Communicating and managing aspirational talk-action tensions: An integrated approach of CSR discourse analysis

IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Public Relations Review Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102479
Angela K.Y. Mak , Zeping Huang
{"title":"Communicating and managing aspirational talk-action tensions: An integrated approach of CSR discourse analysis","authors":"Angela K.Y. Mak ,&nbsp;Zeping Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Inspired by propositions founded on the Communication as Constitutive of Organization literature, this paper employed a mixed method combining Cultural Discourse Analysis (CuDA) with Corpus Linguistics to investigate how companies manage aspirational talk-action tensions in corporate social responsibility (CSR) discourses for social license to operate. Ten sustainability reports of five companies in Singapore and Hong Kong were accessed to examine the emergence of CuDA discursive hubs (identity, relation, emotion, action, and dwelling), the articulation of linguistic elements via concordance analysis, and the adoption of socio-cultural dimensions in addressing tension mechanisms. Findings revealed intricate communication dynamics resulting in four strategies that companies undertook to address and manage discrepancies, thereby enabling the construction of effective narrative CSR communication. These strategies provide valuable insights for public relations practitioners who engage in sustainability reporting and seek to adequately handle aspirational talk-action tensions that can possibly cause negative impacts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"50 4","pages":"Article 102479"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811124000584","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inspired by propositions founded on the Communication as Constitutive of Organization literature, this paper employed a mixed method combining Cultural Discourse Analysis (CuDA) with Corpus Linguistics to investigate how companies manage aspirational talk-action tensions in corporate social responsibility (CSR) discourses for social license to operate. Ten sustainability reports of five companies in Singapore and Hong Kong were accessed to examine the emergence of CuDA discursive hubs (identity, relation, emotion, action, and dwelling), the articulation of linguistic elements via concordance analysis, and the adoption of socio-cultural dimensions in addressing tension mechanisms. Findings revealed intricate communication dynamics resulting in four strategies that companies undertook to address and manage discrepancies, thereby enabling the construction of effective narrative CSR communication. These strategies provide valuable insights for public relations practitioners who engage in sustainability reporting and seek to adequately handle aspirational talk-action tensions that can possibly cause negative impacts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沟通和管理愿望与行动之间的紧张关系:企业社会责任话语分析的综合方法
受 "沟通是组织的构成 "这一文献命题的启发,本文采用了一种将文化话语分析(CuDA)与语料库语言学相结合的混合方法,来研究企业如何在企业社会责任(CSR)话语中处理 "谈论-行动 "之间的紧张关系,以获得社会经营许可。研究人员访问了新加坡和香港五家公司的十份可持续发展报告,考察了 CuDA 话语中心(身份、关系、情感、行动和居住)的出现、通过一致性分析对语言要素的阐述,以及在解决紧张机制时社会文化维度的采用。研究结果揭示了错综复杂的传播动态,由此产生了企业为解决和管理差异而采取的四种策略,从而构建了有效的企业社会责任叙事传播。这些策略为从事可持续发展报告的公共关系实践者提供了有价值的见解,使他们能够充分处理可能造成负面影响的 "空谈-行动 "紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.
期刊最新文献
Different shades of green deception. Greenwashing’s adverse effects on corporate image and credibility Measuring social movement engagement: A co-creational approach to public engagement and social capital Editorial Board Effects of AI versus human source attribution on trust and forgiveness in the identical corporate apology statement for a data breach scandal “Being a Burson Person is something special”: Burson-Marsteller’s influence in the Americanization of the public relations industry in Latin America (1980s – 2010s)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1