologies, learning workloads, when to deliver, how to deliver, the main contents, and the teaching and assessment methods that merit further discussion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理本科学位的伦理:国际比较教育研究。
背景:确保护士在道德上胜任工作取决于环境、社会、政治和文化等诸多因素。然而,护理教育中的一些不足之处已被记录在案,对于如何在本科教育中教授护理伦理学,还没有建立一个共同的框架:各护理专业在伦理教学方面有哪些不同的方法?研究设计:国际比较教育研究分为五个步骤:(1) 提出初始问题;(2) 确定比较单位;(3) 确定比较变量;(4) 描述研究结果;(5) 解释研究结果。比较变量被确定、提取并填充到一个试验性网格中:促进道德胜任护士 "项目合作伙伴有目的地选择了六所大学,这些大学将于 2022-2023 年开设护理教育课程:由于没有人类参与者,且有关护理课程的数据是公开的,因此无需获得伦理批准:在课程命名的术语、用于伦理教学的学分和学时数、课程授课时间(从护理教育的最初学期开始还是集中在最后几年)以及主要授课方式(单个或单独模块还是贯穿整个课程)方面出现了差异。内容有一些相似之处,而教学方法则各不相同,包括(或不包括)与临床实践的明确联系。所有课程都要求学生必须参加。所采用的评估方法各不相同,有的以知识为基础,有的则以能力为基础,涉及多维策略:这项比较研究探讨了六个不同欧洲国家护理课程的异同。经审查的伦理课程缺乏明确性,为今后的发展提供了重要的考虑领域。在术语、学习工作量、授课时间、授课方式、主要内容以及教学和评估方法等方面出现的问题值得进一步讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
期刊最新文献
Decision-making process regarding passive euthanasia: Theory of planned behavior framework. Nursing students' attitude toward euthanasia following its legalization in Spain. Coping strategies and interventions to alleviate moral distress among pediatric ICU nurses: A scoping review. Critical care nurses' experiences of ethical challenges in end-of-life care. Ethics in undergraduate nursing degrees: An international comparative education study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1