Extracorporeal organ support for critically ill patients: Overcoming the past, achieving the maximum at present, and redefining the future.

Panagiotis Papamichalis, Katerina G Oikonomou, Maria Xanthoudaki, Asimina Valsamaki, Apostolia-Lemonia Skoura, Sophia K Papathanasiou, Achilleas Chovas
{"title":"Extracorporeal organ support for critically ill patients: Overcoming the past, achieving the maximum at present, and redefining the future.","authors":"Panagiotis Papamichalis, Katerina G Oikonomou, Maria Xanthoudaki, Asimina Valsamaki, Apostolia-Lemonia Skoura, Sophia K Papathanasiou, Achilleas Chovas","doi":"10.5492/wjccm.v13.i2.92458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extracorporeal organ support (ECOS) has made remarkable progress over the last few years. Renal replacement therapy, introduced a few decades ago, was the first available application of ECOS. The subsequent evolution of ECOS enabled the enhanced support to many other organs, including the heart [veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), slow continuous ultrafiltration], the lungs (veno-venous ECMO, extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal), and the liver (blood purification techniques for the detoxification of liver toxins). Moreover, additional indications of these methods, including the suppression of excessive inflammatory response occurring in severe disorders such as sepsis, coronavirus disease 2019, pancreatitis, and trauma (blood purification techniques for the removal of exotoxins, endotoxins, or cytokines), have arisen. Multiple organ support therapy is crucial since a vast majority of critically ill patients present not with a single but with multiple organ failure (MOF), whereas, traditional therapeutic approaches (mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure, antibiotics for sepsis, and inotropes for cardiac dysfunction) have reached the maximum efficacy and cannot be improved further. However, several issues remain to be clarified, such as the complexity and cost of ECOS systems, standardization of indications, therapeutic protocols and initiation time, choice of the patients who will benefit most from these interventions, while evidence from randomized controlled trials supporting their use is still limited. Nevertheless, these methods are currently a part of routine clinical practice in intensive care units. This editorial presents the past, present, and future considerations, as well as perspectives regarding these therapies. Our better understanding of these methods, the pathophysiology of MOF, the crosstalk between native organs resulting in MOF, and the crosstalk between native organs and artificial organ support systems when applied sequentially or simultaneously, will lead to the multiplication of their effects and the minimization of complications arising from their use.</p>","PeriodicalId":66959,"journal":{"name":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11155504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v13.i2.92458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extracorporeal organ support (ECOS) has made remarkable progress over the last few years. Renal replacement therapy, introduced a few decades ago, was the first available application of ECOS. The subsequent evolution of ECOS enabled the enhanced support to many other organs, including the heart [veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), slow continuous ultrafiltration], the lungs (veno-venous ECMO, extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal), and the liver (blood purification techniques for the detoxification of liver toxins). Moreover, additional indications of these methods, including the suppression of excessive inflammatory response occurring in severe disorders such as sepsis, coronavirus disease 2019, pancreatitis, and trauma (blood purification techniques for the removal of exotoxins, endotoxins, or cytokines), have arisen. Multiple organ support therapy is crucial since a vast majority of critically ill patients present not with a single but with multiple organ failure (MOF), whereas, traditional therapeutic approaches (mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure, antibiotics for sepsis, and inotropes for cardiac dysfunction) have reached the maximum efficacy and cannot be improved further. However, several issues remain to be clarified, such as the complexity and cost of ECOS systems, standardization of indications, therapeutic protocols and initiation time, choice of the patients who will benefit most from these interventions, while evidence from randomized controlled trials supporting their use is still limited. Nevertheless, these methods are currently a part of routine clinical practice in intensive care units. This editorial presents the past, present, and future considerations, as well as perspectives regarding these therapies. Our better understanding of these methods, the pathophysiology of MOF, the crosstalk between native organs resulting in MOF, and the crosstalk between native organs and artificial organ support systems when applied sequentially or simultaneously, will lead to the multiplication of their effects and the minimization of complications arising from their use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为危重病人提供体外器官支持:克服过去,实现当前最大值,重新定义未来。
体外器官支持(ECOS)在过去几年中取得了显著进展。几十年前推出的肾脏替代疗法是 ECOS 的首次应用。ECOS 随后的发展加强了对许多其他器官的支持,包括心脏(静脉-动脉体外膜氧合(ECMO)、慢速连续超滤)、肺(静脉-静脉 ECMO、体外二氧化碳清除)和肝脏(用于肝脏毒素解毒的血液净化技术)。此外,这些方法的其他适应症也已出现,包括抑制败血症、2019 年冠状病毒病、胰腺炎和创伤等严重疾病中出现的过度炎症反应(清除外毒素、内毒素或细胞因子的血液净化技术)。多器官支持疗法至关重要,因为绝大多数重症患者出现的不是单一器官衰竭,而是多器官衰竭(MOF),而传统的治疗方法(机械通气治疗急性呼吸衰竭、抗生素治疗败血症、肌注治疗心功能不全)已达到最大疗效,无法再进一步改善。然而,有几个问题仍有待澄清,如 ECOS 系统的复杂性和成本,适应症、治疗方案和启动时间的标准化,选择从这些干预措施中获益最多的患者,而支持其使用的随机对照试验证据仍然有限。尽管如此,这些方法目前已成为重症监护病房常规临床实践的一部分。这篇社论介绍了有关这些疗法的过去、现在和未来的考虑因素以及观点。我们对这些方法、MOF 的病理生理学、导致 MOF 的原生器官之间的串扰以及原生器官和人工器官支持系统之间在先后或同时应用时的串扰有了更好的了解,这将促使这些方法的效果倍增,并最大限度地减少因使用这些方法而引起的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
216
期刊最新文献
Antimicrobial and synergistic effects of lemongrass and geranium essential oils against Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida spp. Driving pressure: A useful tool for reducing postoperative pulmonary complications. Early clinical outcomes of two regimens of prophylactic antibiotics in cardiac surgical patients with delayed sternal closure. Impact of different intravenous bolus rates on fluid and electrolyte balance and mortality in critically ill patients. Low T3 vs low T3T4 euthyroid sick syndrome in septic shock patients: A prospective observational cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1