‘White lies and safety nets’: The perceptions of nurses on the use of early warning systems and the development of higher-order thinking skills

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Australian Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2024.04.007
Deb Massey RN, PhD , Tracy Flenady RN, PhD , Amy-Louise Byrne RN, PhD , Justine Connor RN, MPhil , Danielle Le Lagadec RN, PhD
{"title":"‘White lies and safety nets’: The perceptions of nurses on the use of early warning systems and the development of higher-order thinking skills","authors":"Deb Massey RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Tracy Flenady RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Amy-Louise Byrne RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Justine Connor RN, MPhil ,&nbsp;Danielle Le Lagadec RN, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Algorithmic tools such as early warning systems (EWSs) have been embedded into clinical practice globally to facilitate the early recognition of patient deterioration and to guide the escalation of care. Concerns have been raised that the mandated use of these EWS tools may impact the development of nurses' higher-order thinking. However, the relationship between EWS tools and the development of higher-order thinking is poorly understood.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This paper provides the qualitative results of a larger study that sought to explore the impact of EWS tools on the development of nurses' higher-order thinking. The objective of this component of the study was to ascertain the thoughts and perceptions of nurses on the use of EWSs and how this related to the development of higher-order thinking skills.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A mixed-method, concurrent study design was used to explore the concept of the development of nurses' higher-order thinking in the context of EWS tools. The qualitative responses from a Qualtrics survey were thematically analysed and presented.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Two major themes were uncovered: <em>White Lies</em> and <em>Safety Nets</em>. Our analysis of the data suggested that some nurses amend their documentation practice to accommodate the EWS’s escalation process, uncovering a view that the tool did not account for clinical reasoning. Parallel to this, some nurses found that these systems supported clinical decision-making and helped to build confidence, thus acting as a safety net for their practice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Reliance on EWSs can both hinder and/or support the development of higher-order thinking. Early warning systems are useful tools in ensuring patient safety but should be used in conjunction with nurses' higher-order thinking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":"38 1","pages":"Article 101062"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1036731424000869","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Algorithmic tools such as early warning systems (EWSs) have been embedded into clinical practice globally to facilitate the early recognition of patient deterioration and to guide the escalation of care. Concerns have been raised that the mandated use of these EWS tools may impact the development of nurses' higher-order thinking. However, the relationship between EWS tools and the development of higher-order thinking is poorly understood.

Objectives

This paper provides the qualitative results of a larger study that sought to explore the impact of EWS tools on the development of nurses' higher-order thinking. The objective of this component of the study was to ascertain the thoughts and perceptions of nurses on the use of EWSs and how this related to the development of higher-order thinking skills.

Methods

A mixed-method, concurrent study design was used to explore the concept of the development of nurses' higher-order thinking in the context of EWS tools. The qualitative responses from a Qualtrics survey were thematically analysed and presented.

Findings

Two major themes were uncovered: White Lies and Safety Nets. Our analysis of the data suggested that some nurses amend their documentation practice to accommodate the EWS’s escalation process, uncovering a view that the tool did not account for clinical reasoning. Parallel to this, some nurses found that these systems supported clinical decision-making and helped to build confidence, thus acting as a safety net for their practice.

Conclusion

Reliance on EWSs can both hinder and/or support the development of higher-order thinking. Early warning systems are useful tools in ensuring patient safety but should be used in conjunction with nurses' higher-order thinking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白色谎言和安全网":护士对使用预警系统和发展高阶思维能力的看法。
背景:预警系统(EWS)等算法工具已被纳入全球临床实践,以帮助早期识别患者病情恶化并指导护理升级。有人担心,强制使用这些预警系统工具可能会影响护士高阶思维的发展。然而,人们对 EWS 工具与高阶思维发展之间的关系知之甚少:本文提供了一项大型研究的定性结果,该研究旨在探讨 EWS 工具对护士高阶思维发展的影响。这项研究的目的是确定护士对使用电子病历系统的想法和看法,以及这与发展高阶思维能力的关系:采用混合方法、并行研究设计来探讨在 EWS 工具背景下护士高阶思维发展的概念。对来自 Qualtrics 调查的定性回答进行了主题分析和展示:发现了两大主题:白色谎言和安全网。我们对数据的分析表明,一些护士为了适应 EWS 的升级流程而修改了他们的文件记录做法,从而发现了一种认为该工具不考虑临床推理的观点。与此同时,一些护士发现这些系统支持临床决策,有助于建立信心,从而成为她们实践的安全网:对预警系统的依赖可能会阻碍和/或支持高阶思维的发展。预警系统是确保患者安全的有用工具,但应与护士的高阶思维结合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Wellbeing as perceived and experienced by intensive care unit nurses: An interpretive qualitative analysis Employer-provided wellbeing support for nurses working in intensive care units: A national cross-sectional study Understanding crisis needs among family caregivers of patients in critical care: A qualitative analysis Antidepressant use, but not polypharmacy, is associated with worse outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest in older people “Because I couldn't understand and respond”: A mixed-method study examining the impact of language barriers on patient experiences of intensive care unit outreach team care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1