There's an App for That: Exploring the Market for Contraceptive Fertility Tracking Apps in the Philippines.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Studies in Family Planning Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1111/sifp.12265
Kendal Danna, Danielle M Harris, Claire W Rothschild, Beth Brogaard, Elizabeth LaCroix, Mahesh Paudel
{"title":"There's an App for That: Exploring the Market for Contraceptive Fertility Tracking Apps in the Philippines.","authors":"Kendal Danna, Danielle M Harris, Claire W Rothschild, Beth Brogaard, Elizabeth LaCroix, Mahesh Paudel","doi":"10.1111/sifp.12265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For generations, women have relied on fertility awareness methods to plan and prevent pregnancy, for over a decade, many have been aided by digital tools to do so. New contraceptive fertility tracking apps (CFTAs)-that are backed by clinical efficacy trials to support their effectiveness as contraception-have the potential to enhance method choice and offer users a unique contraceptive option, but there is little evidence to inform the decisions around expanding access, particularly in low-and middle-income countries. We conducted a mixed methods study with quantitative online surveys (n = 1600) and qualitative interviews (n = 36) to explore the potential appeal of and demand for a hypothetical CFTA in one such market, the Philippines. Interest in using a CFTA was high among our Internet-engaged, urban study population, with 83.9% \"definitely\" or \"probably\" interested in using it. Across demographic profiles, respondents perceived the appeal of the method as \"natural\" and \"convenient.\" A majority were willing to pay for the method, though notably at a price (5.20 USD) below that of currently available CFTAs. We discuss various important factors to be considered before bringing a method like this to new markets, including the potential implications of equity constraints in reaching a wider market and the unexpected prevalence of other period-tracking apps not intended as contraception being used in this market that could complicate any future roll-out. These issues could be explored further with additional research.</p>","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":" ","pages":"151-169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Family Planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For generations, women have relied on fertility awareness methods to plan and prevent pregnancy, for over a decade, many have been aided by digital tools to do so. New contraceptive fertility tracking apps (CFTAs)-that are backed by clinical efficacy trials to support their effectiveness as contraception-have the potential to enhance method choice and offer users a unique contraceptive option, but there is little evidence to inform the decisions around expanding access, particularly in low-and middle-income countries. We conducted a mixed methods study with quantitative online surveys (n = 1600) and qualitative interviews (n = 36) to explore the potential appeal of and demand for a hypothetical CFTA in one such market, the Philippines. Interest in using a CFTA was high among our Internet-engaged, urban study population, with 83.9% "definitely" or "probably" interested in using it. Across demographic profiles, respondents perceived the appeal of the method as "natural" and "convenient." A majority were willing to pay for the method, though notably at a price (5.20 USD) below that of currently available CFTAs. We discuss various important factors to be considered before bringing a method like this to new markets, including the potential implications of equity constraints in reaching a wider market and the unexpected prevalence of other period-tracking apps not intended as contraception being used in this market that could complicate any future roll-out. These issues could be explored further with additional research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菲律宾避孕生育跟踪应用程序市场探索探索菲律宾避孕生育跟踪应用程序市场。
几代人以来,妇女一直依靠生育意识方法来计划和预防怀孕,十多年来,许多妇女在数字工具的帮助下实现了这一目标。新的避孕生育跟踪应用程序(CFTAs)有临床疗效试验支持其避孕效果,有可能增加避孕方法的选择,并为用户提供独特的避孕选择,但几乎没有证据为扩大使用范围的决策提供依据,尤其是在中低收入国家。我们开展了一项混合方法研究,通过定量在线调查(n = 1600)和定性访谈(n = 36)来探讨假设的 CFTA 在菲律宾这一市场的潜在吸引力和需求。在我们的研究对象中,有 83.9% 的人 "肯定 "或 "可能 "有兴趣使用 CFTA。从不同的人口统计学特征来看,受访者认为这种方法的吸引力在于 "自然 "和 "方便"。大多数人愿意为这种方法付费,但价格(5.20 美元)明显低于目前可用的 CFTA。我们讨论了将这种方法推向新市场之前需要考虑的各种重要因素,包括在进入更广泛的市场时可能受到的公平性限制的影响,以及在该市场上使用的其他非避孕目的的月经跟踪应用程序的意外普遍性,这可能会使未来的推广工作复杂化。这些问题可以通过更多的研究来进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Studies in Family Planning publishes public health, social science, and biomedical research concerning sexual and reproductive health, fertility, and family planning, with a primary focus on developing countries. Each issue contains original research articles, reports, a commentary, book reviews, and a data section with findings for individual countries from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
期刊最新文献
Unwanted Family Planning Including Unwanted Sterilization: Preliminary Prevalence Estimates for India. The Reliability of Contraceptive Discontinuation Reporting in Burkina Faso, Kenya, and Uganda. Contraceptive Care Visit Objectives and Outcomes: Evidence From Burkina Faso, Pakistan, and Tanzania. Estimating the Social Visibility of Abortions in Uganda and Ethiopia Using the Game of Contacts Women's Perspectives on the Unique Benefits and Challenges of Self‐Injectable Contraception: A Four‐Country In‐Depth Interview Study in Sub‐Saharan Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1