S.L. Mastellar, B. Lowe, V.R. Haden, K. Bennett-Wimbush
{"title":"Equine relative preferences regarding selected cool-season grass hays","authors":"S.L. Mastellar, B. Lowe, V.R. Haden, K. Bennett-Wimbush","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Horse preferences for cool season grass cultivars under grazing has been described. However, preference for cool-season grass cultivars as hays has not been widely evaluated in horses, particularly the new varieties of Tall Fescue with novel endophytes designed to produce less ergovaline, the compound to which fescue toxicosis is attributed. First cutting hay was harvested in 2019 and 2020 from seven cool season grasses: Tall Fescue v. KY 31; Tall Fescue v. Bronson, endophyte free; Tall Fescue v. Texoma MaxQ, novel/non-toxic endophyte; Meadow Fescue v. Preval; Festulolium v. Spring Green; Perennial Ryegrass v. Elgon; and Orchardgrass v. Crown Royal. First cutting yield was determined on a dry weight basis. Sub-samples were analyzed for forage quality parameters and ergovaline concentrations. The effect of cultivar on mean hay yields was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA, and since the F-Value was significant (< 0.001) the least significant differences were further determined to compare yield differences among the cultivars. All three Tall Fescue cultivars, Meadow Fescue, and Festulolium had significantly greater yields than the Perennial Ryegrass and Orchardgrass (P < 0.05). All samples tested for ergovaline were below the reporting threshold of the laboratory. Subsequently, tillers of the Tall Fescue cultivars were evaluated for endophyte presence. Endophyte was detected in only 3.3 % and 16.7 % of v Bronson and Texoma MaxQ tillers, respectively. No endophyte was detected in v KY 31. To evaluate preference four mature idle horses (6 ± 1.08 yrs) were fasted 30 min prior to being in the test stalls for 30 min. First choice and weight consumed were recorded. Preference testing occurred within harvest year. Equine preference data were analyzed within year using a one-way ANOVA pairwise comparison with the Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple comparisons. Both forward and backward stepwise regression modelling were used to investigate proximate analyses values as potential predictors of cultivar consumption by the horses during the preference tests. The best performing model explained 36 % of the variation in cultivar consumption. Based on amounts consumed horses had similar preferences each year; the overall rank of the cultivars was very similar with only the two least preferred cultivars transposed from 2019 to 2020. Horses most preferred the lowest yielding cultivars (Perennial Ryegrass and Orchardgrass). Despite low ergovaline and endophyte content in the Tall Fescue varieties, adult horses preferred hay of other cultivars. Festulolium is an option for hay producers that balances both yield and horse preference.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"315 ","pages":"Article 116011"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840124001391/pdfft?md5=6220d1aa36ca216f9e840b4ecc0ee0b4&pid=1-s2.0-S0377840124001391-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840124001391","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Horse preferences for cool season grass cultivars under grazing has been described. However, preference for cool-season grass cultivars as hays has not been widely evaluated in horses, particularly the new varieties of Tall Fescue with novel endophytes designed to produce less ergovaline, the compound to which fescue toxicosis is attributed. First cutting hay was harvested in 2019 and 2020 from seven cool season grasses: Tall Fescue v. KY 31; Tall Fescue v. Bronson, endophyte free; Tall Fescue v. Texoma MaxQ, novel/non-toxic endophyte; Meadow Fescue v. Preval; Festulolium v. Spring Green; Perennial Ryegrass v. Elgon; and Orchardgrass v. Crown Royal. First cutting yield was determined on a dry weight basis. Sub-samples were analyzed for forage quality parameters and ergovaline concentrations. The effect of cultivar on mean hay yields was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA, and since the F-Value was significant (< 0.001) the least significant differences were further determined to compare yield differences among the cultivars. All three Tall Fescue cultivars, Meadow Fescue, and Festulolium had significantly greater yields than the Perennial Ryegrass and Orchardgrass (P < 0.05). All samples tested for ergovaline were below the reporting threshold of the laboratory. Subsequently, tillers of the Tall Fescue cultivars were evaluated for endophyte presence. Endophyte was detected in only 3.3 % and 16.7 % of v Bronson and Texoma MaxQ tillers, respectively. No endophyte was detected in v KY 31. To evaluate preference four mature idle horses (6 ± 1.08 yrs) were fasted 30 min prior to being in the test stalls for 30 min. First choice and weight consumed were recorded. Preference testing occurred within harvest year. Equine preference data were analyzed within year using a one-way ANOVA pairwise comparison with the Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple comparisons. Both forward and backward stepwise regression modelling were used to investigate proximate analyses values as potential predictors of cultivar consumption by the horses during the preference tests. The best performing model explained 36 % of the variation in cultivar consumption. Based on amounts consumed horses had similar preferences each year; the overall rank of the cultivars was very similar with only the two least preferred cultivars transposed from 2019 to 2020. Horses most preferred the lowest yielding cultivars (Perennial Ryegrass and Orchardgrass). Despite low ergovaline and endophyte content in the Tall Fescue varieties, adult horses preferred hay of other cultivars. Festulolium is an option for hay producers that balances both yield and horse preference.
马匹在放牧时对冷季型牧草品种的偏好已有描述。然而,马匹对冷季型牧草品种的偏好尚未得到广泛评估,尤其是含有新型内生菌的高羊茅新品种,其产生的麦角新碱较少,而麦角新碱是导致羊茅中毒的一种化合物。2019 年和 2020 年从七种冷季型牧草中收获了第一茬干草:高羊茅 v. KY 31;高羊茅 v. Bronson,无内生菌;高羊茅 v. Texoma MaxQ,新型/无毒内生菌;草甸羊茅 v. Preval;Festulolium v. Spring Green;多年生黑麦草 v. Elgon;以及果岭草 v. Crown Royal。首割产量按干重计算。对子样本进行了牧草质量参数和麦角碱浓度分析。使用单因素方差分析法分析了栽培品种对平均干草产量的影响,由于 F 值显著(< 0.001),因此进一步确定了最小显著差异,以比较栽培品种之间的产量差异。所有三个高羊茅栽培品种、草地羊茅和费斯托兰的产量都明显高于多年生黑麦草和果岭草(P <0.05)。所有检测麦角碱的样品均低于实验室的报告阈值。随后,对高羊茅栽培品种的分蘖进行了内生菌评估。v Bronson 和 Texoma MaxQ 的分蘖中分别只有 3.3% 和 16.7% 检测到内生菌。v KY 31没有检测到内生菌。为了评估四匹成熟闲散马(6 ± 1.08 岁)的偏好,在进入试验马厩 30 分钟之前先禁食 30 分钟。记录首选食物和消耗的重量。偏好测试在收获年内进行。使用单因子方差分析配对比较法分析马匹在同一年份的偏好数据,并使用 Tukey-Kramer 调整法进行多重比较。采用正向和反向逐步回归模型研究近似分析值作为偏好测试期间马匹食用栽培品种的潜在预测因子。表现最好的模型解释了36%的栽培品种消费变化。根据消耗量,马匹每年都有相似的偏好;栽培品种的总体排名非常相似,只有两个最不偏好的栽培品种从2019年调换到了2020年。马匹最喜欢产量最低的栽培品种(多年生黑麦草和果岭草)。尽管高羊茅品种的麦角碱和内生菌含量较低,但成年马更喜欢其他品种的干草。对于干草生产者来说,Festulolium 是一种能兼顾产量和马匹喜好的选择。
期刊介绍:
Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding.
Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome.
The journal covers the following areas:
Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement)
Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value
Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds
Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such
Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins)
Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions
Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation
Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.