Clemens Fuest , Klaus Gründler , Niklas Potrafke , Fabian Ruthardt
{"title":"Read my lips? Taxes and elections","authors":"Clemens Fuest , Klaus Gründler , Niklas Potrafke , Fabian Ruthardt","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2024.105149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent research has found distinct electoral cycles in public spending, but the evidence for cycles in taxation is scarce, reflecting a lack of cross-nationally comparable measures of tax reforms. We use qualitative data provided by the IMF (Amaglobeli et al., 2018) to compile comprehensive tax reform indicators that cover the entire tax system for 22 countries between 1960–2014, including reforms of tax rates and bases for six tax types. Relating tax reforms to the timing of elections, we find results that are consistent with politicians postponing tax reforms to periods after elections. The results are most pronounced for tax increases, are stronger for tax rates than bases, and are driven by particularly salient tax types (personal income taxes and the VAT).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Economics","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 105149"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272724000859","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent research has found distinct electoral cycles in public spending, but the evidence for cycles in taxation is scarce, reflecting a lack of cross-nationally comparable measures of tax reforms. We use qualitative data provided by the IMF (Amaglobeli et al., 2018) to compile comprehensive tax reform indicators that cover the entire tax system for 22 countries between 1960–2014, including reforms of tax rates and bases for six tax types. Relating tax reforms to the timing of elections, we find results that are consistent with politicians postponing tax reforms to periods after elections. The results are most pronounced for tax increases, are stronger for tax rates than bases, and are driven by particularly salient tax types (personal income taxes and the VAT).
最近的研究发现,公共开支有明显的选举周期,但税收周期的证据却很少,这反映出缺乏跨国可比的税收改革措施。我们利用国际货币基金组织(IMF)提供的定性数据(Amaglobeli et al.将税制改革与选举时间相关联,我们发现结果与政治家将税制改革推迟到选举之后的时期相一致。增税的结果最为明显,税率的结果强于税基的结果,特别突出的税种(个人所得税和增值税)推动了这一结果。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Economics aims to promote original scientific research in the field of public economics, focusing on the utilization of contemporary economic theory and quantitative analysis methodologies. It serves as a platform for the international scholarly community to engage in discussions on public policy matters.