Quantifying advances from basic research to applied research in material science

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Technovation Pub Date : 2024-06-09 DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103050
Noriyuki Higashide , Yi Zhang , Kimitaka Asatani , Takahiro Miura , Ichiro Sakata
{"title":"Quantifying advances from basic research to applied research in material science","authors":"Noriyuki Higashide ,&nbsp;Yi Zhang ,&nbsp;Kimitaka Asatani ,&nbsp;Takahiro Miura ,&nbsp;Ichiro Sakata","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Exploring the connection between basic science and its practical applications is critical to consider the social justification of the substantial governmental investments in science. However, there's a limited understanding of global research patterns and the dynamics of researcher collaboration from a basic-applied perspective because such studies have been mainly focused only on the biomedical field. Here, the main goal is to propose an indicator to quantify the degree of basic-applied research in academic papers. Using the indicator, we uncover how material science has advanced from basic to applied research, based on the international trends of the indicators and the affiliations of the scientists involved. We develop a methodology that indexes levels of advancement from basic research to applied research based on large-scale text data. The continuous scores assigned to each paper are derived from a vector space embedding technical terms from a broad network data. These scores align with experts' views in material science. This methodology enables us to monitor international trends that China has significantly advanced into applied research, as well as Chinese applied scientists increasingly associating with their domestic institutions. As science and technology implication, our methodology extends the boundary of assessing scientific research on its proximity to real-world applications and provides a tangible measure for funding agencies managing to fund or design research environments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103050"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224001007/pdfft?md5=45dd8f283c4875c0bf63b5038186c685&pid=1-s2.0-S0166497224001007-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224001007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exploring the connection between basic science and its practical applications is critical to consider the social justification of the substantial governmental investments in science. However, there's a limited understanding of global research patterns and the dynamics of researcher collaboration from a basic-applied perspective because such studies have been mainly focused only on the biomedical field. Here, the main goal is to propose an indicator to quantify the degree of basic-applied research in academic papers. Using the indicator, we uncover how material science has advanced from basic to applied research, based on the international trends of the indicators and the affiliations of the scientists involved. We develop a methodology that indexes levels of advancement from basic research to applied research based on large-scale text data. The continuous scores assigned to each paper are derived from a vector space embedding technical terms from a broad network data. These scores align with experts' views in material science. This methodology enables us to monitor international trends that China has significantly advanced into applied research, as well as Chinese applied scientists increasingly associating with their domestic institutions. As science and technology implication, our methodology extends the boundary of assessing scientific research on its proximity to real-world applications and provides a tangible measure for funding agencies managing to fund or design research environments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化材料科学从基础研究到应用研究的进展
探索基础科学与其实际应用之间的联系,对于考虑政府在科学领域大量投资的社会合理性至关重要。然而,由于此类研究主要集中在生物医学领域,因此从基础-应用角度对全球研究模式和研究人员合作动态的了解十分有限。在此,我们的主要目标是提出一个指标,以量化学术论文中基础-应用研究的程度。利用该指标,我们将根据指标的国际趋势和相关科学家的所属单位,揭示材料科学如何从基础研究推进到应用研究。我们开发了一种方法,基于大规模文本数据对从基础研究到应用研究的发展水平进行指数化。分配给每篇论文的连续分数来自于嵌入了广泛网络数据中技术术语的向量空间。这些分数与材料科学领域专家的观点一致。通过这种方法,我们可以监测到中国在应用研究领域取得重大进展的国际趋势,以及中国应用科学家与国内机构日益密切的联系。作为一种科学和技术影响,我们的方法扩展了评估科学研究与现实世界应用接近程度的边界,并为管理资助或设计研究环境的资助机构提供了一个具体的衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
期刊最新文献
Capturing the breadth of value creation with science fiction storytelling: Evidence from smart service design workshops A classification framework for generative artificial intelligence for social good Digital technology and innovation:The impact of blockchain application on enterprise innovation Exploring and investigating the complementarity and multidimensionality of innovation for sustainability research: Past present and future Facilitator or figurehead? The impact of academician shareholder on corporate innovation: Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1