Minor loss or huge threat? Assessment of potential infrastructure projects reveals drastic landscape degradation in the Atlantic forest

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Journal for Nature Conservation Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126662
Jéssica Stéfane Alves Cunha , Nathan Castro Fonsêca , Cinthia Renata Vieira de Lima , Jhonathan Gomes dos Santos , Herbert de Tejo Pereira , Bruna Martins Bezerra , Ana Carolina Borges Lins-e-Silva
{"title":"Minor loss or huge threat? Assessment of potential infrastructure projects reveals drastic landscape degradation in the Atlantic forest","authors":"Jéssica Stéfane Alves Cunha ,&nbsp;Nathan Castro Fonsêca ,&nbsp;Cinthia Renata Vieira de Lima ,&nbsp;Jhonathan Gomes dos Santos ,&nbsp;Herbert de Tejo Pereira ,&nbsp;Bruna Martins Bezerra ,&nbsp;Ana Carolina Borges Lins-e-Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Projects demanding deforestation to expand urban infrastructure and road networks put pressure on the Atlantic Forest − a hyper-fragmented global conservation hotspot known for its high biodiversity and endemism. To support decision-making, we applied a scientific approach to analyse the immediate and long-term impacts of two major planned projects in the most threatened Atlantic Forest region – the Pernambuco Endemism Center, a crucial area for the survival of many endemic species. A Metropolitan Road Arch and a Training School for Career Sergeants are expected in the Environmental Protection Area Aldeia-Beberibe (31,634 ha) in the next few years. The area has 198 protected forest remnants, including one larger than 10,000 ha. Our analysis shows that the projects’ implementation may deforest 189 ha, increase fragment number by 3.5 % and decrease the average patch area by 4 %. The largest fragment will be divided into two. We may lose 335,307 trees and 44,655.59 Mg of carbon. Approximately 112.67 ha of watershed protection will be damaged. Thus, in the medium to long term, habitat quality will worsen, and the probability of connectivity will decrease, restricting forest-dependent species’ mobility considerably. To date, alternative areas have been proposed in meetings, working groups, and environmental advisory bodies for the analysed projects.<!--> <!-->We strongly oppose further deforestation and suggest that science-based approaches must be immediately considered for any project that requires forest suppression in highly fragmented landscapes. This is crucial to mitigate the alarming scenarios of extreme climate and biodiversity loss that we are currently witnessing in Brazil and worldwide.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 126662"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138124001110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Projects demanding deforestation to expand urban infrastructure and road networks put pressure on the Atlantic Forest − a hyper-fragmented global conservation hotspot known for its high biodiversity and endemism. To support decision-making, we applied a scientific approach to analyse the immediate and long-term impacts of two major planned projects in the most threatened Atlantic Forest region – the Pernambuco Endemism Center, a crucial area for the survival of many endemic species. A Metropolitan Road Arch and a Training School for Career Sergeants are expected in the Environmental Protection Area Aldeia-Beberibe (31,634 ha) in the next few years. The area has 198 protected forest remnants, including one larger than 10,000 ha. Our analysis shows that the projects’ implementation may deforest 189 ha, increase fragment number by 3.5 % and decrease the average patch area by 4 %. The largest fragment will be divided into two. We may lose 335,307 trees and 44,655.59 Mg of carbon. Approximately 112.67 ha of watershed protection will be damaged. Thus, in the medium to long term, habitat quality will worsen, and the probability of connectivity will decrease, restricting forest-dependent species’ mobility considerably. To date, alternative areas have been proposed in meetings, working groups, and environmental advisory bodies for the analysed projects. We strongly oppose further deforestation and suggest that science-based approaches must be immediately considered for any project that requires forest suppression in highly fragmented landscapes. This is crucial to mitigate the alarming scenarios of extreme climate and biodiversity loss that we are currently witnessing in Brazil and worldwide.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻微损失还是巨大威胁?潜在基础设施项目评估显示大西洋森林景观急剧退化
为扩建城市基础设施和道路网络而要求砍伐森林的项目给大西洋森林带来了压力,而大西洋森林是一个以生物多样性和特有性丰富而闻名的全球保护热点地区。为了支持决策,我们采用科学方法分析了在最受威胁的大西洋森林地区--伯南布哥特有物种中心--的两个主要规划项目的近期和长期影响,该中心是许多特有物种生存的关键地区。未来几年内,预计将在阿尔代亚-贝贝里贝环境保护区(31,634 公顷)修建一座大都会道路拱门和一所职业军士培训学校。该地区有 198 处森林保护区,其中一处面积超过 10 000 公顷。我们的分析表明,项目的实施可能会毁林 189 公顷,片段数量增加 3.5%,平均片段面积减少 4%。最大的片段将一分为二。我们可能会损失 335 307 棵树和 44 655.59 兆克碳。约 112.67 公顷的流域保护区将遭到破坏。因此,从中长期来看,栖息地的质量将恶化,连通性将降低,从而大大限制了依赖森林的物种的活动。迄今为止,已在会议、工作组和环境咨询机构中为所分析的项目提出了替代区域。我们强烈反对进一步砍伐森林,并建议任何需要在高度破碎的地貌中抑制森林的项目都必须立即考虑以科学为基础的方法。这对于缓解我们目前在巴西和全世界目睹的极端气候和生物多样性丧失的令人担忧的情况至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Nature Conservation
Journal for Nature Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation. Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Corrigendum to “Surviving the Tide: Assessing Guiana dolphin persistence amidst growing threats in a protected estuary in South-eastern Brazil” [J. Nature Conserv. 82 (2024) 126713] From virtue to sin: Is the installation of bat boxes an effective conservation measure or a potential pitfall for vulnerable bat species? Paying for green tide management or participating in cleanup activities? Testing and controlling for payment vehicle bias in the valuation of ecological damage caused by green tides Predicting climate driven habitat shifts for the Egyptian vulture in Punjab, Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1