Multicentre prospective study to establish a risk prediction model on pressure injury in the neonatal intensive and intermediate care units

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Australian Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101204
Felice Curcio RN, PhD , Manuel Vaquero-Abellán MD, PhD , Alfonso Meneses-Monroy RN, PhD , Domingo de-Pedro-Jimenez RN, OHN, PhD , Cesar Ivan Aviles-Gonzalez RN, PhD , Manuel Romero-Saldaña RN, PhD
{"title":"Multicentre prospective study to establish a risk prediction model on pressure injury in the neonatal intensive and intermediate care units","authors":"Felice Curcio RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Manuel Vaquero-Abellán MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alfonso Meneses-Monroy RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Domingo de-Pedro-Jimenez RN, OHN, PhD ,&nbsp;Cesar Ivan Aviles-Gonzalez RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Manuel Romero-Saldaña RN, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The association between pressure injuries (PIs), risk factors, and preventive measures in hospitalised infants has not been extensively studied.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this study was to explore the incidence of PIs in hospitalised infants, the risk factors and preventive measures associated with them and construct a risk prediction model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multicentre, prospective, cohort study was conducted in infants hospitalised in two level III neonatal intensive care units and two neonatal intermediate care units in Italy. Sociodemographic and clinical information, the Italian-Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment Scale (i-NSRAS) scale score, presence of medical devices, risk factors, preventive measures, and PI characteristics were collected and evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. In addition, the decision tree technique was applied to analyse variables that best explained the occurrence of PIs in the neonatal population.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A sample of 209 infants were included. A total of 62 PIs occurred in 40 infants; the cumulative incidence was 19.1%. In intensive care units, the cumulative incidence was 26.4%, whilst in intermediate care units, it was 8.3%. The PIs were categorised as stage I, 38.7%; stage II, 53.2%; and stage III, 8.1%. The most frequent location was the nose, 46.8%. Multivariate analysis identified the following risk factors: i-NSRAS score (relative risk [RR]: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69–0.94; p = 0.007); sedation (RR: 7.35; 95% CI: 1.67–32.40; p = 0.008), local pressure relief devices (RR: 4.41; 95% CI: 1.3 5–14.38; p = 0.014), and fasting (RR: 5.04; 95% CI: 1.37–18.47; p = 0.015). The decision tree detected that an i-NSRAS score ≤17 and the local pressure relief devices were the variables that best explain the appearance of PIs in infants.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The incidence of PIs in infants is high, especially in critically ill ones, and is mainly due to the presence of medical devices. The constructed clinical tree model can easily predict the risk of PI in hospitalised infants and, consequently, apply effective preventive strategies. To assign preventive measures based on the risk assessed according to objective criteria, we suggest the application of predictive models as part of a strategic PI prevention plan.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":"38 3","pages":"Article 101204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1036731425000347","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The association between pressure injuries (PIs), risk factors, and preventive measures in hospitalised infants has not been extensively studied.

Objective

The aim of this study was to explore the incidence of PIs in hospitalised infants, the risk factors and preventive measures associated with them and construct a risk prediction model.

Methods

A multicentre, prospective, cohort study was conducted in infants hospitalised in two level III neonatal intensive care units and two neonatal intermediate care units in Italy. Sociodemographic and clinical information, the Italian-Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment Scale (i-NSRAS) scale score, presence of medical devices, risk factors, preventive measures, and PI characteristics were collected and evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. In addition, the decision tree technique was applied to analyse variables that best explained the occurrence of PIs in the neonatal population.

Results

A sample of 209 infants were included. A total of 62 PIs occurred in 40 infants; the cumulative incidence was 19.1%. In intensive care units, the cumulative incidence was 26.4%, whilst in intermediate care units, it was 8.3%. The PIs were categorised as stage I, 38.7%; stage II, 53.2%; and stage III, 8.1%. The most frequent location was the nose, 46.8%. Multivariate analysis identified the following risk factors: i-NSRAS score (relative risk [RR]: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69–0.94; p = 0.007); sedation (RR: 7.35; 95% CI: 1.67–32.40; p = 0.008), local pressure relief devices (RR: 4.41; 95% CI: 1.3 5–14.38; p = 0.014), and fasting (RR: 5.04; 95% CI: 1.37–18.47; p = 0.015). The decision tree detected that an i-NSRAS score ≤17 and the local pressure relief devices were the variables that best explain the appearance of PIs in infants.

Conclusion

The incidence of PIs in infants is high, especially in critically ill ones, and is mainly due to the presence of medical devices. The constructed clinical tree model can easily predict the risk of PI in hospitalised infants and, consequently, apply effective preventive strategies. To assign preventive measures based on the risk assessed according to objective criteria, we suggest the application of predictive models as part of a strategic PI prevention plan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and variability in use of physical restraints in intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis Effects of prophylactic non-invasive ventilation on weaning: A systematic review with meta-analysis Harnessing machine learning for predicting successful weaning from mechanical ventilation: A systematic review Multicentre prospective study to establish a risk prediction model on pressure injury in the neonatal intensive and intermediate care units Effects of compassion fatigue, structural empowerment, and psychological empowerment on the caring behaviours of intensive care unit nurses in China: A structural equation modelling analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1