Toward a Cross-Platform Framework: Assessing the Comprehensiveness of Online Rental Listings.

IF 0.4 Q4 URBAN STUDIES Cityscape Pub Date : 2021-01-01
Ana Costa, Victoria Sass, Ian Kennedy, Roshni Roy, Rebecca J Walter, Arthur Acolin, Kyle Crowder, Chris Hess, Alex Ramiller, Sarah Chasins
{"title":"Toward a Cross-Platform Framework: Assessing the Comprehensiveness of Online Rental Listings.","authors":"Ana Costa, Victoria Sass, Ian Kennedy, Roshni Roy, Rebecca J Walter, Arthur Acolin, Kyle Crowder, Chris Hess, Alex Ramiller, Sarah Chasins","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on rental housing markets in the United States has traditionally relied on national or local housing surveys. Those sources lack temporal and spatial specificity, limiting their use for tracking short-term changes in local markets. As rental housing ads have transitioned to digital spaces, a growing body of literature has utilized web scraping to analyze listing practices and variations in rental market dynamics. Those studies have primarily relied on one platform, Craigslist, as a source of data. Despite Craigslist's popularity, the authors contend that rental listings from various websites, rather than from individual ones, provide a more comprehensive picture. Using a mixed-methods approach to study listings across various platforms in five metropolitan areas, this article demonstrates considerable variation in both the types of rental units advertised and the features provided across those platforms. The article begins with an account of the birth and consolidation of online rental platforms and emergent characteristics of several selected websites, including the criteria for posting, search parameters, search results priority, and first-page search results. Visualizations are used to compare features such as the 40th percentile of rent, rent distribution, and bedroom size based on scraped data from six online platforms (Padmapper, Forrent.com, Trulia, Zillow, Craigslist, and GoSection8), 2020 Fair Market Rents, and 2019 American Community Survey data. The analyses indicate that online listing platforms target different audiences and offer distinct information on units within those market segments, resulting in markedly different estimates of local rental costs and unit size distribution depending on the platform.</p>","PeriodicalId":46856,"journal":{"name":"Cityscape","volume":"23 2","pages":"327-339"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9121771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cityscape","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on rental housing markets in the United States has traditionally relied on national or local housing surveys. Those sources lack temporal and spatial specificity, limiting their use for tracking short-term changes in local markets. As rental housing ads have transitioned to digital spaces, a growing body of literature has utilized web scraping to analyze listing practices and variations in rental market dynamics. Those studies have primarily relied on one platform, Craigslist, as a source of data. Despite Craigslist's popularity, the authors contend that rental listings from various websites, rather than from individual ones, provide a more comprehensive picture. Using a mixed-methods approach to study listings across various platforms in five metropolitan areas, this article demonstrates considerable variation in both the types of rental units advertised and the features provided across those platforms. The article begins with an account of the birth and consolidation of online rental platforms and emergent characteristics of several selected websites, including the criteria for posting, search parameters, search results priority, and first-page search results. Visualizations are used to compare features such as the 40th percentile of rent, rent distribution, and bedroom size based on scraped data from six online platforms (Padmapper, Forrent.com, Trulia, Zillow, Craigslist, and GoSection8), 2020 Fair Market Rents, and 2019 American Community Survey data. The analyses indicate that online listing platforms target different audiences and offer distinct information on units within those market segments, resulting in markedly different estimates of local rental costs and unit size distribution depending on the platform.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
迈向跨平台框架:评估在线租房信息的全面性。
对美国住房租赁市场的研究历来依赖于全国或地方住房调查。这些来源缺乏时间和空间上的特殊性,限制了它们在跟踪当地市场短期变化方面的应用。随着房屋租赁广告过渡到数字空间,越来越多的文献利用网络搜索来分析房屋出租行为和租赁市场动态的变化。这些研究主要依赖于一个平台,即 Craigslist,作为数据来源。尽管 Craigslist 很受欢迎,但作者认为,来自不同网站而非单个网站的租房信息能提供更全面的信息。本文采用混合方法研究了五个大都市地区不同平台上的房源信息,结果表明,这些平台上刊登的出租房类型和提供的功能都存在很大差异。文章首先介绍了在线租房平台的诞生和整合,以及几个选定网站的新特点,包括发布标准、搜索参数、搜索结果优先级和首页搜索结果。根据从六个在线平台(Padmapper、Forrent.com、Trulia、Zillow、Craigslist 和 GoSection8)获取的数据、2020 年公平市场租金和 2019 年美国社区调查数据,使用可视化方法比较了租金第 40 百分位数、租金分布和卧室大小等特征。分析表明,在线房源平台针对不同的受众,并提供这些细分市场中不同的单位信息,导致对当地租金成本和单位面积分布的估算因平台不同而明显不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cityscape
Cityscape URBAN STUDIES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Health Status of Women with Children Living in Public and Assisted Housing: Linkage of the National Health Interview Survey to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Administrative Data. Move-In Fees as a Residential Sorting Mechanism Within Online Rental Markets. Toward a Cross-Platform Framework: Assessing the Comprehensiveness of Online Rental Listings. Hispanic Disaster Preparedness in the United States, 2017: Examining the Association with Residential Characteristics. 'Then I Found Housing and Everything Changed': Transitions to Rent-Assisted Housing and Diabetes Self-Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1