Pandemic effects: Do innovation activities of firms suffer from Long COVID?

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Research Policy Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2024.105024
Markus Trunschke , Bettina Peters , Dirk Czarnitzki , Christian Rammer
{"title":"Pandemic effects: Do innovation activities of firms suffer from Long COVID?","authors":"Markus Trunschke ,&nbsp;Bettina Peters ,&nbsp;Dirk Czarnitzki ,&nbsp;Christian Rammer","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The COVID-19 pandemic exogenously hit many economies early 2020. Exploiting treatment heterogeneity, we use a conditional difference-in-differences design to causally identify how COVID-19 impacted firms’ innovation spending in the short and medium term. Based on a representative sample of German firms, we find that firms that were strongly negatively treated by COVID-19 substantially reduced innovation spending not only in the first year of the pandemic (2020) but also in the two subsequent years, indicating ‘Long COVID’ effects on innovation. Firms with higher pre-treatment digital capabilities showed higher innovation resilience during the pandemic. Moreover, COVID-19 also led to a decrease in innovation spending in those firms that were positively treated by COVID-19 through an unexpected positive demand shock, presumably to increase production capacity. Overall, these short and medium-term innovation reactions have a substantial repercussion on the macro level. In 2020, innovation expenditure fell by 4.7% due to COVID-19. In 2022, innovation spending was even 5.4% lower compared to the counterfactual scenario without the pandemic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324000738","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic exogenously hit many economies early 2020. Exploiting treatment heterogeneity, we use a conditional difference-in-differences design to causally identify how COVID-19 impacted firms’ innovation spending in the short and medium term. Based on a representative sample of German firms, we find that firms that were strongly negatively treated by COVID-19 substantially reduced innovation spending not only in the first year of the pandemic (2020) but also in the two subsequent years, indicating ‘Long COVID’ effects on innovation. Firms with higher pre-treatment digital capabilities showed higher innovation resilience during the pandemic. Moreover, COVID-19 also led to a decrease in innovation spending in those firms that were positively treated by COVID-19 through an unexpected positive demand shock, presumably to increase production capacity. Overall, these short and medium-term innovation reactions have a substantial repercussion on the macro level. In 2020, innovation expenditure fell by 4.7% due to COVID-19. In 2022, innovation spending was even 5.4% lower compared to the counterfactual scenario without the pandemic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流行病效应:企业的创新活动是否会受到 Long COVID 的影响?
2020 年初,COVID-19 大流行病外生地袭击了许多经济体。利用待遇异质性,我们采用条件差分设计,从因果关系上确定 COVID-19 如何在短期和中期影响企业的创新支出。基于具有代表性的德国企业样本,我们发现受到 COVID-19 强烈负面影响的企业不仅在大流行的第一年(2020 年)大幅减少了创新支出,而且在随后的两年也是如此,这表明 COVID-19 对创新产生了 "长 COVID "效应。治疗前数字化能力较高的企业在大流行期间表现出更高的创新复原力。此外,COVID-19 还导致那些受到 COVID-19 积极影响的企业的创新支出减少,原因是意外的积极需求冲击,可能是为了提高生产能力。总体而言,这些短期和中期创新反应对宏观层面产生了重大影响。2020 年,由于 COVID-19 的影响,创新支出下降了 4.7%。2022 年,与没有大流行病的反事实情景相比,创新支出甚至减少了 5.4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
期刊最新文献
Transformation of the governance of failure for radical innovation: The role of strategic leaders How media portrayal of CEO overconfidence impacts radical innovation The determinants of parallel invention: Measuring the role of information sharing and personal interaction between inventors Do the elite university projects promote scientific research competitiveness: Evidence from NSFC grants The bidirectional causality of tie stability and innovation performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1