Comparative techno-economic assessment of superhot rock and conventional geothermal energy feasibility for decarbonizing India

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Geothermics Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103078
Raj Kiran, Vinay Kumar Rajak, Rajeev Upadhyay, Ashutosh Kumar
{"title":"Comparative techno-economic assessment of superhot rock and conventional geothermal energy feasibility for decarbonizing India","authors":"Raj Kiran,&nbsp;Vinay Kumar Rajak,&nbsp;Rajeev Upadhyay,&nbsp;Ashutosh Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.geothermics.2024.103078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The commercial viability of low-temperature geothermal basins is still a major stumbling block for field implementation of geothermal projects in India. Though there are several low-temperature basins, the presence of high-temperature gradient in few regions of India led to the hypothesis of testing the advanced geothermal potential in India. Therefore, this study holistically investigates the prospect of superhot rock geothermal potential in India vis-à-vis the techno-economical prospect and reservoir characteristics. Additionally, a comparative study is conducted with respect to the conventional geothermal system in the Son-Narmada-Tapti field to understand the effects of technical and economic parameters.</p><p>The geothermal provinces in India can be utilized to reduce the use of fossil fuels for direct use and heating applications. However, geothermal resources suffer a setback due to high capital cost and risks associated with the feasibility of extraction process of heat energy. This study investigates the possibility of a superhot rock site to drive down the cost. To assess the technical feasibility, a comprehensive study is conducted using the reservoir heat and flow simulation for the proposed site. The study is conducted using the commercial package to obtain the heat energy that can be generated over the thirty years of injection and production. The feasibility analysis cannot be complete without the study of economic aspects. Hence, the market cost of electricity (LCOE) is estimated to understand the economic feasibility of the proposed superhot rock project. To get a better insight into the superhot rock potential, the resource potential and economic feasibility is compared with the similar system for the conventional geothermal prospect.</p><p>The reservoir simulation study suggests that the dual superhot rock well system has capacity to provide 170 – 175 MWe in the region which is much higher than that of the conventional system (12 – 15 MWe). Also, it was observed that the dual well geothermal system, the waterfront does not reach the producer well over the thirty years of cold-water injection in both systems. The economic feasibility study shows that the levelized cost of electricity is most likely to be $67/MWh which is significantly less than the conventional geothermal system ($122/MWh).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55095,"journal":{"name":"Geothermics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geothermics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375650524001676","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The commercial viability of low-temperature geothermal basins is still a major stumbling block for field implementation of geothermal projects in India. Though there are several low-temperature basins, the presence of high-temperature gradient in few regions of India led to the hypothesis of testing the advanced geothermal potential in India. Therefore, this study holistically investigates the prospect of superhot rock geothermal potential in India vis-à-vis the techno-economical prospect and reservoir characteristics. Additionally, a comparative study is conducted with respect to the conventional geothermal system in the Son-Narmada-Tapti field to understand the effects of technical and economic parameters.

The geothermal provinces in India can be utilized to reduce the use of fossil fuels for direct use and heating applications. However, geothermal resources suffer a setback due to high capital cost and risks associated with the feasibility of extraction process of heat energy. This study investigates the possibility of a superhot rock site to drive down the cost. To assess the technical feasibility, a comprehensive study is conducted using the reservoir heat and flow simulation for the proposed site. The study is conducted using the commercial package to obtain the heat energy that can be generated over the thirty years of injection and production. The feasibility analysis cannot be complete without the study of economic aspects. Hence, the market cost of electricity (LCOE) is estimated to understand the economic feasibility of the proposed superhot rock project. To get a better insight into the superhot rock potential, the resource potential and economic feasibility is compared with the similar system for the conventional geothermal prospect.

The reservoir simulation study suggests that the dual superhot rock well system has capacity to provide 170 – 175 MWe in the region which is much higher than that of the conventional system (12 – 15 MWe). Also, it was observed that the dual well geothermal system, the waterfront does not reach the producer well over the thirty years of cold-water injection in both systems. The economic feasibility study shows that the levelized cost of electricity is most likely to be $67/MWh which is significantly less than the conventional geothermal system ($122/MWh).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对超热岩和常规地热能源在印度去碳化的可行性进行技术经济比较评估
低温地热盆地的商业可行性仍然是印度实地实施地热项目的主要障碍。虽然印度有多个低温盆地,但由于印度少数地区存在高温梯度,因此提出了测试印度先进地热潜力的假设。因此,本研究从技术经济前景和储层特征两方面全面调查了印度超热岩地热潜力的前景。此外,还对 Son-Narmada-Tapti 油田的常规地热系统进行了比较研究,以了解技术和经济参数的影响。印度的地热资源可以减少化石燃料在直接使用和供热方面的使用。然而,地热资源却因高昂的资本成本和与热能提取过程的可行性相关的风险而遭受挫折。本研究探讨了利用超热岩场地降低成本的可能性。为了评估技术可行性,我们利用储层热量和流动模拟对拟议地点进行了全面研究。该研究使用商业软件包来获取注入和生产三十年可产生的热能。可行性分析离不开经济方面的研究。因此,我们估算了市场电力成本(LCOE),以了解拟议超级热岩项目的经济可行性。为了更好地了解超热岩的潜力,将资源潜力和经济可行性与传统地热勘探的类似系统进行了比较。储层模拟研究表明,双超热岩井系统在该地区有能力提供 170 - 175 MWe 的电力,远远高于传统系统(12 - 15 MWe)。此外,据观察,在双井地热系统中,两个系统在注入冷水的三十年内,滨水层都不会到达产水井。经济可行性研究表明,平准化电力成本很可能为 67 美元/兆瓦时,大大低于常规地热系统(122 美元/兆瓦时)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geothermics
Geothermics 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
237
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Geothermics is an international journal devoted to the research and development of geothermal energy. The International Board of Editors of Geothermics, which comprises specialists in the various aspects of geothermal resources, exploration and development, guarantees the balanced, comprehensive view of scientific and technological developments in this promising energy field. It promulgates the state of the art and science of geothermal energy, its exploration and exploitation through a regular exchange of information from all parts of the world. The journal publishes articles dealing with the theory, exploration techniques and all aspects of the utilization of geothermal resources. Geothermics serves as the scientific house, or exchange medium, through which the growing community of geothermal specialists can provide and receive information.
期刊最新文献
Experimental assessment of inter-well reinjection in standing column wells by analysis of transfer functions obtained from non-stationary deconvolution The certainty matrix for fault data and interpretations Investigation of radiogenic heat production in granites of the Goiás Tin Province, Central Brazil Influence of ground source heat exchanger operation modes on multi-borehole mid-deep ground source heat pump system performance Deep thermal state on the southern margin of the Zhangzhou Basin based on the electrical conductivity model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1