Division of household labor in urban China: Couples’ education pairing and co-residence with parents

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Research in Social Stratification and Mobility Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1016/j.rssm.2024.100941
Xinyan Cao, Zhenchao Qian
{"title":"Division of household labor in urban China: Couples’ education pairing and co-residence with parents","authors":"Xinyan Cao,&nbsp;Zhenchao Qian","doi":"10.1016/j.rssm.2024.100941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The norm in which wives usually undertake a greater share of household labor than their husbands in China is deeply rooted in the fact that historically, women were of a much lower educational, social, and economic status than men. One significant change in recent decades is that the rapid improvement in women’s educational attainment has increased the share of marriages in which the wife has more education than the husband. Does the division of household labor vary among couples of diverse education pairings? How does living with parents – a common living arrangement in China – weaken or strengthen this traditional norm? We explore these questions using data from the China Family Panel Studies conducted in the 2010s. Focusing on recently married couples with young children, we show that homogamous couples in which both spouses have high school or college education and hypogamous couples in which the wife has the educational advantage have the most equitable division of household labor. Co-residence with parents does not alleviate the gender gap for most couples, but living with paternal parents tends to reduce the housework for lower educated daughters-in-law while living with maternal parents appears to benefit daughters who have one-level education more than their husbands. This study reveals reduced gender inequality in housework among the homogamous and hypogamous couples, but gender division remains strong overall, despite improvement in women’s educational attainment and potential support from paternal or maternal parents through co-residences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47384,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 100941"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562424000544","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The norm in which wives usually undertake a greater share of household labor than their husbands in China is deeply rooted in the fact that historically, women were of a much lower educational, social, and economic status than men. One significant change in recent decades is that the rapid improvement in women’s educational attainment has increased the share of marriages in which the wife has more education than the husband. Does the division of household labor vary among couples of diverse education pairings? How does living with parents – a common living arrangement in China – weaken or strengthen this traditional norm? We explore these questions using data from the China Family Panel Studies conducted in the 2010s. Focusing on recently married couples with young children, we show that homogamous couples in which both spouses have high school or college education and hypogamous couples in which the wife has the educational advantage have the most equitable division of household labor. Co-residence with parents does not alleviate the gender gap for most couples, but living with paternal parents tends to reduce the housework for lower educated daughters-in-law while living with maternal parents appears to benefit daughters who have one-level education more than their husbands. This study reveals reduced gender inequality in housework among the homogamous and hypogamous couples, but gender division remains strong overall, despite improvement in women’s educational attainment and potential support from paternal or maternal parents through co-residences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国城市的家庭分工:夫妻教育配对和与父母同住
在中国,妻子通常比丈夫承担更多的家务劳动,这与历史上女性的教育、社会和经济地位远低于男性这一事实有着深刻的联系。近几十年来的一个重大变化是,女性受教育程度的迅速提高增加了妻子受教育程度高于丈夫的婚姻比例。不同学历的夫妻在家务分工上是否存在差异?与父母同住--在中国是一种常见的生活安排--如何削弱或加强这一传统规范?我们利用 2010 年代进行的中国家庭面板研究的数据来探讨这些问题。我们以近期结婚并育有年幼子女的夫妇为研究对象,结果表明,夫妻双方均受过高中或大学教育的同居夫妇和妻子在教育方面具有优势的非同居夫妇在家庭劳动分工方面最为公平。与父母同住并不能缓解大多数夫妻的性别差距,但与父亲的父母同住往往会减少教育程度较低的儿媳的家务劳动,而与母亲的父母同住似乎会使接受过一级教育的女儿比丈夫受益更多。这项研究表明,在同居和非同居夫妻中,家务劳动中的性别不平等有所减少,但尽管妇女的受教育程度有所提高,而且通过共同居住,父方或母方父母可能会提供支持,但总体而言,性别分化仍然很严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The study of social inequality is and has been one of the central preoccupations of social scientists. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility is dedicated to publishing the highest, most innovative research on issues of social inequality from a broad diversity of theoretical and methodological perspectives. The journal is also dedicated to cutting edge summaries of prior research and fruitful exchanges that will stimulate future research on issues of social inequality. The study of social inequality is and has been one of the central preoccupations of social scientists.
期刊最新文献
The distribution of privately held business assets in the United States The U-turn in educational inequality. Why a multidimensional approach matters for measuring social inequalities in tertiary educational attainment Intergenerational poverty persistence in Europe – Is there a ‘Great Gatsby Curve’ for poverty? Beauty pays, but not under all circumstances: Evidence on gendered hiring discrimination from a novel experimental treatment using deepfakes Earnings mobility across three generations of natives in Finland: A comparison of Finnish and Swedish speakers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1