Decentralization illusion in Decentralized Finance: Evidence from tokenized voting in MakerDAO polls

IF 6.1 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Financial Stability Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101286
Xiaotong Sun , Charalampos Stasinakis , Georgios Sermpinis
{"title":"Decentralization illusion in Decentralized Finance: Evidence from tokenized voting in MakerDAO polls","authors":"Xiaotong Sun ,&nbsp;Charalampos Stasinakis ,&nbsp;Georgios Sermpinis","doi":"10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) is very popular in Decentralized Finance (DeFi) applications as it provides a decentralized governance solution through blockchain. We analyze the governance characteristics in the Maker protocol, its stablecoin DAI and its governance token Maker (MKR). To achieve that, we establish several measurements of centralized governance. Our empirical analysis investigates the effect of centralized governance over a series of factors related to MKR and DAI, such as financial, network and Twitter sentiment indicators. Our results show that governance centralization influences the Maker protocol and that the distribution of voting power matters. The main implication of this study is that centralized governance in MakerDAO very much exists, while DeFi investors face a trade-off between decentralization and performance of a DeFi protocol. This further contributes to the contemporary debate over whether DeFi can be truly decentralized.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Stability","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 101286"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Stability","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572308924000718","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) is very popular in Decentralized Finance (DeFi) applications as it provides a decentralized governance solution through blockchain. We analyze the governance characteristics in the Maker protocol, its stablecoin DAI and its governance token Maker (MKR). To achieve that, we establish several measurements of centralized governance. Our empirical analysis investigates the effect of centralized governance over a series of factors related to MKR and DAI, such as financial, network and Twitter sentiment indicators. Our results show that governance centralization influences the Maker protocol and that the distribution of voting power matters. The main implication of this study is that centralized governance in MakerDAO very much exists, while DeFi investors face a trade-off between decentralization and performance of a DeFi protocol. This further contributes to the contemporary debate over whether DeFi can be truly decentralized.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
去中心化金融中的去中心化幻觉:MakerDAO 投票中代币化投票的证据
去中心化自治组织(DAO)在去中心化金融(DeFi)应用中非常流行,因为它通过区块链提供了一种去中心化治理解决方案。我们分析了 Maker 协议、其稳定币 DAI 及其治理代币 Maker (MKR) 的治理特征。为此,我们建立了几种中心化治理的衡量标准。我们的实证分析研究了中心化治理对一系列与 MKR 和 DAI 相关因素的影响,如金融、网络和 Twitter 情绪指标。我们的结果表明,治理集中化会影响 Maker 协议,投票权的分配也很重要。这项研究的主要意义在于,MakerDAO 中的中心化治理非常存在,而 DeFi 投资者则面临着 DeFi 协议的去中心化和性能之间的权衡。这进一步推动了当代关于 DeFi 能否真正去中心化的争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Stability provides an international forum for rigorous theoretical and empirical macro and micro economic and financial analysis of the causes, management, resolution and preventions of financial crises, including banking, securities market, payments and currency crises. The primary focus is on applied research that would be useful in affecting public policy with respect to financial stability. Thus, the Journal seeks to promote interaction among researchers, policy-makers and practitioners to identify potential risks to financial stability and develop means for preventing, mitigating or managing these risks both within and across countries.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Banks, freedom, and political connections: New evidence from around the world Political governance and firm performance in China: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment Lending standards and output growth Bank lending to fossil fuel firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1