Machine learning-based atrial fibrillation detection and onset prediction using QT-dynamicity.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS Physiological measurement Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1088/1361-6579/ad55a1
Jean-Marie Grégoire, Cédric Gilon, Nathan Vaneberg, Hugues Bersini, Stéphane Carlier
{"title":"Machine learning-based atrial fibrillation detection and onset prediction using QT-dynamicity.","authors":"Jean-Marie Grégoire, Cédric Gilon, Nathan Vaneberg, Hugues Bersini, Stéphane Carlier","doi":"10.1088/1361-6579/ad55a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. This study examines the value of ventricular repolarization using QT dynamicity for two different types of atrial fibrillation (AF) prediction.<i>Approach</i>. We studied the importance of QT-dynamicity (1) in the detection and (2) the onset prediction (i.e. forecasting) of paroxysmal AF episodes using gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDT), an interpretable machine learning technique. We labeled 176 paroxysmal AF onsets from 88 patients in our unselected Holter recordings database containing paroxysmal AF episodes. Raw ECG signals were delineated using a wavelet-based signal processing technique. A total of 44 ECG features related to interval and wave durations and amplitude were selected and the GBDT model was trained with a Bayesian hyperparameters selection for various windows. The dataset was split into two parts at the patient level, meaning that the recordings from each patient were only present in either the train or test set, but not both. We used 80% on the database for the training and the remaining 20% for the test of the trained model. The model was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation.<i>Main results.</i>The mean age of the patients was 75.9 ± 11.9 (range 50-99), the number of episodes per patient was 2.3 ± 2.2 (range 1-11), and CHA2DS2-VASc score was 2.9 ± 1.7 (range 1-9). For the detection of AF, we obtained an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.99 (CI 95% 0.98-0.99) and an accuracy of 95% using a 30 s window. Features related to RR intervals were the most influential, followed by those on QT intervals. For the AF onset forecast, we obtained an AUROC of 0.739 (0.712-0.766) and an accuracy of 74% using a 120s window. R wave amplitude and QT dynamicity as assessed by Spearman's correlation of the QT-RR slope were the best predictors.<i>Significance</i>. The QT dynamicity can be used to accurately predict the onset of AF episodes. Ventricular repolarization, as assessed by QT dynamicity, adds information that allows for better short time prediction of AF onset, compared to relying only on RR intervals and heart rate variability. Communication between the ventricles and atria is mediated by the autonomic nervous system (ANS). The variations in intraventricular conduction and ventricular repolarization changes resulting from the influence of the ANS play a role in the initiation of AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":20047,"journal":{"name":"Physiological measurement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ad55a1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. This study examines the value of ventricular repolarization using QT dynamicity for two different types of atrial fibrillation (AF) prediction.Approach. We studied the importance of QT-dynamicity (1) in the detection and (2) the onset prediction (i.e. forecasting) of paroxysmal AF episodes using gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDT), an interpretable machine learning technique. We labeled 176 paroxysmal AF onsets from 88 patients in our unselected Holter recordings database containing paroxysmal AF episodes. Raw ECG signals were delineated using a wavelet-based signal processing technique. A total of 44 ECG features related to interval and wave durations and amplitude were selected and the GBDT model was trained with a Bayesian hyperparameters selection for various windows. The dataset was split into two parts at the patient level, meaning that the recordings from each patient were only present in either the train or test set, but not both. We used 80% on the database for the training and the remaining 20% for the test of the trained model. The model was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation.Main results.The mean age of the patients was 75.9 ± 11.9 (range 50-99), the number of episodes per patient was 2.3 ± 2.2 (range 1-11), and CHA2DS2-VASc score was 2.9 ± 1.7 (range 1-9). For the detection of AF, we obtained an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.99 (CI 95% 0.98-0.99) and an accuracy of 95% using a 30 s window. Features related to RR intervals were the most influential, followed by those on QT intervals. For the AF onset forecast, we obtained an AUROC of 0.739 (0.712-0.766) and an accuracy of 74% using a 120s window. R wave amplitude and QT dynamicity as assessed by Spearman's correlation of the QT-RR slope were the best predictors.Significance. The QT dynamicity can be used to accurately predict the onset of AF episodes. Ventricular repolarization, as assessed by QT dynamicity, adds information that allows for better short time prediction of AF onset, compared to relying only on RR intervals and heart rate variability. Communication between the ventricles and atria is mediated by the autonomic nervous system (ANS). The variations in intraventricular conduction and ventricular repolarization changes resulting from the influence of the ANS play a role in the initiation of AF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 QT 动态性进行基于机器学习的心房颤动检测和发病预测。
方法 我们使用梯度增强决策树(GBDT)(一种可解释的机器学习技术)研究了 QT 动态性 1)在阵发性房颤发作的检测和 2)发作预测(即预测)中的重要性。我们在包含阵发性房颤发作的未选择 Holter 记录数据库中标记了 88 名患者的 176 个阵发性房颤发作。使用基于小波的信号处理技术对原始心电信号进行了划分。利用贝叶斯超参数选择法对不同窗口进行了 GBDT 模型训练。对于房颤的检测,我们使用 30 秒窗口期获得的接收者操作曲线下面积 (AUROC) 为 0.99(CI 95% 0.98 - 0.99)。与 RR 间期相关的特征影响最大,其次是与 QT 间期相关的特征。对于房颤发作预测,我们使用 120 秒窗口获得了 0.739(0.712-0.766)的 AUROC。R波振幅和QT动态性(通过QT-RR斜率的斯皮尔曼相关性评估)是最佳预测指标。通过 QT 动态性评估的心室复极化增加了一些信息,与仅依靠 RR 间期和心率变异相比,它能更好地在短时间内预测房颤的发作。心室和心房之间的交流由自主神经系统介导。受自律神经系统的影响,心室内传导的变化和心室复极化的变化在房颤的起始过程中起着一定的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological measurement
Physiological measurement 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
124
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Physiological Measurement publishes papers about the quantitative assessment and visualization of physiological function in clinical research and practice, with an emphasis on the development of new methods of measurement and their validation. Papers are published on topics including: applied physiology in illness and health electrical bioimpedance, optical and acoustic measurement techniques advanced methods of time series and other data analysis biomedical and clinical engineering in-patient and ambulatory monitoring point-of-care technologies novel clinical measurements of cardiovascular, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems. measurements in molecular, cellular and organ physiology and electrophysiology physiological modeling and simulation novel biomedical sensors, instruments, devices and systems measurement standards and guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Sulfur hexafluoride multiple breath washin and washout outcomes in infants are not interchangeable. Assessment of arteriosclerosis based on lognormal fitting. Interhemispheric asynchrony of NREM EEG at the beginning and end of sleep describes evening vigilance performance in patients undergoing diagnostic polysomnography. Fraction of reverse impedance change (FRIC): a quantitative electrical impedance tomography measure of intrapulmonary pendelluft. Corrigendum: Highly comparative time series analysis of oxygen saturation and heart rate to predict respiratory outcomes in extremely preterm infants (2024Physiol. Meas. 45 055025).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1