Think different, behave alike? Situations boost or compromise the correspondence between mindset and pedagogy for teachers in upper-secondary education

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101573
Junfeng Zhang, Mengmeng Cai, Danyang Li, Linhai Lv
{"title":"Think different, behave alike? Situations boost or compromise the correspondence between mindset and pedagogy for teachers in upper-secondary education","authors":"Junfeng Zhang,&nbsp;Mengmeng Cai,&nbsp;Danyang Li,&nbsp;Linhai Lv","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Consisting of three logically aligned sub-studies, the current research explored the features and mechanisms involved in aligning mindsets and pedagogies among teachers in upper-secondary education. In Study 1, 114 teachers participated in a two-round questionnaire survey investigating the descriptive characteristics of mindset and pedagogy. Two groups of teachers (<em>N</em> = 12) were semi-structure-interviewed in Study 2 to explore how these features were reflected in their teaching. Study 3 (<em>N</em> = 46) comprised focus-group interviews identifying the underlying mechanism determining which and how situational factors moderate the correspondence between mindset and pedagogy. Results indicated that teachers in upper-secondary education endorsed mixed pedagogies despite their mindsets. The mixing style was characterized by both process-focused and trait-focused pedagogical thinking, and both mastery-oriented and performance-oriented pedagogical practices, with variable persistence and differential instructions. Situations related to cultural orientation, educational system, social atmosphere and individual experiences moderated the alignment of mindset with the corresponding pedagogy. The results offer insights into how to validate mindset interventions concerning the adjustment of situations to educational surroundings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124001111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consisting of three logically aligned sub-studies, the current research explored the features and mechanisms involved in aligning mindsets and pedagogies among teachers in upper-secondary education. In Study 1, 114 teachers participated in a two-round questionnaire survey investigating the descriptive characteristics of mindset and pedagogy. Two groups of teachers (N = 12) were semi-structure-interviewed in Study 2 to explore how these features were reflected in their teaching. Study 3 (N = 46) comprised focus-group interviews identifying the underlying mechanism determining which and how situational factors moderate the correspondence between mindset and pedagogy. Results indicated that teachers in upper-secondary education endorsed mixed pedagogies despite their mindsets. The mixing style was characterized by both process-focused and trait-focused pedagogical thinking, and both mastery-oriented and performance-oriented pedagogical practices, with variable persistence and differential instructions. Situations related to cultural orientation, educational system, social atmosphere and individual experiences moderated the alignment of mindset with the corresponding pedagogy. The results offer insights into how to validate mindset interventions concerning the adjustment of situations to educational surroundings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
思维不同,行为相同?高中教师的思维方式与教学法之间的对应关系是因势利导还是顾此失彼?
本研究由三项逻辑上相互关联的子研究组成,探讨了高中教师在统一思维方式和教学法方面的特点和机制。在研究 1 中,114 名教师参加了两轮问卷调查,调查心态和教学法的描述性特征。在研究 2 中,对两组教师(12 人)进行了半结构式访谈,以探讨这些特征如何反映在他们的教学中。研究 3(N = 46)包括焦点小组访谈,以确定哪些基本机制决定了情境因素以及情境因素如何调节心态与教学法之间的对应关系。研究结果表明,尽管存在思维模式,但高中教师仍认可混合教学法。混合风格的特点是,既有注重过程的教学思维,也有注重特质的教学思维;既有以掌握为导向的教学实践,也有以成绩为导向的教学实践;既有不同的持续性,也有不同的指导性。与文化取向、教育体制、社会氛围和个人经历有关的情况调节了思维方式与相应教学法的一致性。研究结果为如何验证与调整教育环境相关的心态干预措施提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
期刊最新文献
Creativity outcomes of physical activity interventions for children and adolescents: A systematic review Exploring the use of ChatGPT to foster EFL learners’ critical thinking skills from a post-humanist perspective The effect of interdisciplinary teaching approach on the creative and critical thinking skills of gifted pupils Remixing between imitation and originality: Exploring creative behaviors in scratch projects Zone of proximal creativity: An empirical study on EFL teachers’ use of ChatGPT for enhanced practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1